Comparing Community of Inquiry and Online Collaborative Learning

Description

sketching out some of the particulars of the CoI theory and the OCL model
Tek Trekker
Mind Map by Tek Trekker, updated more than 1 year ago
Tek Trekker
Created by Tek Trekker over 6 years ago
101
0

Resource summary

Comparing Community of Inquiry and Online Collaborative Learning
  1. Community of Inquiry

    Annotations:

    • Doesn't really list specific instructional guidelines and, as such is more of a theory than a model
    1. Subject matter expert, intellectual/scholarly leader; Designer, facilitator, & director of learners' social & cognitive processes, Interaction facilitator, 'master learner'
      1. Notice that the teacher is concerned with cognitive & social/motivational factors.
        1. To be present - cognitively & socially; to work with group to explore, integrate, and resolve ideas; to interact and to help become 'master learner'
          1. Content - activity or reading - triggers intellectual curiosity; discussion becomes part of content to explore, integrate, resolve ideas
            1. Discussion, Direction Instruction, pragmatic inquiry
              1. Online environments - synchronous & asynchronous
                1. Increased engagement, excellent for developing HOTS, faculty may find it easier to transition to collaborative learning since this theory has elements of direct instruction,
                  1. Complex, evaluating indicators for social, cognitive, teaching presence is challenging & time-consuming, a lot of pressure on teacher to create and maintain an optimal educational experience. Difficult to get students to go beyond the 'exploration' phase.
      2. Online Collaborative Learning Theory

        Annotations:

        • Lists specific instructional activities so it's more of a model in support of the theory of collaborative learning
        1. Act as representative 'expert' in field with knowledge of values/norms/foundational knowledge in field. Lead the group through discussion & contribute to knowledge community
          1. Engage in discourse - brainstorm, organize, synthesize
            1. Discussion is primary source of content,; textbooks, etc. are 'supplementary
              1. Asynchronous Discussion
                1. online asynchronous environments; primary learning objectives/outcomes are HOTS
                  1. Excellent for developing higher order thinking skills
                    1. Helping maintain intellectual rigor in discussions is time consuming; this model doesn't scale well. Also, in its original form, it doesn't support STEM well.. Discussion is a highly culturally contextualized activity. This could be challenging for cliverse classrooms.
            2. Notice that the teacher's primary focus is on cognitive development. Not much mention is made of social/motivational factors.
          2. Role of Teacher
            1. Role of Student
              1. Role of Content
                1. Instructional Methods Used
                  1. Context
                    1. Benefits
                      1. Challenges
            Show full summary Hide full summary

            Similar

            Instructional Design
            SONIA PATRICIA ZEPEDA MARROQUIN
            Freud's Theory of Personality
            09andreonei
            Intro to Horticulture Plant ID NC FFA 2015
            Bethany Davis
            U3: Instructional Outcomes and Underlying Theories (EDID6503 unit 3)
            Annika L-M
            intro to horticulture 2015 nc ffa pest ID
            Bethany Davis
            Psychodynamic Approach Practice Quiz
            Carly Eddy
            Six Design Rules for Maximum Motivation
            Brenda Parker
            Nursery and landscaping plant ID NC FFA 2016
            Bethany Davis
            U2: Instructional Approaches and Underlying Theories flash cards (EDID6503 unit 2)
            Annika L-M
            LÍPIDOS
            Mateo Salazar