GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Mind map

Aphasia 2b - Plasticity

Heather Snaith Aphasia English

Aphasia 2b - Plasticity

Map content

Aphasia 2b - Plasticity

  1. Raymer et al. (08)

    • 1. Timing of treatment delivery
    • 2. Use it or lose it
    • 3. Generalisation (trans of treat fx)
    • 4. Intensity of treatment
  2. Kleim & Jones (08): 10 Principles of Neuroplasticity

    • See Isobel's summary sheet...
    • 1. Use it or lose it: Neurological functions which aren't utilsed may decline
      • Evidence to support the use of language skills to maintain them
      • Cortical neurons reduced in vis cortex for kittens deprived of light
      • Other sensory modalities may take over
        • fMRI revealed blind Pat, visual cortex active in tactile task, e.g. braile
      • Tube feeding and neural circuitry in swallowing (Robbins et al 07)
    • 2. Use it and improve it: Training in a specific function is likely to improve that function
      • N. Plastcitiy is basis of all learning
      • Therapy is valid
      • See Raymer et al. (07)
      • Housing animals in complex environments post injury can improve functional recovery
      • Acrobatic training, vs normal exercise in rats (post lesion) shown to enhance synaptic pasticity in contralateral hemishere
    • 3. Specificity: Training to drive plasticity in a linguistic area (believed to have regional specificity), needs to be specific to that area - the nature of the experience drives the pasticity
      • Don't expect generalisation to always occur! But training in one modality may change a limited subset of neural circuitry involved in another
      • Humans trained to make skilled ankle movements vs those trained to repeat unskilled movements exhibited better cortico-spinal excitability
        • Rates to CATE / Transference.
        • Reach and grab tasks in rats = denritic growth in motor cortex (contra lat to trained limb) but only suble fx on ipsilateral cortex
    • 4. Repetition matters: In order for plastic changes to resist decay, training must go beyond the acquisition of skill - repetition beyond where might appear necessary.
      • Keep going!
      • Rats on skilled reaching task: demo beh changes quickly, however synapse number, strength and map reorganisation does not alter until several days of practise
    • 5. Intensity matters: In order for neuroplastic changes to occur training needs to be provided over an intense period. However, too much training can overuse impaired extemities
      • Boghal et al (03): Intense training over a short period approx 8 hours / week for 11 weeks was more effective than training over a longer period, approx 2 hrs / wk for 22 weeks
      • Get an app!
        • Don't overdo it
      • Animals trains to perform 400 reaches / day vs 60 / day showed an increase in synapse numbers
        • Extreme use during early vulnerable period unwise: Forcing rats to rely on impaired forelimb frst 7 days after smot cort lesion, exaggerated tissue loss & worsened outcomes (compared to rats allowed both limbs)
    • 6. Time matters: Different changes occur at diff times during taining
      • Therapy should be delivered within particularly sensitive time windows ideally - acute post injury period
        • But any therapy is better than no therapy
        • However, starting too soon may result in lack of retention
      • Motor skill training: Gene expression first, synapse formation, map reorganisation
      • Raymer et al (2007) – aphasia treatment initiated in the chronic phase resulted in major functional improvements (from meta-analysis), but the greatest improvements occurred when therapy started in the acute post-injury period.
      • Further research needed to know how time windows in rats relate to humans
    • 7. Salience matters: Emotional stimulus used in training are likely to induce greater N.P. changes
      • If it doesn't mean anything, they won't remember it
      • Animals that received a reward of food after hearing a musical tone showed greater representation of this tone in auditory cortex - tone without reward does not alter topography aud maps
        • There is a neural system that mediates saliency - engaging this is critical for driving experience dependent NP - ACETYLCHOLINE agonists
        • Rats will also repeatedly engage in rehabilitative reaching if it earns them food treats.
    • 8. Age matters: Map reorganisation, synaptogenesis and E.D. Synaptic potentiation all dcrease with age
      • Older people are likely to take longer for neuro pl. changes to occurr
      • Older rats show less NEUROGENESIS (prod of new neurons) after ischaemic insult than young ones.
    • 9. Transference: Plasticity within one set of NEURAL CIRCUITS can transfer to another
      • See Thomson et al. (03) and Kiran's discussion CATE, Complexity Account of Theraputic Efficacy
      • Stimulation of pharynx post stroke enhanced cortical representation and improved swallowing
      • Exercise may also increase this - elevates NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS
    • 10. Interference: N.P Changes resulting from training in some areas can actually interfere with achieving NP changes in other areas
      • Functional compensations vs. bad habits
        • Over-reliance on unaffected modalities
      • 'learned non-use': Training in use of inpsilesional limb (in rats) resulted in decreased use of impaired limb
  3. NEURALPLASTICITY: Adaptive capcity of CNS. Brain can alter structure and function in response to internal & external pressures thorughout life

    • Belived to be basis of learning in intact brain
    • Brain encodes experience and leans new beh.
    • Driven by changes in beh, sensory and cognitive exp
    • RECOVERY: Takes several forms (Brant et al. 97)
      • Restoration
        • Beh level: Perform task in same manner as before
        • Neur level: Restored function within area of cortex previously damaged by stroke.
        • E.g. after thrombolysis
      • Reorganisation
        • Neur level: of neural substrate to lang functions
        • Either ipsilaterally or contralaterally
          • Homologous regions of right hemisphere
          • Dominant hem. lang. areas - especially perilesional
      • Compensation
        • Beh. Level: Use of new strategy to perform a tast
        • Neur. Level: Diff neural tissue takes over function lost
      • Habituation
      • Restiution
  4. RECOVERY / PROGNOSIS - dependent on:

    • Size of lesion
    • Age
    • Gender - women may be more health concous
    • Handedness - lefties perhaps more distributed representation
    • Education level - although correlates w lifestyle
    • SITE of lesion (most important factor)
    • Amount of arcuate fasciculus in R.H. (See Forkel et al. 2014)
    • Single and group case studies have demonstrated improvements in language recovery after many years post-stroke, Hickin et al 2002).
  5. Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy (CATE) (Thompson et al., 2003): The more complex the item that is trained, the more likely it is to be generalised

    • Puts learning hierarcy into debate
      • Complexity hierarchy based on typicality
    • True for: sentence production, naming and child phonology
    • See Kiran (2007)
    • Relates to literature in adult second language learning

Images and files in the map

  • Aphasia 2b - Plasticity
  • Aphasia 2b - Plasticity

Information

Description
Aphasia Mind Map on Aphasia 2b - Plasticity, created by Heather Snaith on 27/12/2016.
Created by
Heather Snaith
Views
3
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?