Mind map
RM ch 4 + 11
Map content
RM ch 4 + 11
ethical principles
- respect for participants
- participant should decide whether or not to participate
- participant needs to know what the study is about + risks
- some groups (children, intellectually handicapped people, prisoners) should be protected in deciding to participate
- beneficence
- researchers should know beforehand: risks?
- what could the benefits be?
- can't withhold new treatments
- justice
- balance participants and people who benefit from the study
- don't disadvantage one group
- balance participants and people who benefit from the study
- respect for participants
guideline principles psychologists
- respect
- beneficence
- justice
- integrity
- educators: teach accurate things
- therapists: stay up to date with empirical evidence
- loyalty + responsibility
- psychologists aren't allowed to have sexual relationships with their students/clients
- teachers aren't allowed to have their student as a client
APA 10 specific standards/rules
- standard 8: researchers
- 8.01 there should be an institutional review board
- 8.02 informed consent
- paper/website on which study objectives, benefits and risks are stated
- 8.07 deception
- withholding info/lying
- 8.08 debriefing
- 8.10 data fabrication + data falsification
- fabrication: entering values that support your hypothesis
- falsification: influencing results by leaving some results out/influencing participants
- 8.11 plagiarism
- 8.09 taking good care of animals
- replacement
- find replacement for animals when possible
- refinement
- least stressful as possible
- reduction
- as few as possible
- replacement
- standard 8: researchers
internal validity threat
- design confounds
- selection effects
- order effects
- maturation threat
- change in behaviour over time bc getting better or growing up
- historical threat
- changes because something specific happened between pre and post test
- regression threats
- extreme results at time point 1 will become less extreme
- attrition
- reduction of participants that takes place before the research is finished
- test threat
- change in participant because they've done the test more than once
- instrumental threat
- when measuring instruments change with time
- three big threats for internal validity
- observer bias
- also construct validity
- demand characteristics
- placebo effects
- observer bias
null effects
- not enough difference between groups
- e.g. test that is too hard or too easy
- floor effects
- ceiling effects
- e.g. test that is too hard or too easy
- too much variance within groups
- noise/error variance
- the more groups overlap, the smaller the effect size
- can be caused by measurement error
- individual differences
- within-groups/matched pairs design solution
- situation noise
- distractions
- noise/error variance
- not enough difference between groups
Information
- Description
- Mind Map on RM ch 4 + 11, created by Sabine - on 18/11/2019.
- Created by
- Sabine -
- Views
- 0
- Rating