Mind map
Trademark [TMA]
Map content
Trademark [TMA]
(1) Introduction
- Indicates trade origin of goods - necessary to distinguish between other businesses
- Monopoly right - owner has exclusive right to use the trademark [s. 9(1)]
- 3rd party will therefore be liable for using C's trademark, even if innocent infringement
(2) Registrability
- (i) Does the mark fall within the definition [s. 1(1)]
- Sign (anything that can be apprehended by the senses)
- Capable of graphic representation
- Must be clear, precise, accessible and intelligible, such that the scope of the owner's rights can be determined
- Trade origin must be capable of being distinguished from its competitors
- (ii) Are there grounds on which registration should be refused [s. 3]
- Does it meet the definition [s. 3(1)(a)]
- Does the mark have distinctive character [s. 3(1)(b)]
- Is the mark exclusively descriptive of the goods/services provided [s. 3(1)(c)]
- Is the mark customary in that trade [s. 3(1)(d)]
- Failing the gounds under 3(1)(b-d) will not be fatal if the mark has acquired distinctiveness over time (i.e. the public has learned to read it as a trademark)
- If the mark uses a 3d shape, must not resemble the nature of the goods themselves [s. 3(2)]
- Must not infringe public morality/policy or be deceptive [s. 3(3)]
- (iii) Are there grounds on which an existing trademark owner could object to registration [s. 5]
- Are there identical marks already on the register for the same goods or services [s. 5(1)]
- In which case confusion is assumed
- If there is a similar mark, would this confuse the public [s. 5(2)] - consider:
- Comparison of marks
- Comparison of goods/services
- Likelihood of confusion
- Is the mark identical or similar to a mark previously registered that is for entirely different goods/services [s. 5(3)] - consider:
- Reputation (do a significant part of the public know about the original mark)
- Consequence (does the mark cause detriment to the original mark's distinctive character, detriment to its reputation, unfair advantage, etc.)
- Applicant must prove they have due cause to use identical/similar mark
- If the mark could be actionable under the law of passing off, cannot be registered [s. 5(4)]
- Are there identical marks already on the register for the same goods or services [s. 5(1)]
- (i) Does the mark fall within the definition [s. 1(1)]
(3) Registration Procedure
- Apply to the Register at the IPO [s. 32-34]
- Check trademarks journal [s. 37-38]
- See whether application is opposed [s. 38(2)]
- Post-registration
- Must be renewed every 10 years from date of registration or will lapse [s. 42-43]
- Becomes property right of owner - can now be assigned and security can be granted over it [s. 2] [s. 9] [s. 22]
- Can be subsequently revoked (removed from the register) if not used for 5 years or loses distinctiveness by becoming generic - or if found that it should never have been registered in the first place [s. 46-47]
(4) Infringement [s. 10]
- (i) Is C registered owner of the trademark
- (ii) Has the trademark lapsed
- (iii) Has the mark been used in the course of trade without the owner's consent [s. 9(1)]
- Examples of use listed in s. 10(4)
- (iv) Compare the original and potentially infringing marks and apply the relevant provision of s. 10(1-3)
- (v) Defences
- Statutory
- Bona fide use of D's own name/address [s. 11(2)(a)]
- Use as indication of characteristics [s. 11(2)(b)]
- Use as indication of purpose [s. 11(2)(c)]
- Use of earlier trademark in a particular locality [s. 11(3)]
- Applies to small traders, whose prior rights the infringer could not have been aware of
- Other
- Confusion is unlikely/dissimilar marks
- Argue C's original mark is invalid/should not have been registered
- Statutory
- (vi) Remedies
- Civil [s. 14-19]
- Injunction
- Delivery up
- Damages/account
- Criminal [s. 92, 94 & 95]
- Civil [s. 14-19]
Information
- Description
- LPC CLIP Mind Map on Trademark [TMA], created by jc94055z on 10/08/2015.
- Created by
- jc94055z
- Views
- 2
- Rating