Genes may not directly cause aggression but
influence elements of our bio that contribute to it
Twin studies
MZ twins share 100% of their
genes while DZ only share 50%
If MZ twins are more alike in terms of their aggressive behaviour
then this should be due to genes rather than environment
Both types of twins share same environment as each
other but MZ twins are more genetically alike
Adoption studies
Help untangle relative contributions of
environment + heredity in aggression
If +ve correlation between aggressive behaviour in adopted
children + aggression in bio parents is identified, genetic effect is
implied
If +ve correlation between adoptee's aggressive behaviour +
rearing family is identified, then environmental effect Is implied
A02
Research support
Miles + Carey
Meta-analysis of 24 twin + adoption studies
Found significant genetic influence on aggressive behaviour
Found strong influence from both factors BUT that environmental
influence became less + genetic influence became greater as children grew
older
Problems of sampling
Convictions for violent crime are relatively few compared to vast
no of violent attacks by indivi. that never result in conviction
Represent small minority of those
regularly involved in aggressive
behaviour
Offenders designated as 'violent' aren't
necessarily the most serious, persistent offenders
A convicted murderer would be designated as violent for 1 offence
despite perhaps having otherwise has a lifetime free from crime
Might explain why so many studies have found
little or no evidence of heritability for violence
Family history
A01
FH studies demonstrate how
genetics can influence aggression
This is further supported by studies of adopted children
+ the aggression of their bio parents being identified
A02
Research support
Hutchings + Mednick
Found significant correlation between criminal convictions of bio fathers + no.
of criminal convictions of their sons who had been adopted into other families
Suggests genetic factor not just process of adoption as
correlation between adopted parents + children wasn't significat
Coccaro et al
Found genes were accountable for around 40% of differences between indivi. but
environment accounted for 50% of IDs in physical + 70% of IDs in verbal aggression
Genes account for whether or not person became aggressive,
but type of aggression = heavily influenced by environment
Role of MAOA
A01
No indivi. gene for aggression
has been identified in humans
Gene producing a protein called monoamine oxidase A
(MAOA) has been associated w/ aggression behaviour
Regulates metabolism of serotonin in brain, + low levels of
S are associated w/ impulsive + aggressive behaviours
A02
Research support
Bruner et al
Found many M members of Dutch family behaved
in a particularly violent + aggressive way
Found to have abnormally low levels of MAOA + a defect in this gene was later identified
Caspi et al
Found those w/ low levels of MAOA were more
likely to grow up to exhibit antisocial behaviour
Only if they had been maltreated as a child
Children w/ high levels who were maltreated + those w/ low levels
who were not maltreated didn't display antisocial behaviour
Shows it's the interaction between genes +
environments that determine behaviours
IDA's
Value of animal research
Young et al
Claim to have identified a genetic mutation
that causes violent behaviour in mice
Nicknamed 'fierce' it has a range of effects on mice
including extremely violent behaviour towards other mice
A counterpart of this gene does exist in
humans, although precise function is not
known
Real-world application
If people are predisposed towards aggression Qs
will arise about treatment of such behaviours
Some advocate genetic engineering + others even chemical castration
But ethical consequences must be taken into account because labelling indivi. as a
threat to society on basis of their genetic inheritance could be more damaging