Argue process of acquiring gender-relevant info
happens before gender consistency is achieved
Claim basic gender identity is sufficient for child to identify him/herself
as B/G + take an interest in what behaviours are appropriate
Suggest how acquisition of stereotypes affects later
behaviour, especially in terms of memory + attenetion
A02
Gender constancy VS schemata
Kohlberg claims children can't absorb gender-relevant knowledge until gender constancy, whereas
Martin + Halverson say it starts as soon as child has some awareness of which group they belong to
Ruble et al
Suggest constancy is 'one of most compelling yet
controversial ideas in gender research'
However a no of studies don't
support Kohlberg's idea
Bussey + Bandura
Found B + G age 4 said they felt good about playing w/ gender-appropriate
toys + awful about playing w/ gender-inappropriate ones
Kohlberg would suggest this couldn't happen until later
Schemas
A01
Children learn schemas related to gender through their interaction
w/ other children + adults as well as TV programmes or videos
Schema or stereotypes have function of organising
+ structuring other info presented to children
Learn about what toys are appropriate, what clothes to wear + so on
These GS are like 'naïve' theories about
appropriate behaviour for M + W
A02
Research support
For gender stereotypes without constancy
Martin + Little
Found children under age of 4 showed no signs of
gender stability let alone signs of constancy
But did display strong gender stereotypes about what B + G were permitted to do
Shows they have acquired info about gender
roles before Kohlberg suggested
Ingroup + outgroup schema
A01
Ingroup refers to groups w/
which person identifies
Being a G means you identify
yourself w/ that group
Also in many other groups (town you
come from, boy bands you like etc)
Once child has identified w/ group this leads them to
+ve evaluate their own group + -ve evaluate outgroup
Evaluation motivates child to be like their own
group + avoid behaviours of other group
Leads them to actively seek
info about what ingroup does
From early age, children focus on ingroup schemas + avoid
behaviours that belong to outgroup schemas
A02
Effect on memory
If gender schemas are
important in acquiring
info about ingroup
gender then we would
expect children to pay
greater attention to
info consistent w/
gender schemas + to
remember this info
better
Martin + Halverson
Found when children were asked to recall pics of people, children under 6
recalled more of gender-consistent ones than gender-inconsistent ones
Also found when children were asked about the gender-inconsistent
pics they distorted the info so that it was gender-consistent in their
mind
Bradbard et al
Told 4-9 year olds that certain gender
neutral items were either B or G items
Ppts took greater interest in toys labelled as ingroup
1 week later, they were able to
remember more details about ingroup
objects
Shows how gender schema are related in
particular to memory (organisation of info)
Resilience of gender beliefs
A01
Important aspect of GST is
it can explain power of GB
GB lead children to hold very fixed gender
attitudes because they ignore info
encountered that isn't consistent w/ ingroup
info
For example
If a B sees a film w/ a M nurse, info is ignored because M isn't
behaving consistently w/ boys ingroup schema - therefore, B
doesn't alter his existing schema
In this way gender schema have a
profound effect on what is remembered
A02
Resilience of
children's stereotypes
Explains why children are frequently highly
sexist despite best efforts of parents
because they actively seek to acquire
gender-appropriate schema
Hoffman
Reports children whose mothers work have less stereotyped
views of what men do, suggesting children aren't entirely
fixed in views but are receptive to some gender inconsistent
ideas
IDA - Real-world application
Fact GS lead to misremembering or even distorting info has
important implications for efforts to reduce gender stereotypes
Means even when children are exposed to
counter-stereotypes they don't remember them accurately
Suggests use of counter-stereotypes may
not be best way to reduce children's GS
IDA -Freudian approach
Proposed around age of 3, B becomes
sexually aware + attracted to mother
Makes him wish his father dead so he can have his mother to himself
Such wishes make B feel guilty but ultimately are
resolved through gender identification w/ father
If conflict isn't resolved B may have gender identity probs
Similar process happens in G
Interesting to note their are some similarities between this + GST
Critical age is closer to GST than Kohlberg + F suggested identification w. ingroup was important to taking on gender attitudes
Compromise
Stangor + Ruble
Proposed means of unifying GST + Kohlberg
Argue that GS + GC may represent different processes
GS concerned w/ organisation of info +
therefore should affect cognitive variables
such as memory, whereas GC more concerned
w/ motivation + thus should be associated w/
things like activity choice
Tested children aged 4-10 years
Found (a) memory for gender-consistent pics increased w/
age + (b) that preference for same-sex toys increased w/
increased gender constancy