Mind map
Aphasia 2b - Plasticity

Map content
Aphasia 2b - Plasticity
Raymer et al. (08)
- 1. Timing of treatment delivery
- 2. Use it or lose it
- 3. Generalisation (trans of treat fx)
- 4. Intensity of treatment
Kleim & Jones (08): 10 Principles of Neuroplasticity
- See Isobel's summary sheet...
- 1. Use it or lose it: Neurological functions which aren't utilsed may decline
- Evidence to support the use of language skills to maintain them
- Cortical neurons reduced in vis cortex for kittens deprived of light
- Other sensory modalities may take over
- fMRI revealed blind Pat, visual cortex active in tactile task, e.g. braile
- Tube feeding and neural circuitry in swallowing (Robbins et al 07)
- 2. Use it and improve it: Training in a specific function is likely to improve that function
- N. Plastcitiy is basis of all learning
- Therapy is valid
- See Raymer et al. (07)
- Housing animals in complex environments post injury can improve functional recovery
- Acrobatic training, vs normal exercise in rats (post lesion) shown to enhance synaptic pasticity in contralateral hemishere
- 3. Specificity: Training to drive plasticity in a linguistic area (believed to have regional specificity), needs to be specific to that area - the nature of the experience drives the pasticity
- Don't expect generalisation to always occur! But training in one modality may change a limited subset of neural circuitry involved in another
- Humans trained to make skilled ankle movements vs those trained to repeat unskilled movements exhibited better cortico-spinal excitability
- Rates to CATE / Transference.
- Reach and grab tasks in rats = denritic growth in motor cortex (contra lat to trained limb) but only suble fx on ipsilateral cortex
- 4. Repetition matters: In order for plastic changes to resist decay, training must go beyond the acquisition of skill - repetition beyond where might appear necessary.
- Keep going!
- Rats on skilled reaching task: demo beh changes quickly, however synapse number, strength and map reorganisation does not alter until several days of practise
- 5. Intensity matters: In order for neuroplastic changes to occur training needs to be provided over an intense period. However, too much training can overuse impaired extemities
- Boghal et al (03): Intense training over a short period approx 8 hours / week for 11 weeks was more effective than training over a longer period, approx 2 hrs / wk for 22 weeks
- Get an app!
- Don't overdo it
- Animals trains to perform 400 reaches / day vs 60 / day showed an increase in synapse numbers
- Extreme use during early vulnerable period unwise: Forcing rats to rely on impaired forelimb frst 7 days after smot cort lesion, exaggerated tissue loss & worsened outcomes (compared to rats allowed both limbs)
- 6. Time matters: Different changes occur at diff times during taining
- Therapy should be delivered within particularly sensitive time windows ideally - acute post injury period
- But any therapy is better than no therapy
- However, starting too soon may result in lack of retention
- Motor skill training: Gene expression first, synapse formation, map reorganisation
- Raymer et al (2007) – aphasia treatment initiated in the chronic phase resulted in major functional improvements (from meta-analysis), but the greatest improvements occurred when therapy started in the acute post-injury period.
- Further research needed to know how time windows in rats relate to humans
- Therapy should be delivered within particularly sensitive time windows ideally - acute post injury period
- 7. Salience matters: Emotional stimulus used in training are likely to induce greater N.P. changes
- If it doesn't mean anything, they won't remember it
- Animals that received a reward of food after hearing a musical tone showed greater representation of this tone in auditory cortex - tone without reward does not alter topography aud maps
- There is a neural system that mediates saliency - engaging this is critical for driving experience dependent NP - ACETYLCHOLINE agonists
- Rats will also repeatedly engage in rehabilitative reaching if it earns them food treats.
- 8. Age matters: Map reorganisation, synaptogenesis and E.D. Synaptic potentiation all dcrease with age
- Older people are likely to take longer for neuro pl. changes to occurr
- Older rats show less NEUROGENESIS (prod of new neurons) after ischaemic insult than young ones.
- 9. Transference: Plasticity within one set of NEURAL CIRCUITS can transfer to another
- See Thomson et al. (03) and Kiran's discussion CATE, Complexity Account of Theraputic Efficacy
- Stimulation of pharynx post stroke enhanced cortical representation and improved swallowing
- Exercise may also increase this - elevates NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS
- 10. Interference: N.P Changes resulting from training in some areas can actually interfere with achieving NP changes in other areas
- Functional compensations vs. bad habits
- Over-reliance on unaffected modalities
- 'learned non-use': Training in use of inpsilesional limb (in rats) resulted in decreased use of impaired limb
- Functional compensations vs. bad habits
NEURALPLASTICITY: Adaptive capcity of CNS. Brain can alter structure and function in response to internal & external pressures thorughout life
- Belived to be basis of learning in intact brain
- Brain encodes experience and leans new beh.
- Driven by changes in beh, sensory and cognitive exp
- RECOVERY: Takes several forms (Brant et al. 97)
- Restoration
- Beh level: Perform task in same manner as before
- Neur level: Restored function within area of cortex previously damaged by stroke.
- E.g. after thrombolysis
- Reorganisation
- Neur level: of neural substrate to lang functions
- Either ipsilaterally or contralaterally
- Homologous regions of right hemisphere
- Dominant hem. lang. areas - especially perilesional
- Compensation
- Beh. Level: Use of new strategy to perform a tast
- Neur. Level: Diff neural tissue takes over function lost
- Habituation
- Restiution
- Restoration
RECOVERY / PROGNOSIS - dependent on:
- Size of lesion
- Age
- Gender - women may be more health concous
- Handedness - lefties perhaps more distributed representation
- Education level - although correlates w lifestyle
- SITE of lesion (most important factor)
- Amount of arcuate fasciculus in R.H. (See Forkel et al. 2014)
- Single and group case studies have demonstrated improvements in language recovery after many years post-stroke, Hickin et al 2002).
Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy (CATE) (Thompson et al., 2003): The more complex the item that is trained, the more likely it is to be generalised
- Puts learning hierarcy into debate
- Complexity hierarchy based on typicality
- True for: sentence production, naming and child phonology
- See Kiran (2007)
- Relates to literature in adult second language learning
- Puts learning hierarcy into debate
Images and files in the map
Information
- Description
- Aphasia Mind Map on Aphasia 2b - Plasticity, created by Heather Snaith on 27/12/2016.
- Created by
- Heather Snaith
- Views
- 3
- Rating
