Liability

1. 1Why may someone be liable to compensation to payment?

   1. ALack, quality and quantity of supervision
   2. BImproper explanation of safety and warnings
   3. CImproper medical care
   4. DAll the above
2. 2What liability issues may relate to spectator injuries?

   1. ACrowd Control - Security
   2. BAlcohol Consumption of 3rd Parties
   3. CInjuries from projectiles
   4. DCrowd Control - Security , Alcohol Consumption of 3rd Parties , Injuries from projectiles
3. 3What is premises liability?

   1. ARefers to legal responsibilities you have to those who use your land and facilities
   2. BRefers to licensee and trespasser according to the law
   3. CRefers to when an individual enters a playing area without being given clearance
   4. DThe responsibility to owe an individual a safe environment
4. 4Why do we owe invitees (spectators) the highest duty of care?

   1. AAs we are making money off of them
   2. Bbecause they are fans of the organisation
   3. Cbecause we want them to come back
   4. DProvide a fun and safe environment
5. 5Who is licensee?

   1. AA person who is on the premisses with the consent of the owner but does not bring any economic benefit to the property owner
   2. BA person who is on the premisses without permission
   3. CA person on the property of the premises of the landowner
   4. DThe owner of the the land
6. 6Who is the trespasser?

   1. AA person who is on the premises without permission
   2. BA person on the property with premises of the landowner
   3. CA person trying to steal things
   4. DAn intruder, potentially a murderer
7. 7What duty does the property owner owe to a trespasser?

   1. ATo refrain from intentionally inflicting injury (setting up traps)
   2. BTo refrain from shooting that individual
   3. CTo offer them a place to stay if they so ask
   4. DTo give them the opportunity to explain their actions
8. 8What is negligence?

   1. AConduct that falls below the standard established by the law for protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm
   2. BForgetting to meet health and safety requirements
   3. CA word which is used in order to associate risk with injury
   4. DAn unintentional tort
   5. EConduct that falls below the standard established by the law for protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm. The result of this is an unintentional tort
9. 9When may punitive damages be awarded ?

   1. AGross negligence
   2. BIntended harm or risk
   3. CNegligence cases
   4. DWhen the law recognised the defendant simply failed to act reasonably
10. 10What are the elements of negligence?

    1. ADuty, Breach of Duty, Cause, Harm/Damages
    2. BExecutive Branch, Congressional Branch, Judicial Branch
    3. CDuty, Cause, Breach of Duty and Compensatory Damages
    4. DThe Verve, Oasis, The Police

11. 11What is a duty?

    1. AThe defendant had some obligation, imposed by law, to protect plaintiff from unreasonable risk
    2. Boccurs when one person or company has a duty of care toward another person or company, but fails to live up to that standard.
    3. Cplaintiff must prove that the defendant's actions actually caused the plaintiff's injury
    4. DMonetary compensation that is awarded by a court in a civil action to an individual who has been injured through the wrongful conduct of another party.
12. 12What is a breach of duty?

    1. AMonetary compensation that is awarded by a court in a civil action to an individual who has been injured through the wrongful conduct of another party.
    2. Boccurs when one person or company has a duty of care toward another person or company, but fails to live up to that standard
    3. Ca plaintiff must prove that the defendant's actions actually caused the plaintiff's injury.
    4. DThe defendant had some obligation, imposed by the law, to protect the plaintiff from unreasonable risk. If a party did not have any duty to protect the individual, there will not be a successful negligence claim
13. 13What is cause?

    1. AThe breach of duty must have caused harm to the Plaintiff.
    2. BA breach is a violation of a law or duty. The Defendant must breach his duty in order to be liable for negligence.
    3. CA duty is simply a legal obligation. In order to be sued for Negligence, the Defendant must have owed a duty to the Plaintiff.
    4. DThe Plaintiff must suffer harm in order to sue for negligence. If he suffers no harm, he cannot sue.
14. 14What is harm/damages?

