Mind map
Parental Investment
Map content
Parental Investment
DEFINITION
- Trivers
- investment from the parent that benefits the offspring, but at some cost to parent's future reproductive sucess
- Examples...
- Intrauterine investment in foetus Abortion / Infanticide Breast-feeding + interval before next birth Nutrition during childhood Education, health care... Marriage costs (dowry, bridewealth)
KIN SELECTION
- = natural selection of an apparently disadvantageous trait that increases in the population due to increased survival of those genetically related to those who possess it.
- explains majority of SOCIAL evolution
- e.g. altruistic behaviour
- Hamilton's Rule
- rb>c
- inclusive fitness
- Haldane: would save 2 brothers or 8 cousins
- explains why...
- parents care for offspring
- members of wider kin group help rear
- parents + offspring sometimes in conflict
PARENT-OFFSPRING CONFLICT
- Offspring concerned with own fitness, not future reproductive sucess of parent -> differences in optimal investment
- mother related to offspring 0.5
- WEANING
- STEP-PARENTS
- Daly & Wilson 1988
- Many more cases of criminal chidl abuse in homes of 1 step-parent and 1 natural parent, than with 2 natural parents. Especially 0-4 yr old range.
- have more interactions involving conflict than do natural parents
- historically, step-mothers (Cinderella)
- Past: high maternal mortality. Investment from mother more - so step-mother effect more significant
- Lawson & Mace 2010 : Father Presence and Child Height
- More height dificit in children with new father figure than in those with no father. Especially in boys.
- Daly & Wilson 1988
- POLYANDRY
- = more than one husband to every female young man baby-sitting child of another man to whose marriage he hopes to add himself
- unrelated father investment -> increased reproductive success with mother
- Yanomamo
- ADOPTION
- Oceania studies: bias toward inclusive fitness strategies
- Adoption nearly always between kin
- Oceania studies: bias toward inclusive fitness strategies
PATERNITY UNCERTAINTY
- RESEMBLANCE
- Platek et.al. 2002,2004
- Are men's desired to invest in children more influenced (than are women's) by resemblance of children to themselves?
- faces of babies blended with own face -> "which one of these babies would you adopt?"
- Men: influenced
- Women: described all babies as sweet
- ANONYMOUS BABY FACE
- Babies equally similar to mother or father - but hard to link with either "Aww, it looks so much like its father!"
- Facial resemblance not so present in new-born
- protection from infanticide
- not outweighed by potential benefit from paternal investment
- Platek et.al. 2002,2004
- PATRILINEAL KIN
- reduced r -> less altruistic to children of mat kin
- Fathers
- Why they devote less effort to child-care than mothers Other reasons: division of labour, alternative oppurtunities open to men
- Grand-parents
- patrilineal grandparents less likely to visit and give presents to grandchildren than matrilineal ones
- Euler et.al. 1995
- Aunts+Uncles
- Gaulin et.al. 1997
- RESEMBLANCE
EVOLUTIONARY COSTS+BENEFITS determined by...
- ABORTION
- Lycett & Dunbar 1999
- Factors influencing parental investment also influence decision to abort pregnancy - a definite reproductive decision
- Influence: female age + marital status
- key variable: liklihood of future marriage
- Single: probability decreases with age Married: increases with age
- also: increases with probability of future marriage
- Lycett & Dunbar 1999
- BENEFITS
- parents relatedness to offspring
- Age of offspring
- Vitality of offspring
- Sex-specific potential for future reproduction
- e.g. opputunities to marry up If poor -> better to have daughter that you can marry up to rich husband. Bridewealth: husband -> bride family. If have a son -> cannot compete, may not get bride
- offspring contribution to family
- COSTS
- Economic/Ecological fluctuation
- Economic opp costs
- future fertility
- Parental age
- Economic constraints
- dowry/bridewealth payments, competition between siblings If poor and in mongomous society with dowry -> expensive to have daughters -> sister competition If have son -> marry one woman. dowry: bride's family -> newly weds
- ABORTION
DIVISION OF LABOUR
- COOPERATION
- Humans: long childhood, multiple dependent offspring whilst still reproducing
- Other coopertaive breeders: younger adults (waiting for mating oppurtunities) help Humans: older females/males help post-reproduction
- Able to maintain unusual life history due to cooperation?
- Other unique characteristics: Rapid reproductive rate Female menopause Low adult mortality BIG BRAIN - these features may be relates (directly or indirectly) to big brain
- In terms of net production: humans only break even around 20 yr old
- Kaplan & Lancaster 2007: data on Ache
- Humans: long childhood, multiple dependent offspring whilst still reproducing
- RAPID REPRODUCTIVE RATE
- major contribution from?
- FATHER
- of Paraguay
- Ache
- DAD OR CAD?
