Mind map
Courts + Juries
Map content
Courts + Juries
Types of trial
- Adversarial system
- 2 advocates represent parties' positions before impartial person/group
- Judges are impartial - fair play
- Inquisitorial system
- Court actively involved in investigating case facts
- Judge can be involved from early stages of police investigation
- Judge steers legal process
- Criminal defendant's first to testify
- Adversarial system
Methods of processing info
- Central route - people actively process all info pertinent to situation (argument quality)
- Peripheral route - use peripheral cues in making decision
- Status - well-respected = more likely to accept argument
Presenting evidence in court
- Structural constraints
- How/where etc evidence may be provided
- Order evidence is presented
- Prosecution gives case first
- Primacy-recency effect
- (Pennington + Hastie) Crucial to good narrative: ppts goals; physical/psychological conditions
- Structural constraints
Lawyers' tactics
- Discrediting strategies (personal attacks)
- Abstract language with child witnesses
- Plea bargaining - less likely to recommend it when evidence weak but likely long sentence
- Defendant as witness - view more posly
Juvenile offending
- Rehabilitation
- Less punitive
- Not viewed fully responsible for actions
- Risk factors
- Delinquency + violence
- Family/community context
- School problems
- Peers + gangs
- Sexual violence - reoffended associated with...
- Acquaintance of victim
- No treatment
- Being younger
- Delinquency + violence
Jury
- Lay person jury - 12 random people
- Escabinato jury - lay people + legal experts
- Selection
- UK: everyone has right to trial to peers
- Randomly select from electoral role: 18-70yo
- Mock trials; focus groups etc
- Over 50% don't attend
- Scientific jury selection: Voir Dire
- Trial within trial
- Hearing to determine admissibility of evidence + competency of witness/juror
The trial
- Pre-trial publicity can bias jury
- Inadmissible evidence can affect jury even if retracted
- Defendant's attractiveness + socio-economic status influence jurors
- Subjective decision
Jury decision rules
- UK: combined decision rule (unanimity then 10/12 majority)
- (Ziesel) Greater size of jury, greater chance of hung jury
Expert witnesses
- (Groscup) 1/4 expert witnesses in US from social/behavioural sciences
- Can't offer evidence outside expertise
- Daubert criteria - whether technique/criteria is verifiable. accepted in scientific community + likelihood of error in study
- Problems with psychologists
- Hard to reduce complex matters to fixed characteristics
- Hard for capacity of jury to understand
- Weight of opinion e.g. risk assessments, likelihood to reoffend
Information
- Description
- Mind Map on Courts + Juries, created by Emma Freeman on 24/05/2015.
- Created by
- Emma Freeman
- Views
- 1
- Rating
More on Psychology in the Courts