Mind map
Scientific Research in Communication

Mind map: Scientific research in communication
Map content
Scientific Research in Communication
each of us can be considered
- Comm as the fundamental human activity
- Expertise” gained via human experience
- “commonsense understanding”
- Commonsense understanding has significant limitations
- Inconsistency
- Not generated systematically
- Bounded by our experience
- Self-bias
- Scientific Inquiry
- At its core, science is simply a means of inquiry—asking & answering questions
- Science—a systematic process of inquiry by which credible knowledge is generated
- Credible—worthy of being believed
- Why is scientific knowledge credible?
- Open —procedures & findings must be shared & are subject to scrutiny. Allows science to be conducted cumulatively
- Empirical & systematic —proceeds in a deliberate manner; knowledge based on systematic observation
- Can be tested empirically
- Over time science is self-correcting & self-improving
- Why is scientific knowledge credible?
- Credible—worthy of being believed
- Understanding Theory
- The credible knowledge produced by science is organized into theory, another oft-misunderstood term
- In everyday usage, we often take theory to mean guesswork which may be biased or unsubstantiated
- In scientific usage, the term does not have these negative connotations
- Scientifically, theoryis not an uninformed guess, but a framework for systematically organizing available info about various phenomena in such a way as to provide meaningful understanding & explanation
- The credible knowledge produced by science is organized into theory, another oft-misunderstood term
- Commonsense understanding has significant limitations
Communication Research Methods
- Experiments
- Use of a highly controlled situation in which a researcher can manipulate & measure the impact of variables of interest. Attempts to hold constant or control for any extraneous factors
- Advantages
- Observes behavior
- Tight control allows for precise focus
- Allows for logically strong conclusions
- Disadvantages
- Experimental scenarios may be unrealistic
- Tightly control of situations may not represent real world
- Resource/time intensive
- Advantages
- Use of a highly controlled situation in which a researcher can manipulate & measure the impact of variables of interest. Attempts to hold constant or control for any extraneous factors
- Survey Research
- info is obtained about individuals via standardized, indirect measures (e.g., questionnaires, interviews)
- info is obtained about individuals via standardized, indirect measures (e.g., questionnaires, interviews)
- Allow for inquiry in wide range of situations (e.g. actual experiences, hypothetical situations, etc
- Advantages
- Questioning (instead of observations) allows for broad inquiry
- Allows for large samples/efficient data collection
- Lower level of resources required
- Disadvantages
- Reliance on indirect measures
- Requires survey instrument to be: Clear Accurate Sensitive
- Less powerful logically then experiments
- info is obtained about individuals via standardized, indirect measures (e.g., questionnaires, interviews)
- Content analysis
- message content is measured, coded, & analyzed
- Communication centric (message content)
- Content is ‘coded’ to identify, tabulate, & categorize features/variables of interest
- Content is ‘coded’ to identify, tabulate, & categorize features/variables of interest
- Advantages
- Reveals actual comm patterns in social systems v. perceived comm
- Provides understanding of the place of a component in the larger system
- Communication patterns can be linked to other characteristics
- Disadvantages
- Requires data on comm interactions, typically drawn from Network questionnaire Archived comm records Monitoring of comm
- Does not consider message content
- message content is measured, coded, & analyzed
- Challenges
- Research into human behavior (social science) often requires exploring factors that must be inferred
- Operationalization–specifying procedures used to tangibly measure intangible variables of interest
- E.g., How might ‘affection’ between relational partners measured? --Use of a scale --Observation of displays of affection
- Not about determining the ‘best way’ but about making an informed choice
- Operationalization–specifying procedures used to tangibly measure intangible variables of interest
- A key issue is data collection is Sampling
- Population—total set of individuals or phenomena that meet a specified set of criteria
- Research Sample—population subset from which data is collected. Used as a basis for drawing inferences about the entire population. Shouldbe representative & of sufficient size
- Research into human behavior (social science) often requires exploring factors that must be inferred
- Conducting Scientific Research in Communication
- 1.Determine target & goals of the research effort
- Identify process, concept or real world situation of interest. Develop Research question(RQ) –a carefully constructed query which precisely specifies the goal of a research effort
- 3.Identify a (tentative) theoretical explanation based on review or insight. Often involves formulating hypotheses
- 4.Choose research methods—methodology (e.g. survey, experiment, etc) and procedures for making observations
- 2.Review existing knowledge—review previous and/or conduct informal observation
- 5.Collect data—recruit participants, records observations, or identify pre-existing data for analyses
- 6.Analyze data—in social science, typically via statistics
- 7.Interpret analysis & draw conclusions—Were predictions supported? What other explanations may exist? What are the implications for future research?
- 8.Report the results & the details of the study—vital for maintaining the open & cumulative aspects of scientific inquiry
- 1.Determine target & goals of the research effort
- Experiments
Information
- Description
- Mind Map on Scientific Research in Communication, created by chamalhe on 19/10/2014.
- Created by
- chamalhe
- Views
- 13
- Rating