Mind map
Teacher Made Tests
Map content
Teacher Made Tests
planning classroom test
- purpose of test
- what is to be tested
- table of specifications
- when to test
- kinds of questions to use
- how many questions
- level of difficulty
- test format
selecting and preparing test questions
- essay questions
- restricted response
- establish limits for form and scope
- measure comprehensions, application and analysis
- extended response
- no limits on form and scope
- recall, evaluate, organize and present factual knowledge
- skills in synthesis and evaluation are tested
- advantages
- comparatively easier to prepare
- students supply answer
- measure higher order thinking
- stimulate creativity and freedom of expression
- disadvantages
- sample content is limited
- vulnerable to unreliable scoring
- student may not understand question
- unsure how to respond
- great deal of time to read and score
- writing essay quesions
- 1. reserve adequate time to prepare
- 2. precisely define direction and scope
- 3. indicate point value of each question
- 4. use to measure objectives that cannot be measured as well in other formats
- 5. use many questions requiring brief answers
- 6. consider time needed for response and time available for test
- 7. adapt length/complexity of response to maturity of students
- 8. do not provide optional questions
- 9. decide in advance how will be scored
- 10. prepare scoring key
- evaluating essay questions
- analytical method
- rating method
- guideline
- 1. check scoring key against responses
- read a few randomly selected papers to determine appropriateness of scoring key
- make adjustments as needed
- 2. score spelling, penmanship, grammar, writing style independently of subject matter
- 3. score responses anonymously
- conceal student's name when evaluating responses
- 4. evaluate one question for all students at a time
- 5. shuffle papers before grading each question
- 6. score all responses to one questions without interruption
- 7. conduct 2 readings of the test and use average as final score
- 8. provide comments and correct answers
- 9. set realistic standards
- 1. check scoring key against responses
- restricted response
- objective questions
- multiple choice
- stem
- problem
- responses
- suggested answers
- distracters
- incorrect responses
- direct question format
- incomplete statement format
- advantages
- test in several levels of cognitive domain
- scored quickly and accurately
- relatively efficient
- number of questions asked in given amount of time
- can test wide range of topics in short amount of time
- not significantly affected by guessing
- disadvantages
- difficult to construct
- plausible sounding distracters are hard to find
- tendency to write only factual recall questions
- test wise student perform better than non test wise students
- guidelines
- 1. use direct question or incomplete statement
- direct question often preferable
- 2. write in clear and simple language
- 3. make response choices brief
- 4. one correct or best answer to each
- 5. incomplete statement, place choices at end
- 6. 4 to 5 response choices
- 7. only plausible response choices
- 8. list response in vertical, easy to read format
- 9. use letters for response choices
- 10. avoid patters of answers
- 1. use direct question or incomplete statement
- stem
- matching
- set of directions
- list of stems or numbered items
- list of choices
- well suited to test knowledge in terms
- definitions
- dates
- names
- events
- other simple relationships
- advantages
- many questions asked in limited amount of time
- easy to score
- test material can be broad
- guessing is limited
- disadvantages
- serial memorization rather than association
- difficult to get clusters of questions sufficiently alike that common set of responses can be used
- difficult to avoid giving clues
- too many items can be confusing
- not well adapted to measure understanding of concepts
- guidelines
- 1. list homogeneous premises on left/ options to be matched on right
- 2. list in logical or sytsematic order
- 3. keep relatively short
- 5 to 8 items is optimumal
- 4. provide extra responses
- 5. stems longer more involved statements/ responses are short and simple
- 6. number each stem and use capital letters for responses
- true/false
- advantages
- good for poor readers
- cover large amount of content
- high reliability
- scored quickly and reliabily
- adaptable to most subject areas
- measure higher mental processes of understanding, application and interpretation
- disadvantages
- influenced by guessing
- susceptible to ambiguity and misinterpretation
- causing low reliability
- lend to cheating more than other types
- some statements are not entirely true or false
- determiners often added
- guidelines
- 1. be certain item is absolutely true or false
- 2. avoid loosely worded/ambiguous statements
- 3. highlight central point by placing in prominent position
- 4. avoid negative statements
- 5. avoid true statements longer than false statements
- 6. avoid disproportionate # of true or false
- advantages
- short answer
- advantages
- students less likely to guess correct answer
- easy to construct
- disadvantages
- difficult to score
- emphasis on vocab and recall
- guidelines
- 1. direct question better than completion statement
- 2. use to measure recall only
- 3. lead to one or two specific words or phrases
- 4. completion- place blanks near end of sentence
- 5. completion- no more than 1 or 2 completions on one test item
- 6. leave enough clues so students know answer selected is correct
- advantages
- multiple choice
- essay questions
assembling the test
- grouping and arranging test items
- all questions in one format should be grouped together
- fewest sets of directions
- easiest for students
- sequence when using 2 or more formats
- 1. true/false
- 2. matching
- 3. short answer
- 4. multiple choice
- 5. interpretive exercises
- 6. essay
- within each format, questions related to same objective should be grouped
- within each format, arranged in order of ascending difficulty
- all questions in one format should be grouped together
- writing test directions
- guidelines
- 1. specific set of written directions for each format
- 2. indicate basis
- 3. indicate how to record answers
- 4. indicate point value of each question
- 5. indicate purpose, time available, should students guess
- guidelines
- formatting and reproducing
- guidelines
- 1. space items to be easily read, answered and scored
- 2. # consecutively throughout
- 3. generous borders
- 4. stems and options on one page
- 5. matching- list premises and choices on same page
- 6. t/f, matching and multiple choice most convenient
- 7. avoid definite response pattern
- 8. one side of page should be used for responses to all objective questions
- 9. use computer to make most legible quality print
- guidelines
- grouping and arranging test items
administering the test
- guidelines
- 1. comfortable testing conditions
- 2. no warning about importance of test
- 3. avoid testing before or after long vaction
- 4. reminders for time remaining
- 5. discourage cheating through careful proctoring
- 6. do not talk unnecessarily before test
- 7. minimum interrumptions
- 8. avoid hints about test items
- 9. indicate what students are to do upon test completion before the start of the test
- guidelines
scoring the test
- answer key should be prepared and checked in advance
Information
- Description
- DOC1 (11 Assessing Student Performance) Mind Map on Teacher Made Tests, created by Dylan Teresa on 15/08/2016.
- Created by
- Dylan Teresa
- Views
- 0
- Rating