306434
Description
Mind Map by terinamaraea, updated more than 1 year ago
|
Created by terinamaraea
over 10 years ago
|
|
Nuisance
- Who can sue
- Hunter v Canary Wharf
- Legally protected interest in tort
- Legally protected interest in tort
- Hunter v Canary Wharf
- Elements
- BNZ v Greenwood (reasonable test)
- Abnormal sentitivity
- Bloodworth v Cormack
- not consideration
- not consideration
- Bloodworth v Cormack
- nature of harm in relation to locality
- Colls v home
- industrial v residential
- industrial v residential
- Colls v home
- Time, duration and intensity
- Matania v National
- unreasonable at unpleasant times
- unreasonable at unpleasant times
- Matania v National
- Social utility and public benefit
- St Helens
- St Helens
- Abnormal sentitivity
- BNZ v Greenwood (reasonable test)
- Who is liable
- Sedleigh Denfield v O'Callaghan
- must be in possession
- Matheson v Northcote
- liable for school kids
- liable for school kids
- BNZ v Greenwood
- deflection of sunlight
- deflection of sunlight
- must be in possession
- Sedleigh Denfield v O'Callaghan
- Remedies
- Injunctions
- Mandatory
- Prohibitory
- Mandatory
- Self-help
- abatement
- remove source of harm
- remove source of harm
- expulsion
- abatement
- Injunctions
- Public Nuisance
- AG v PYA Quarries
- Nuisance widespread
- Nuisance widespread
- R v Rimmington
- affect the community
- affect the community
- AG v PYA Quarries
- Rylands v Fletcher
- Test - strict liabilty
- Elements
- Defences
- Elements
- Test - strict liabilty
Want to create your own Mind Maps for free with GoConqr? Learn more.