KOHLBERG: Gen. Dev. occurs as children (C) mature and interact with the
environment, forming an increasingly complex+accurate understanding
of their bodies+the world around them
3 STAGES
GENDER IDENTITY (GI) (2-3.5) CORRECT
LABELLING: C recog. that s/he is
boy/girl, can label others as B/G, make
judgements on ext. features such as
clothes and hair
GENDER STABILITY (GS) (3.5-4.5) BASIC
AWARENESS: can correctly answer
Q's, "When you grow up, will you be
M/D?" Heavily influenced by ext.
features. I.e. boy says he is a G if
wearing dress.
GENDER CONSTANCY (GC) (4.5-7)
GEN WON'T CHANGE: C realises
that someone stays the same
biological sex even though diff.
clothes or diff. hair. BEM-to
reach this level of und. basic
genital diff. between M/F
Once C has strong sense of
gender is permanent (often
5), highly motivated to
behave in way that is exp. of
them, predicts that they pay
att. to same-sex role
models+show gender
appropriate beh. (GAB)
Eval: I-Evid. for stages.
E-SLABY+FREY-Q's+Observed children of
various ages, findings supp. E-C were shown
film, M+W on opp. sides. Children rated as
having (+)GC=(+) watching same gender
models. E-Appropriate for age group,
simple+unobtrusive-ethically acceptable as
harmless.E-MUNROE-found sequence of GD
consistent across other cultures (Kenya,
Nepal, Belize, Samoa) L-This suggests that dev.
on gen. is universal+TF further supports
KOHLBERG's theory of GD.
Eval: I-Conflicting evid.
E-MARTIN+LITTLE-Measured gender concepts,
sex-type preferences & stereotypes in 3-5 year
olds. Found that despite basic gender und.,
very strong gender stereotypes about what
M+F were permmited to do. Goes against
Kohlberg's theory as it suggests only basic
understanding needed. E-THOMPSON-children
as young as 2 could categorise items as
belonging to either M/F, thus showing
understanding of gender before constancy.
L-Raises doubts as to when a child becomes
concerned about GAB.
GENDER SCHEMA THEORY (GST): Sugg. children are motivated to
begin to acquire knowledge about their gender much earlier
than exp.
Gender Schema (GS) begins to develop as soon as
child notices between M/F, knows own gender+can
label between 2 groups. Normally achieved by 2 or
3
Begin with simple In-group &
out-group schema, contains gen.
info. about M+F categories. I.e.
train=M, Long hair=F
4-6 child forms an own-schema,
based on beh., traits+roles app.
for them. Will develop with exp.
I.e. doll is for girl.
Start off very basic, M+F. As more exp.
then 'Things M wears' to things M do'.
Eventually will be able to dev. new
categories. "Things M+F do" allows
children to store new info.+interpret
new experience. States that will become
less stereotyped+more flexible in their
views of gender as they get older
Eval: I-Supp. research from MARTIN.
E-Showed toys to children aged 4-5 years,
informed whether it was M or F toy before
being allowed to choose. FOUND: If given
M label= M choose. If F label=F choose.
Supp. the idea affect our behaviour.
E-Cannot be entirely sure, may be social
desirability, please adults. L-TF while this
research supp. GST, method. issues such
as demand characteristics undermine
validity of evid.
Eval: I-PA E-LIBEN+SIGNORELLA-showed
young C pictures of adults engaging in
activities associated with opp. sex. For
example male nurse, when Q'd later on,
insisted F. E-Studying gender
stereotypes provides useful ino about
how our society perceives M+F. They can
inform policies to iron out
marginalisation of women/ L-TF GST is
useful because it can bring about social
change.
Eval: I-Conflicting evid. E-Psych exp. of gender close
relationship between gender awareness=gender typed
behaviour, but research does not find this so. ARCHER Girls
tend to have more flexible concepts of gender than boyss,
tendency to engage in behaviours associated with boys. E-ID
can be explained by ALT exp. BENENSON-Suggests that
there may be a evol basis for stronger gender schemata in
boys, in our evol past, M more under pressure to form
bonds for success in hunting. Meant survival of whole
group. L-TF Psych exp. are gender biased, suggesting that
M+Fdevelop understanding in similar way, however evol.
theory suggests there may be imp. gender diff. that need to
be taken into account.