Flashcards
Speech Production
Cards in this deck (43)
- 1Ways to investigate speech production- Observations of movements of speech (MRI, electropalatography)
- Recordings of acoustic product (coarticulation)
- Analysis of natural and induced speech errors- spoonerisms
- Neuroimaging studies-fMRI
- Genetic investigations of speech - 2How do we speak?Air flows from the lungs through the larynx where air passes over the vocal fold producing a noise
Articulators shapes the noise: lips, tongue, jaw, soft palate - 3What are formants?Frequencies that are enhanced
- 4PitchChange in the rate of vibrations
- 5Fitch (2010)Source-filter model
Analogy of a lamp shining in a house
Lamp (source) provides energy, windows (filters) determine how much light can escape, peaks in the light cast outside the house = formants - 6PlosivesStop consonants
Involve full closure of vocal tract
P B K G T D - 7Place of articulationPosition of vocal tract closure
Labial (lips) = B P
Alveolar (behind lips) = D T
Velar (back of mouth) = G K - 8VoicingCompressed air forces open closed vocal folds in the larynx
Positive = B D G - 9MannerHow a sound is articulated
- 10StopsComplete vocal tract closure followed by a burst release 'gave'
- 11FricativesTurbulent airstream through oral constriction
Noisy sounds with lots of different frequencies
S F T - 12NasalsVelum closes off oral cavity
Sounds produced in nasal cavity
'man' - 13VowelsNo closure but where tongue is placed
Front, central, back
Closed, close-mid, open-mid, open - 14What is electropalatography?Technique used to measure movements of the tongue
Electrodes measure where the tongue is positioned
Advantage: temporal sensitivity
Disadvantage: not natural speech - 15What do the KE family show?Some show a severe developmental deficit in speech and language
Problem in complex orofacial movements for speech - 16Watkins et al. (2002)Also show deficits in language comprehension and production BUT not IQ- similar to those unaffected
- 17Fisher et al. (1998)Dominant gene on chromosome 7 - FOXP2
Codes for transcription factor
Important for neural development of CNS, heart + lungs - 18Watkins et al. (2002)Brain structure in KE family of those affected and unaffected
Reduced grey ,matter density in affected
L + R caudate nuclei, L inferior frontal cortex + left SMA
Did not affect grey matter in inferior frontal and motor regions - important for speech - 19Fisher & Scharff (2009)Humans, monkeys, mice, rats, birds, crocodiles, zebrafish
Reduced FOXP2= speech and language deficits in humans, impaired vocal learning in birds, abnormal synaptic plasticity + motor skill learning deficits in mice - 20What are the many stages of speaking?Activation of a lexical concept (semantic message)
Selection of correct synaptic structure (grammatically correct)
Activation of phonological and phonetic code
Coordination of muscles for articulation - 21Levelt et al. (1989)Simple model of speech production
Stages discreet, sequential
1. Conceptualisation: identifying intended message (abstract level)
2. Formulation: concepts into message (2 stages)
Lemma-syntactic but not phonological specification (tip tongue)
Lexeme-phonological word form
3. Articulation: taking word form + executing phonemes - 22Schreibers et al. (1990)RTs for picture naming task with auditory distractors
Word semantically related (GOAT) before slowed naming of sheep picture
Phonological distractor presented with or later speeds up naming (SHEET)- phonological facilitation
Semantic concepts happen first - 23Fromkin (1973)Speech Errors
- 24Example of exchange errorLet's go to Yew Nork
- 25Example of preservationI like cats and cogs
- 26Example of additionLet's go to the plub
- 27Example of substitutionEat with your knife and fingers
- 28Example of deletionIt was intentional (unintentional)
- 29Speech errors at a semantic levelWord substitutions: blonde eyes
- Belong to same category as intended
- Mostly affects content words
- Many not sound like intended at all
- Wrong semantic unit activated? - 30Speech errors at a phonological levelPhoneme substitution: I like dogs more than hats
Spoonerisms: You've tasted two worms
- May not be semantically related
- Lexical advantage- more likely to be word than non-word
- Occur when wrong phoneme unit is activated - 31Speech errors at a mixed levelMixed errors: I have to feed the rat
Blend errors: The chung of today
- Sound and mean similar things to intended - 32Dell et al. (1986)Cascaded processing model to explain mixed errors
Connections are bidirectional, most active phonemes are output
Semantic feature to word or lemma to phoneme nodes - 33Example of cascaded processing model using 'CAT'- Activates semantic nodes (furry, animal, small)
- Activates similar lemma nodes (dog, rat)
- Component phonemes are activated (cat and rat have 2 phonemes similar)
- Activated + feedback to word form level (including MAT)
- Over time, feedback + feedforward connections strengthen CAT + RAT over CAT + MAT
- Explains why real words than non words - 34Levelt (1999)Alternative explanation to mixed errors
Internal Error Monitor-a checking system that might let something slip through - 35Garnham et al. (1991)Make speech errors rarely
1 in 900 words - 36Dronkers (1996)Overlap of lesions sites in those with apraxia of speech
All had damage to superior tip of pre central gyrus of the insula (SPGI)
Stroke patients with no apraxia had this region spared - 37What other regions have been found to be affected?Inferior frontal gyrus
Basal ganglia
Supplementary motor cortex - 38Indefrey & Levelt (2004)Meta-analysis of 82 studies
Speed production using different techniques (PET, MRI)
Create a map of the simple model stages
- Lemma selection is complete between 150-330ms post picture onset
- Duration range for form encoding from 217-530ms - 39Indefrey & Levelt (2000)Main components of word production networks are largely left lateralised
Originally only four 6 common areas for picture naming and word generation - 40DIVA ModelsDirection In Velocities of Articulators
- 41Tourville & Guenther (2010)DIVA model is an adaptive neural network that describes the sensorimotor interactions involved in articulator control during speech production
Speech sound as input generates a time sequence of articulator positions that command movements of the stimulated vocal tract that produce the desired sounds
Assign components of model to regions of the brain - 42Based on ERROR prevention/reduction- Feedforward loops from speech planning regions send information about intended utterance to the auditory and somatosensory target maps
- Actual sensory experience is compared with the target experience to calculate error
- Feedback to the motor centres aims to reduce this error - 43Guenther et al. (2009)26 year olds 'locked in'
Principle of model
Electrodes placed in ventral premotor cortex to intended formants
Goes through a synthesiser to produce speech (brain computer interface)
Information
- Description
- Language, Communication and Thought (PS3022) Flashcards on Speech Production , created by Eleni Blakemore on 16/05/2017.
- Created by
- Eleni Blakemore
- Views
- 3
- Rating