- Male can choose to desert partner in search of new one - costs and benefits. Trade-off of quality (stay) or quantity (desert)
- Monogomy v polygamy
- Hunter-gatherer (no marital wealth): marriages fluid
- Ache: partible paternity beliefs
- Primary and secondary fathers based on probability of paternity. Primary: mostly his. Secondary: partly his.
- Ache: partible paternity beliefs
- Hurtado & Hill 1992
- Ache: -more females to males -higher female fertility -higher mating reward (success if go and find other mate - high if decreased danger of being on own) -higher child survival IF father present (secondary fathers) Dislike of orphans, pre-contact infanticide common
- remarriage in Ache (poly) + Hiwi (mono)
- reward higher for Ache
- ECOLOGICAL VARIATION
- Arctic Inuits
- Women cannot go outside in winter, hunting dangerous -> Men cannot hunt enough to support more than one wife
- Ecologically imposed monogomy
- Women cannot go outside in winter, hunting dangerous -> Men cannot hunt enough to support more than one wife
- Hadza of Tanzania
- Mothers + grandmothers provision (tubers). Men make little difference - hunting season not associated with better nourishment
- males hunting for other reason?
- Mothers + grandmothers provision (tubers). Men make little difference - hunting season not associated with better nourishment
- determines dependency on men
- Arctic Inuits
- Hunter-gatherer (no marital wealth): marriages fluid
- Grandmother: Hadza
- of Tanzania
- FATHER
- major contribution from?
- COOPERATION
MENOPAUSE
- Grandmother Hypothesis
- Better to invest in daughter's offspring than own after certain age - increasing inclusive fitness
- Weight of children in rural Gambia
- Mothers make largest contribution Mat grandmothers also significant Decline in weight when grandmother is still reproducing.
- Mother Hypothesis
- Better to invest in existing children than risk maternal mortality in later births
- Physical Constraint
- Increased risk of maternal mortality with age due to large babies, high reproductive rate + mean high wear+tear Cab't exceed 'chimp' reproductive span / mammalian eggs cannot survive past 50 yrs
- Avoiding Reproductive Competition
- human generations not breeding at same time
- Cant & Jonstone 2008: more likely to happen when there is FEMALE DISPERSAL
- CONFLICT: young woman unrelated to mother-in-law and wins
- MENOPAUSAL SOLUTION: mother-in-law related to young woman's offspring -> best to help and increase inclusive fitness
- Grandmother Hypothesis
SEX-BIASED INVESTMENT: heritable resources
- SEX RATIO
- Everybody has 1 mother 1 father -> reproductive success equal Rarer sex at advantage -> selection pull ratio back to 50:50
- actually parental investment should be equal (not number)
- If one sex more costly + investment equal -> ratios not 50:50 e.g. males more costly -> lower survival rate Ratio evens out once investment stops
- Sex-biased investment to account for asymmetries in costs/reproductive returns
- RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
- If large body size more important in reproductive success to males, mothers in poor conditions should favour daughters -> NET GAIN from smaller daughters higher (than from small sons)
- Effects in womb: Sex ratio at birth by mother's BMI
- Higher %live male births with increasing BMI of mother
- After birth: nutrition, education, medical care, inheritance pattern, infanticide
- INFANTICIDE
- Ache: female infanticide
- Hunting important - males pay back later?
- Arctic Inuits: female infanticide
- male mortality high -> risk of girls not finding husband
- rates of female infanticide increase the more northerly you get
- male mortality high -> risk of girls not finding husband
- Ache: female infanticide
- MARITAL INHERITANCE
- POLYGYNY
- Resource Holding Polygyny (RHP)
- Polygynous marriages usually only exist because males can secure ownership of farmland/herds Women choose who to marry based on resource availability -> rich men get many wives, poor men get non Under RHP women frequently inherited by younger brother if husband dies
- MALE variance in reproductive success
- Resources: greater impact on males
- Male biased wealth transmission
- Bias positively correlated with degree of polygyny
- BRIDEWEALTH
- resource competition for wives
- from grrom's to bride's family
- male-biased
- Daughter cheap - can make profit. Males competing Spend money on son
- males compete
- resource competition for wives
- Resource Holding Polygyny (RHP)
- MONOGAMY
- LITTLE variance in reproductive success
- Resources: husband cannot invest wealth recieved from wife in additional wives
- male wealth not diluted between multiple wives
- DOWRY
- resource competition for exclusive access to wealthiest males' resources between families
- from bride's family to bride/newly wed family
- female-biased
- Females competing. Spend money on getting daughter good marriage
- females compete
- sister cometition
- female infanticide in some Asian countries where dowry is costly
- sister cometition
- resource competition for exclusive access to wealthiest males' resources between families
- POLYGYNY
- SEX RATIO
Information
- Description
- undergraduate Human Behavioural Ecology Mind Map on Parental Investment, created by Janine Brierley on 16/04/2014.
- Created by
- Janine Brierley
- Views
- 31
- Rating