Mapa mental
Right to a Child
Conteúdo do mapa
Right to a Child
Moral Issues
- Is a child a gift?
- Do all men and women have the right to a child?
- Do women of any age have the right to a child?
- Who should pay for IVF?
- Is having a child by artificial methods playing God?
Christian Ethics
- SOL
- important if some of the embryos are used for foetal research or are simply disposed of if unwanted.
- The child is a gift from God
- There are concerns about older women and the development of saviour siblings.
- Some Christians argue that women should have the same rights as men and that age should not be a barrier.
- Other Christians say that they should just accept their infertility as God did not intend them to have children.
- There are concerns about older women and the development of saviour siblings.
- The Sanctity of marriage
- a child should be raised in the context of a heterosexual, permanent relationship between parents.
- This approach prohibits homosexual couples or single women from using sperm donors or surrogates to become parents.
- a child should be raised in the context of a heterosexual, permanent relationship between parents.
- SOL
Natural Law
- Any means other than natural conception would be rejected.
- The idea of masturbation to obtain sperm is wrong.
- Preservation of life and the belief that all life has equal status
- The destruction of embryos goes against these primary precepts.
- Is an absolute theory
- Do not take into consideration the consequences of actions.
Utilitarianism
- Would weigh up the pleasure and pain involved.
- All actions are judged by consequences
- The happiness of the greatest number would consider the cost of the health service and whether money could be better spent in life-saving operations.
- Preference would consider that no-one's happiness is more important than another's so the happiness of the couple is considered.
- Doesn't protect the status of the embryo
- Doesn't see it as sacred in any way.
Kantian Ethics
- The categorical imperative demands that people are treated as ends not means.
- This would apply to the embryo if it is considered to be a person and to others involved, such as a sperm/egg donor and surrogates.
- All humans should have the same moral treatment.
- Danger of treating the creation of human life as just another consumer good.
- Can you universalise IVF to every infertile couple?
- The categorical imperative demands that people are treated as ends not means.
Informações
- Descrição
- Ethics - OCR AS
- Criado por
- Rachel Wallace
- Visualizações
- 34
- Tags
- Avaliação
Mais sobre IVF and the Right to a Child