contact is essential in order for attraction to take
place
Relashionships were generaly formed between people who lived near each other
Bossard (1932) found that more than half of 5,000 couples who applied to get married in
Philidelphia lived a few minutes walk of each other
Festinger(1950) compared friendships formed my students in halls of
recidence and found people were far more likley to be friends with thoes who
lived on the same floor or corridor than thoes from the floor above
Physical apperance
Physical appearance plays some role in attraction
A combination of architectural factors (facial features, body size, shape) and dynamic factors (dress sense,talks and
their facial expressions)
Important that the two people have a similar level of attractivness
Murstein (1972) was one of the first to note this effect he termed the match hypothesis.Murstein
argued that whilst we might desire the most physically attractive partner , in reality we know that
we are unlikely to get or keep them so we look for someone of a similar level of attractiveness.This makes us likely to suffer rejection.
Murstein studied 99 couples who were dating and compared them with randomly
paired couples.He found that the real couples were consistently rated as more alike
in levels of attractiveness
Sivlerman (1971) supported these findings by rating couples in bars.The matching concept
can also be applied to friends.McKillip and Riedel(1993) found that friend were also fairly
closley matched in levels of physical attractivness
Similarity of attitudes and social backgrounds
Once two people have started talking to each other,interests,
hobbies and attitudes become important
Byrne proposed the law of attraction, although some feel that he over estimated the
importance of shared attitudes,there is nodoubt that they play a role in attraction
communication is easier when to people share attitued and interests are important so spending time
together is easy and rewarding
conversely differences in attitudes can lead us to dislike people (Singh and Ho 2000)
a similar social back ground is also important in terms of
education and socio-economic class is important
Kendel(1978) found that teenage pairs of close friends were simmilar in many respects including ethinc background, religion
and economic background of their parents
Peplau(1976) also found similarity of race, class
and religion in dating couples and in pairs of friends
the study of relation formation identifies many factors which could be
involvedd.However it can imply that we have no free will over
relashionships; that they are determined by these various factors are
out or our controll.As we have a strong sense of free will wen it
comes to relashionships, this is a critisicsm of such a deterministic
approach
The formation of relationships
Filter Model Kerckhoff and Davis (1962)
relationships develop through three filters, Kerckhoff and davis refered to the
field of availables as possible people that we could have a relationship with,
then we filter out theese potential partners for different reasons and this is
gradually snarrowed down to a field of desirables ( potential partners)
The first filter involves social/demographic variables.this filter exerts its influence often with out us
being aware of it. there is a fairly small amount of people who are from similar
educational,economical,social back ground from which potential partners are chosen. individual
characteristics play a small role at this stage
second filter is simmilarity of attitudes and values after they start going out is belifes and ideas are simmilar easy
to communicate if this is different relationship will not progress
third filter complementary of emotional needs in long term relationship how 2 people fit together and meet each
others needs