Mind map
Qualitative Methods
Map content
Qualitative Methods
empiricist explanatory studies of norm evolution
interpretative studies, reflecting on social meaning and how the social world is produced
- rejection of scientific inference
NO particular epistemology
Data collection
- interviews *
- focus groups
- internet based research
- archieval/document based research
- monuments/maps/arts
- in any case: TRIANGULATION matters, relying on multiple sources of data
- in order to protect reader from misinformation (e.g. stemming from biased interviews)
- we must be transparent about documents used and NOT used (the scope)
- MAKES VISIBLE inconsistencies (e.g. btw interviews and media reports)
- in order to protect reader from misinformation (e.g. stemming from biased interviews)
- in any case: TRIANGULATION matters, relying on multiple sources of data
- most common
- primary doc (original)
- secondary doc (ref to original)
- treaties
- official reports
- policy statements
- legislation
- media reports
- distinction: international media sources & newspapers
- newspapers: might be ideologically biased
- distinction: international media sources & newspapers
- media reports
- legislation
- policy statements
- official reports
- detailed insight into organization
- however, no unlimited (full & complete) access
- concealing of day to day practices & dec. making process
- no answer to HOW decisions came about
- question rightness of info by consulting local experts
- no answer to HOW decisions came about
- concealing of day to day practices & dec. making process
- however, no unlimited (full & complete) access
- primary doc (original)
- monuments/maps/arts
- NOT peer-reviewed
- content generated by everyone
- powerful blog entries, social network sites
- on the ground, in the country
- e- government
- press-interview transcripts
- official docs
- legislation
- official docs
- press-interview transcripts
- e- government
- on the ground, in the country
- difficulty: factual/ OR individual opinion
- powerful blog entries, social network sites
- content generated by everyone
- archieval/document based research
- form of group interview
- 6-10 part., 8-52 groups
- how ppl perceive info in context of social interaction
- choice
- less intervention
- aim: objective, empiricist research
- more intervention
- aim: interpretative, qualitative research
- less intervention
- choice
- how ppl perceive info in context of social interaction
- 6-10 part., 8-52 groups
- internet based research
- gain factual data - phenomenon
- gain perspective of interview participant
- to learn more about their behavior
- #1 structured interview
- to produce quantitative research data
- participant 'select' responses
- pre-written interview Q and categories of responses
- the script must be followed
- ANY deviation distorts findings
- due to structured appr. = missing out on essential insights
- ANY deviation distorts findings
- the script must be followed
- pre-written interview Q and categories of responses
- participant 'select' responses
- #2 semi structured interview (* most common) = structure + openness
- target elites
- to explain behavior of Intl Org, MNC, NGO
- to explain foreign policy of states/political event
- = position of influence
- cross-referencing (Vglbarkeit)
- script can be extended by researcher's add. Q
- #3 unstructured interviews
- :) unfiltered perspectives of intv. participant
- broad-open ended questions
- complex, unstructured responses
- must be recorded/no note taking
- researcher: no leading function
- must be recorded/no note taking
- complex, unstructured responses
- broad-open ended questions
- COL armed conflict: security daily life 50y.a./now
- :) unfiltered perspectives of intv. participant
- #3 unstructured interviews
- script can be extended by researcher's add. Q
- target elites
- to produce quantitative research data
- gain perspective of interview participant
- focus groups
- interviews *
Data Analysis
- Content analysis = hybrid
- discourse analysis
- =interpretation of linguistic forms of communication
- official + unofficial discourse
- language constructs the world = plays a "performative role"
- => identities formed through intersubjective understanding
- = to understand WHY and HOW particular discourse EMERGES, BECAME DOMINANT, IS USED BY OTHERS
- speeches. documents. declarations
- #1 selection criteria
- speeches. documents. declarations
- = to understand WHY and HOW particular discourse EMERGES, BECAME DOMINANT, IS USED BY OTHERS
- => identities formed through intersubjective understanding
- what do we expect to find in them?
- =on behalf of Organizat/state
- issue = representativeness
- language constructs the world = plays a "performative role"
- Discourse = NO categorization
- = to understand WHY and HOW actors resorted to specific discourse
- Q: Who is identified as {...}
- Q: How does the discourse legitimizde/delegitimize certain course of action?
- Q: How does discourse make possible certain policy choices?
- Q: In which ways does this discourse limit and enable choices/behavior?
- = relationship btw discourse and cognitive psychology
- = relationship btw discourse and power -> how it empowers and disempowers certain groups (Focault)
- = relationship discourse and the context
- the negotiation of agency, responsibility and blame
- the role of hegemonic discourses in shaping the others’ problems and the solutions to them
- the effects of discourses in shaping experiences and views in postcolonial society
- how inferiority is constructed in public texts, including policy, media and cultural texts
- the effects of discourses in shaping experiences and views in postcolonial society
- the role of hegemonic discourses in shaping the others’ problems and the solutions to them
- the negotiation of agency, responsibility and blame
- = relationship discourse and the context
- = relationship btw discourse and power -> how it empowers and disempowers certain groups (Focault)
- What is hidden?
- Q: How does discourse make possible certain policy choices?
- Q: How does the discourse legitimizde/delegitimize certain course of action?
- Q: Who is identified as {...}
- = to understand WHY and HOW actors resorted to specific discourse
- official + unofficial discourse
- =interpretation of linguistic forms of communication
- textual data/photos/TV prog/art into numbers
- #2 categorization
- coding
- finding synonyms representing the concept
- armed conflict = #violence #fear #post-trauma #accountability
- counting of he/she (gender)
- counting we/they (categories)
- aim: identifying specific trends/patterns
- in communication
- finding synonyms representing the concept
- deductive
- creation of categories in advance
- C1 FARC. C2 GOVT C3 COL C4 NGO
- aim: to discern correlations via statistics
- C1 FARC. C2 GOVT C3 COL C4 NGO
- inductive
- identification of categories while reading
- aim: to use data descriptively
- identification of categories while reading
- creation of categories in advance
- coding
- EXP: media coverage of an issue
- #1. selection criteria
- (inter)national coverage
- language
- timeframe
- language
- (inter)national coverage
- #2 categorization
- discourse analysis
- Content analysis = hybrid
Information
- Description
- Mind Map on Qualitative Methods, created by Tere S. on 24/03/2017.
- Created by
- Tere S. · Mar 2017
- Updated
- Mar 24, 2017
- Views
- 0
- Rating