Mind map
Fraud Case Law
Map content
Fraud Case Law
Manifest Shipping Co v Uni-Polaris Shipping Co 2001 The Sea Star
- Unseaworthy 2 similar losses - reports undisclosed
- Duty of UGF throughout policy; includes claims
- if fraud unsuccessful; lose nothing NOT!
- Previous genuine claims not affected; All of fraud claim struck out plus any subsequent genuine claims
- if fraud unsuccessful; lose nothing NOT!
- Duty of UGF throughout policy; includes claims
- Unseaworthy 2 similar losses - reports undisclosed
Black King Shipping Co v Massie 1985 Litsion Pride
- Snuck in/out of Gulf
- UGF X ab initio
- Superseded by Ins Act
- UGF X ab initio
- Snuck in/out of Gulf
Galloway v GRE 1999
- Genuine & 10% fraud loss; computer
- Whole claim avoided
- Genuine & 10% fraud loss; computer
AXA v Gottleib & Gottleib 2005
- 4 claims; 1st & 2nd fraudulent documents; 3rd & 4th genuine
- 4 payments made before fraud discovered
- 4 claims; 1st & 2nd fraudulent documents; 3rd & 4th genuine
Aviva v Brown 2011
- Fraudulent element need not be substantial; but not immaterial or unsubstantial
Summers v Fairclough Homes - TP claim
- Held fraudster could keep any honest parts of his/her claim,
Fari v Homes for Haringey - TP claim
- Grossly exaggerated injury - contempt of court. Jail sentence; claim thrown out
Orakapo v Barclays Ins Services 1995 Exaggerated Claim for loss of rent; only 3 of 13 bedsits occupied
Nsubuga
- Property & BI claim. Fraud: stock
- Whole policy voided not just one section
- Property & BI claim. Fraud: stock
Agapitos; fraudulent device
Mpoznu Hussein Skeikh
- Criminal Justice & Courts Act 2015
- Entire claim dismissed if dishonest.
- Criminal Justice & Courts Act 2015
Information
- Description
- Professional Claims handling Mind Map on Fraud Case Law, created by Judith West on 11/29/2016.
- Created by
- Judith West
- Views
- 0
- History
-
- Created by Judith West · Mar 2, 2015
- Copied by Judith West · Nov 29, 2016
- Rating