AS Psychology: Eye Witness Testimony Revision

Mind Map by Asterisked, updated more than 1 year ago
Created by Asterisked over 5 years ago


Quick Revision mind map of studies into EWTs (reliability, affect of age, affect of anxiety)

Resource summary

AS Psychology: Eye Witness Testimony Revision
1 Loftus & Palmer (1974): Research of Automobile Destruction
1.1 Experiment One: LEADING QUESTIONS
1.1.1 Testing the reliability of the Eye Witness Testimony; can it be modified by leading questions?
1.1.2 IV: Verbs used in the question* (Smashed, Collided, Bumped, Hit, Contacted) // DV: Sample Group (7 Students) The more powerful the verb, the higher the 'mph' given. 'Smashed' had an average of 40.8mph, whilst 'Hit' averaged at 34.0mph
1.2.1 Can Misleading Information distort memory of events? IV: Original Question asked* // DV: Interval between Q and A (1 week) Verb originally used continued to distort memory. 32% of 'Smashed' Group reported seeing broken glass 14% of 'Hit' Group reported seeing broken glass = There was no broken glass.
1.3.1 PROS Realistic-looking footage used Has external validity Police officers know to ask less biased questions to Eye Witnesses
1.3.2 CONS No extraneous variables (Lab Experiment) American Students used: Can't generalise Contrasting arguments on why misleading Q's affected participants: Yuille & Cutshall (1986): Real life; shop owner shot and killed thief; 21 witnesses; 1 witness questioned by researchers; witness could accurately recall event 4 months after shooting
2 Effect of AGE on EWT
2.1 Cohen & Faulkner (1989)
2.1.1 Showed middle-aged and elderly PP's footage of a kidnapping: Group 1 - Received narrative account with accurate info // Group 2 - Received narrative account with misleading info // Elderly people were more susceptible to misleading info
2.1.2 Evaluation Lab Conditions: Participants aware of lack of consequence for actions or mistakes; lacks ecological validity Potential Investigator Effects: Tone/Body language of narrator could've influenced results
2.2 Poole & Lindsay (2001)
2.2.1 1. Children aged 3 - 8 shown science demonstration; parents then read them a book containing elements of the demonstration; children incorporated new information into original memory; 2. Children were asked where the info they received came from (source monitoring); Older children could tell apart whilst younger children were much poorer at it.
2.2.2 Evaluation Informed Consent: Received from parents + parental involvement = children around familiar people and less susceptible to investigator effects Application to real life: Ensure witness doesn't hear new information
3 Effect of ANXIETY on EWT
3.1 Yerkes-Dodson Law:
3.2 Loftus: Weapon Effect (1979) - Does weapon-induced anxiety take attention away from a person's appearance?
3.2.1 Participants sat outside lab, listening to conversation of people inside // Group 1: Peaceful conversation; man emerges w/greasy hands & pen // Group 2: Hostile conversation; sounds of damage to furniture; man emerges with bloodstained knife // 50 photos given to each group to recall face of man. G1 better than G2 (focus was on knife)
3.2.2 PRO: Genuine responses; ecological
3.2.3 CON: Lack of Extraneous Variables; no distractions from conversation; no ecological
3.3 Christianson & Hubinette (1993): Real events involving high levels of stress will create a more accurate, detailed and long lasting memory.
3.3.1 Survey; 110 participants - all witnesses of real bank robberies; 2 groups: 1)Bystanders & 2)Victims // 2) had better recollection than 1); 2) exposed to higher levels of stress. PRO: Real Life; real danger and real reactions; ecological CON: Unsure of distance between event & survey: 110 to all witness bank robberies = unlikely; memory potentially strengthened in various ways (i.e - police interviews)
Show full summary Hide full summary


Psychology A1
Ellie Hughes
Memory Key words
Sammy :P
History of Psychology
Biological Psychology - Stress
Gurdev Manchanda
Psychology subject map
Jake Pickup
Psychology | Unit 4 | Addiction - Explanations
Bowlby's Theory of Attachment
Jessica Phillips
The Biological Approach to Psychology
Gabby Wood
Cognitive Psychology - Capacity and encoding
Tess W
Chapter 5: Short-term and Working Memory
Psychology and the MCAT
Sarah Egan