Mind map
Methods in Psychology
Map content
Methods in Psychology
Probability (5% level)
- Type I Error
- If HE is accepted and later turns out not to be true
- More likely if a lenient probability is used e.g. 10% level.
- Type II Error
- If HE is rejected and it later turns out to be true
- More likely if a strict probability is used e.g. 1%
- Type I Error
Parametric and Non-Parametric Tests
- Non-Parametric
- Use nominal + ordinal data, simple, often subjective scales, tests for significance, convert scores to ranks
- sign test, Wilcoxon test, Mann-Whitney, chi-squared + Spearman's Rank Order Correlation test
- Parametric
- Use interval/ratio data, contains info. about size of difference between scores, more powerful test of significance
- Related t-test, independent t-test, Pearson's Product Moment Correlation test
- Non-Parametric
Correlations
- Test for a link/ association between 2 key variables
- Research Hypothesis (instead of HE) used to predict relationship e.g. 'there will be a significant correlation between variable A and variable B'
- Positive Correlation
- Variable A increases as variable B increases
- Negative Correlation
- Variable A increases as variable B decreases
- Zero Correlation
- No pattern/ relationship
- Test for a link/ association between 2 key variables
Directional Hypotheses & Tails of Test
- Non-directional Hypotheses
- There will be a significant difference in the DV when IV is changed
- Used by researchers to reduce experimenter bias (e.g. when rejecting anomalies
- 2-tailed statistical test
- Directional Hypotheses
- Predict a significant increase or significant decrease in DV when IV is changed
- Only used when there is strong previous evidence about the direction of the results
- 1-tailed Statistical test
- Non-directional Hypotheses
Reliability
- External Reliability (test re-test)
- How consistent a method measures over time when repeated (same people under same conditions e.g. IQ test
- Correlate the results of a test conducted on one occaision with the results of a test conducted on a later occaision (with same subjects). High positive correlation = reliable method
- Inter rater/ Observer Reliability
- content analysis/ observational studies
- 1.) Clearly describe behaviour to record (categorise)
- 2.) Observe same ppts. for same amount of time, independently
- 3.) Compare results, if 90% similar = reliable, consistent method
- 2.) Observe same ppts. for same amount of time, independently
- External Reliability (test re-test)
Validity
- To what extent have you measured the factor you set out to measure; whether other factors have affected your results
- e.g. Bigelow set out to measure children's understanding of friendship, but instead may have measured their language ability
- Methods of establishing Validity::
- 1.) Face Validity: look at the method to see if it appears to measure what it is supposed to measure; open to bias
- 2.) Concurrent Validity: give same ppts. the new test, and an established test which measures the same thing (or questionnaire). Test scores for correlation - significant positive = valid
- 3.) Ecological Validity:where the conditions of a test are so controlled that they do not represent how a situation would occur naturally
- 2.) Concurrent Validity: give same ppts. the new test, and an established test which measures the same thing (or questionnaire). Test scores for correlation - significant positive = valid
- 1.) Face Validity: look at the method to see if it appears to measure what it is supposed to measure; open to bias
Sampling
- Target Population = people that your hypothesis relates to and from whom the sample is taken
- Generalise = predict future behaviour of TP on basis of the result of sample
- Q-Sort Cards: used to measure self esteem, select 4 cards, convert into score of mood
- Reliability: test re-test = do test again on same ppts. after two weeks, same results = reliable
- Validity: Compare result's correlation with an established study (questionnaire), significant +ve correlation = valid
- Reliability: test re-test = do test again on same ppts. after two weeks, same results = reliable
- Q-Sort Cards: used to measure self esteem, select 4 cards, convert into score of mood
- Random/ Systematic Sample: everyone in TP has an equal chance of being selected, assigned numbers
- Opportunity Sample: people who are willing and convenient, likely to be unrepresentative
- Stratified Sample: Divided into groups (e.g. gender, nationality, age) then random representative sample from each group
- Opportunity Sample: people who are willing and convenient, likely to be unrepresentative
Ethical Guidelines
- Informed Consent
- Verbal or written consent after information about task is explained, no deception
- Consent for studies involving children
- Consent from parents (if under 16) and child wherever possible
- Right of Withdrawal
- Informed of right to leave study at any time in brief, informed of right to withdraw information in debrief
- Deceiving Participant
- Explained in debrief, consent to be deceived, knowing aim may affect behaviour
- Protection from Physical and Psychological Harm
- Must be aware of consequences of investigation, should feel no worse about themselves after investigation, normalise by informing of other ppts., counselling
- Informed Consent
Hypotheses
- Experimental (HE)
- Null (Ho)
- Alternative (H1)
- Research (HR)
Descriptive Statistics
- Averages
- summarise set of data into 1 value
- Compare 2 sets of scores
- Central point of 2 sets of scores
- Compare 2 sets of scores
- Mean: interval/ratio data
- Median: Ordinal data
- Mode: Nominal data
- summarise set of data into 1 value
- Measures of Dispersal
- How spread out a set of scores are
- Tells yous if your ppts. scores are consistent or variable
- Range: largest - smallest value, affected by extreme scores
- Standard Deviation: uses all scores, use for interval/ ratio data, measures the deviation of each score from the mean
- Averages
Quantitative & Qualitative Methods
- Quantitative
- +Controls extraneous variables, +Establish C&E. +Can test hypothesis, +Can carry out statistical tests
- Qualitative
- +Generates new theories, +High face validity, +High ecological validity, +High level of detail; understand behaviour better
- Quantitative
Information
- Description
- A-Levels Psychology Mind Map on Methods in Psychology, created by HollyBee11 on 07/05/2013.
- Created by
- HollyBee11
- Views
- 106
- Tags
- Rating