GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Mind map

Analogy and Aquinas

Scarlett Swift Philosophy A level English

Mind map about Analogy and Aquinas: describing God, analogy of attribution, analogy of proportion, strengths and weaknesses

Mind map: Analogy and Aquinas

Map content

Analogy and Aquinas

  1. Analogy

    • Univocal Language
      • God is good in the same way that humans are
      • Aquinas rejected its use as God is perfect. Therefore, humans can never be good in the same way God is.
    • Equivocal Language
      • God is good a completely different way to humans
      • Aquinas rejected its use as it would mean that we could not claim to know anything about him
    • Overview
      • An attempt to explain the meaning of something which is difficult to understand by comparing it to something else that is more in our reference frame
      • Aquinas' doctrine of analogy follows from his rejection of both univocal and equivocal language to describe God
      • He explained this by asking "What happens when we use good, loving, merciful, to describe God?" - neither are much use
  2. Describing God

    • Aquinas believed that God should be thought of analogically
      • Making comparisons with God in order to describe his nature
    • Analogy of attribution
      • The view that God is the cause of all good things in humans
    • Analogy of proportion
      • all good qualities belong to god are in proportion to humans
  3. Analogy of attribution

    • A quality is given to one things because it caused by another
      • The bread is good, the baker is good
        • the word 'good is used in both cases, with similar but not the same meaning. Bread can be good - soft tasty or light. The baker isn't soft or tasty but has the qualities of a good baker
    • Aquinas
      • gain an understanding of God by considering his role as his creator
      • If God made the world then we could expect the world to reflect God's qualities in some way
      • If we know what it is to call a human being 'good', we must assume we can use the term 'good' to describe Him
      • We do not have an exact idea of what God's goodness is, we can deduce from the world that God is good.
      • The medicine is healthy, the urine is healthy
        • the medicine being healthy is the cause as to why the urine is healthy
        • Urine is only healthy because health comes from the medicine
        • Medicine is healthy not just because it promotes health, but also it is in itself healthy
  4. Analogy of Proportion

    • words relate to objects which are different in proportion
    • a clever dog and a clever scientist,
      • the word 'clever' is used in proportion
        • the dog is clever as dogs go, the scientist is clever in comparison with other people
    • Aquinas
      • We can use terms such as 'loving' and 'faithful' when we speak about God
        • We have to recognise that God's love and faithfulness are on an infinitely vaster scale than our own
          • 'God is good', 'good' is used to indicate that God measures up to what is for God to be God
      • John Hick
        • Baron von Hugel's example of 'faithfulness'
          • A word that we might use of a dog, a human or God
            • Comparing faithfulness that humans have to that of a dog, the dog's faithfulness is limited
              • we assert that God is faithful, we use the word in a way that makes our faithfulness tiny by comparison
  5. Strengths

    • avoids the problems of using univocal and equivocal language to describe God
    • helps humans to speak meaningfully about God by comparing him to contingent things
    • helps to preserve the mysterious nature of God
    • closely resembles how theists speak about God (as opposed to the Via Negative)
  6. Weaknesses

    • leaves us with a limited understanding of God
    • may not be possible to make a comparison between necessary and contingent beings
    • wouldn't it be easier to just accept that God's transcendent nature means that not even analogy could describe him?
    • Theists normally make religious claims literally, not analogically

Information

Description
A level Philosophy (Religious Language) Mind Map on Analogy and Aquinas, created by Scarlett Swift on 20/06/2022.
Created by
Scarlett Swift
Views
0
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?