GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Mind map

Imputation

Rhianna Chell English

Map content

Imputation

  1. Patterns of Missingness

    • MAR
      • missing does not depend on missing value
      • depends on other characteristics
      • doesn't matter too much
      • people live alone, just have been missed by interviewer
    • NMAR
      • Hard to predict
      • working people- harder to get to, are out a lot
      • No info else where about what value should be
      • NO GENERAL SOLUTION
      • certain characteristics less likely to respond
      • lead to bias
  2. Non-response

    • levels
      • Unit
      • item
      • Occur at:
        • Household
        • Individual
        • item
    • Deal
      • Do nothing
        • Inconsistent estimates between analysts
        • Different assumptions
        • treat as missing data based on incomplete information
      • Adjust weights
        • at different levels
        • post-stratification
        • reduce or increase bias
        • difficult to ensure consistency for ad-hoc tests
      • Imputation
        • create internally consistent records
        • most feasible for NR
        • preferable
        • preserves relationship between variables
        • reduce NR data
        • increase complexity of variance
  3. How to choose

    • unknown rules
    • data is homogeneous
    • levels of erroneous/ missing data
    • kind of missingness
    • auxiliary variables
    • kind of analysis
    • timing or constraints
    • Run imputation study
      • create clean complete dataset
      • model NR patterns
      • make 'holes' to simulate missingness
      • find best method
      • run multiple times
      • measure
  4. Methods

    • Stochastic and Deterministic
      • Stochastic
        • Better Statistically, different results each time
        • data taken from random respondant
        • better for distribution
        • less for M M M
        • examples
          • from randomly selected case
          • random regression
          • random donor
      • Deterministic
        • same imputation every time
        • suitable when estimating certain types of aggregates
        • may not preserve shape of distribution
        • not suitable for estimating distribution parameters
        • underestimates variance if standard methods are used
        • examples
          • Deductive
            • based on logical relationships between variables
            • completed anytime
            • derived from edit rules
            • Example: LFS- 'child' < 16
          • mean, median or mode
            • Get more peaks
              • more with same value
            • estimation goes down
            • equivalent to applying same weight to everyone
            • reasonable totals
            • no distributions
            • last resort
          • apply ratio
          • donor methods
    • Ratio / Logistic
      • regression
        • y approx linear to x
        • impute missing y with:
      • ratio of means
      • means of ratio
      • trimming and weighting
        • R is sensitive to outliers
        • more robust R
        • trimming:removes top and bottom
        • Weighting: combines two growths,
          • R=wRt+(1-w)Rt-1
          • w = 0.8
    • Donor Imputation
      • Hot deck
        • common way to find donor
        • deck of completed
        • choice at ranodm
        • sequential
          • order responses
          • donor is most recent
          • PROBLEMS
            • too few
            • limited control
            • too many classes
            • multiple use of donor
        • Hierarchical
          • sorted by class
          • match as many variables as possible
          • preferable but less efficient
      • Nearest neighbour
        • set of donors with similar characteristics
        • calculate distance
        • choose at random from k smallest (k=5)
        • each variable given a weight
      • uses values from fully returned records
      • needs large pools of donors
      • each donor only once
      • preserves population distribution
      • usually stochastic
  5. Concept of Classes

    • WHEN MAR
    • can use dependence:
      • partition samples into classes
      • finds similar respondent to impute
    • classes:
      • equivalent to weighting
      • parameters of interest: domains, means or totals
      • social surveys use regression
    • CHAID
      • classification rule to split data, non overlapping
      • predefined rules
      • repeatedly splitting data into more subsets
      • Continuous until criteria is met

Information

Description
Mind Map on Imputation, created by Rhianna Chell on 13/05/2015.
Created by
Rhianna Chell
Views
1
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?