hemispheric lateralisation = looks at the
sole function of each hemisphere
left hand side more dominant for language
brocas research
damage in one part of the hemisphere
has a different impact
leads to the same area
being damaged in right
hemisphere
corpus collosum = bundle of nerves ( fibers)
can be cut during surgery for epilepsy severe cases only
stops electrical activity from seizure spreading to
other hemisphere a form of communication
these people are referred to split brain patients as
hemispheres= not attached
roger sperry and michael gazzaniga
(1967)
hemispheric lateralisation
right visual goes to left hemisphere and left visual goes to
right hemisphere
method of testing communication from left to right
picture or word shown to left visual then processed in right hemisphere
patient wouldnt be able to say due to no lang centres in the right hemisphere
instead draw it
picture/word shown to right visual field info processed by left hemisphere
patient can say what it is as lang centres in left hemisphere
R hemispheres responsible = visual- spatial processing facial recognition
L hemisphere responsible = speech and language
Evaluation
Language not restricted to left hemisphere. Initially right hemi not handle basic
lang. gazzangia (1998) disproved. Patient J.W developed ability speak from R
hemi.ability speak about info presented to left and the right side of brain. Not
universal phenomenal. Poor sample lacks validity
Lateralisation changes with age.across
many types of tasks many brain areas.
Lateralised patterns in younger
individuals tend to switch to bilateral
patterns in healthy adults. Due to
processes not being. Fixed.
Deterministic,experimentally reductionist
Limitations split brain research.procedure
rarely carried out research becoming out of
date. Andrewes (2001) claims patients used
suffer from pre existing physical disorders
that make the surgery necessary. We can’t
generalise to ovulation lacks reductionism
and generalisability