GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Flashcards

Incapacitation

Danielley Criminology Undergraduate degree English 13 cards

Cards in this deck (13)

  1. 1main sourcevon Hirsch and Ashworth
  2. 2considerationsnormally on basis of how likely to reoffend - irony because most likely to reoffend = most petty, serious = least likely to reoffend (e.g. crimes of passion etc)
  3. 3typescustody, disqualification, house arrest etc
  4. 4wider definition?Malsch and Duker: anything which prevents/makes impossible certain actions without any other goal (e.g. rehab) - e.g. ASBOs, restraining orders, tags etc
  5. 5problemscostly!!
    issues of JUSTICE and RESPONSIBILITY
    risk assessment + false positives + lack of data
    Floud Report
    criminogenic: Sampson and Laub (use what you know from YJ)
    doesn't take gravity into account
    normally done on basis of likelihood of reoffending but irony
    only way to get 'dangerous' = lots of false positives
    irony of age (use Kinzy, 2008)
  6. 6how does it fit with other theories?Tonry: flipside of rehab
    BUT
    could also be fail-safe, part of traditional view of rehab (for incurables)
    can be used to deter generally and specifically
    retributive if proportional, expresses censure - doesn't take gravity into account enough though
  7. 7costBarker (2010): controversial whether cost of incapacitation is worth it for effect on crime (can't really tell)
  8. 8public opinion? sentencers?attractive: quick, direct, value free
    public and tough punitive attitude
  9. 9modifying theory of incapacitationselective incapacitation
    Morris: use desert as guideline?
    maybe even 2 track system?
  10. 10devising a test for incapacitation?Bottoms and Brownsword: vivid danger + TEST
    overcoming fairness in extreme circumstances
    seriousness, certainty, temporality (frequency and immediacy)
    BUT
    von Hirsch and Ashworth: need high threshold
  11. 112 track system?Albrecht: Germany
    1: retribution, commensurate
    2. prevention, non-com (special offenders)
  12. 12Proportionality?von Hirsch: false +ves infringe on rights of offenders, not proportional
    Walker: harm to others = forfeit of assumption of harmlessness
  13. 13empirical evidenceGreenwood: works
    Blokland and Nieuwbeerta: sustainable decline in crime when incapacitating freq offenders (25% decrease under strictest regime)

Information

Description
Undergraduate degree Criminology Flashcards on Incapacitation, created by Danielley on 04/06/2014.
Created by
Danielley
Views
12
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?