Mapa mental
Chapter 4 - Theory of monopoly
Conteúdo do mapa
Chapter 4 - Theory of monopoly
Source of monopoly power
- Patent laws
- nationalised industry
- Incumbent has exploited economies of scale
- High sunk costs
- Multiplicity of brands cover all 'gaps in the market'
- Essential raw material controlled
- Brand loyalty
- consumer inertia (do nothing e.g. gas switch)
- imperfect knowledge
- high barriers to entry
Monopoly pricing
- Marginal cost pricing - MC=AR - allocatively efficient
- Average cost pricing - AC=AR - normal pi
Monopoly
- 1:100 concentration ratio
- high barriers to entry
- Natural
- High fixed costs force LRAC to fall continuously
- Better in the hands of one firm
- high MES
- Pure
- The higher the MES, the more likely a Monopoly is
Consumer and producer surplus
- Monopoly converts some consumer surplus to producer surplus
- Dead weight loss
Price Discrimination - Different prices for different consumers for reasons other than costs
- Firms cannot be undercut by other rivals(monopoly)
- Resale is prevented
- At least two different elasticities of demand
- Types
- First degree
- All consumer surplus turned to pi (need to know every consumers preferences perfectly)
- Second degree
- Different blocks of consumption receive different prices - bulk buying discount
- Third degree
- Two markets, elastic D lower price, inelastic D higher price, combined in between
- First degree
- LRAC and MC constant in these markets(is ignored)
- Dimensions of P.D.
- Geographical - car prices higher in UK than Europe mainland
- Time - peak prices
- Age - Child bus tickets cheaper
- Consequences
- price discriminator
- Higher output than operating at single price = economies of scale, which leads to lower prices
- Previous good/service not able to be provided due to loss can now be provided, show with AC and AR curves
- consumer
- Some consumers pay less than others. but some pay more
- first degree = total loss of consumer surplus/welfare
- price discriminator
MARKET FAILURE & EVALUATION
- market failure as there is a dead weight loss, also called allocative inefficiency
- BUT dynamically efficient even though not statically
- Dynamic efficiency in monopoly compared with perfect competition - MC falls so price also falls
- By restricting output gains from economies of scale are lost
- BUT dynamically efficient even though not statically
- consumer faces lack of choice and can be exploited because the firm is a price maker BUT pi can be reinvested to improve quality + lower cost=price
- market failure as there is a dead weight loss, also called allocative inefficiency
how do small firms survive
- niche market
- quality of service
- innovation
- internet
Informações
- Descrição
- econ3
- Criado por
- usman ahmed · jan 2014
- Atualizado
- 13 jan 2017
- Visualizações
- 108
- Tags
- Avaliação