    1. AMonetary compensation that is awarded by a court in a civil action to an individual who has been injured through the wrongful conduct of another party. The Plaintiff must suffer harm in order to sue for negligence. If he suffers no harm, he cannot sue.
    2. BThe breach of duty must have caused harm to the Plaintiff.
    3. CSomeone gets really hurt
    4. DThere has been harmful action taken against one group
15. 15In order for a defendant to get off negligence claims, what must they do?

    1. APay compensatory damages
    2. BPay punitive damages
    3. CProve that 1 element of negligence was filled correctly
    4. DUnder the table favours
16. 16Cause explained:

    1. AWhen an act or failure to act directly produces an event that would have otherwise not have occurred. The is known as proximate causation (cause). Essentially, the defendants actions or failure to act caused harm to the plaintiff
    2. BSome, Harm, loss or damages
    3. CDefendant failed to meet proper standard of care
17. 17What is negligence per se?

    1. AWhen a defendant violated statue. This act caused the kind of harm the state was designed to prevent. The statute provides for criminal penalty
    2. BWhen gross negligence occurred
    3. CWhen the negligence wasn't enough to warrant a court hearing
    4. DWhen contributory negligence has occurred
18. 18What is gross negligence?

    1. AWhen the defendant has fallen so far below the ordinary standard
    2. BWhen they have not provided proper evidence of care
    3. CThey are likely to have done something really bad
    4. DWhen the assumption of risk wasn't properly assumed
19. 19What may a gross negligence change ?

    1. AExpectations - Searches at games
    2. BAttitudes - Individuals change
    3. CLaws - Change in law
    4. DWorry - People become stressed
20. 20What is contributory negligence?

    1. Aboth plaintiff & defendant are negligent (at fault) and the plaintiff is unable to recover any damages (money) from the defendant
    2. Bany negligence by the plaintiff is compared to the degree of negligence by the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff’s damages are reduced to the plaintiff’s fault.
    3. Cthey have fallen so far below the ordinary standard of care that one can expec
    4. Dthe plaintiff understands there is a risk in the particular activity, but still decides to participate
21. 21When may contributory negligence be issued?

    1. Abuilding on fire was not up to code but the plaintiff set the fire in the first place
    2. BStreaker on the field hurt by security
    3. CWhen someone is sued
    4. DWhen an individual has contributed to the negligence
    5. EWhen an individual has contributed to the negligence i.e. building on fire was not up to code but the plaintiff set the fire in the first place
22. 22What is comparative negligence?

    1. Aany negligence by the plaintiff is compared to the degree of negligence by the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff’s damages are reduced to the plaintiff’s fault. The plaintiff will recover something, but that will depend on how negligent they were compared with the defendant
    2. Bboth plaintiff & defendant are negligent (at fault) and the plaintiff is unable to recover any damages (money) from the defendant
23. 23When may someone be charged with Comparative negligence?

    1. AThey have been streaking on a field and where hurt by security on removal
    2. BThey where fishing and fell in a lake
    3. CThey were involved in car crash
    4. DA coach sexually abused an athlete
24. 24What is the one bite of the apple rule?

    1. AYou can't be found negligent if you couldn't see an issue coming
    2. BWhen you get off the hook because it's your first charge
    3. CThe negligence didn't warrant a charge
    4. DAll elements of negligence weren't met
25. 25What is the assumption of risk?

    1. Athe plaintiff understands there is a risk in the particular activity, but still decides to participate. The plaintiff has accepted the risk. However, the plaintiff does not agree to accept risks that are beyond those inherent in the activity
    2. BThey have assumed an environment is safe and risk free
    3. CThey don't understand that they are assuming risk by entering into an environment

Description

Quiz on Liability , created by Jacob Lloyd on 10/02/2018.

Author

Jacob Lloyd

Language

English

Views

0

Tags

m.a.

Rating

No ratings yet

Rate this quiz

Rate this quiz

More on Negligence