What is the main factor of the Induced Compliance Paradigm?
Answer
Participants asked to do something counterattitudinal and are induced to comply with experimenters request
Participants asked to do something proattitudinal and are induced to comply with experimenters request
Participants asked to do something counterattitudinal and are induced to agree with experimenter's views
Participants asked to do something proattitudinal and are induced to agree with experimenter's views
Question 6
Question
What do results of experiments using the Induced Compliance Paradigm usually find?
Answer
Participants asked to perform counterattitudinal behaviour will feel dissonance unless there is strong justification for their actions
Participants asked to perform counterattitudinal behaviour will feel dissonance despite whether there is strong justification for their actions
Participants asked to perform proattitudinal behaviour will feel dissonance unless there is strong justification for their actions
Participants asked to perform proattitudinal behaviour will feel dissonance despite whether there is strong justification for their actions
Question 7
Question
An example of the Induced Compliance Paradigm is Festinger and Mills (1959). (a) What did they do? and (b) what did they find?
Answer
(a) Participants did a boring task and were told to tell other participants it was fun. They were paid nothing, $1 or $20.
(b) Those paid $1 rated the boring task as more enjoyable
(a) Participants did a boring task and were told to tell other participants it was fun. They were paid nothing, $1 or $20.
(b) Those paid $20 rated the boring task as more enjoyable
(a) Participants did a fun task and were told to tell other participants it was fun. They were paid nothing, $1 or $20.
(b) Those paid $1 rated the fun task as less enjoyable
(a) Participants did a fun task and were told to tell other participants it was fun. They were paid nothing, $1 or $20.
(b) Those paid $20 rated the fun task as less enjoyable
Question 8
Question
What is usually the main finding in experiments using the Effort Justification Paradigm?
Answer
Dissonance is experienced when individual makes considerable effort to achieve goal that may not be worthwhile
Dissonance is experienced when an individual does not make effort to achieve a goal that may be worthwhile
Dissonance is experienced when an individual does not make effort to achieve a goal that may not be worthwhile
Dissonance is experienced when individual makes considerable effort to achieve goal that may be worthwhile
Question 9
Question
Arson and Mills (1959) did an experiment using the Effort Justification Paradigm. (a) What did they do? and (b) What did they find?
Answer
(a) Sexual discussion, stage 1 severe, mild or control, stage 2 boring discussion on animal sex
(b) Those in severe condition rated boring discussion as more enjoyable
(a) Sexual discussion, stage 1 severe, mild or control, stage 2 boring discussion on animal sex
(b) Those in severe condition rated boring discussion as less enjoyable
(a) Sexual discussion, stage 1 severe, mild or control, stage 2 interesting discussion on animal sex
(b) Those in severe condition rated interesting discussion as more enjoyable
(a) Sexual discussion, stage 1 severe, mild or control, stage 2 interesting discussion on animal sex
(b) Those in severe condition rated interesting discussion as less enjoyable
Question 10
Question
What is the main finding usually found in experiments using the Free Choice Paradigm?
Answer
After making decision individuals almost always experience dissonance: The chosen option has some negatives and the rejected option some positives. This leads to Post Decisional Spreading of Alternatives - rating chosen higher and rejected lower.
After making decision individuals almost always experience dissonance: The chosen option has some negatives and the rejected option some positives. This leads to Post Decisional Spreading of Alternatives - rating chosen lower and rejected higher.
After making decision individuals almost always experience dissonance: The chosen option has more positives and the rejected more negatives. This leads to Post Decisional Spreading of Alternatives - rating chosen lower and rejected higher.
After making decision individuals almost always experience dissonance: The chosen option has more positives and the rejected more negatives. This leads to Post Decisional Spreading of Alternatives - rating chosen higher and rejected lower.
Question 11
Question
Zanna and Cooper (1974) devised a clever experiment to study role of arousal in dissonance effects. (a) What did they do? and (b) What did they find?
Answer
(a) Gave participants pills that were told to arouse, relax or do nothing. Participants had to write counterattitudinal essay under "high" or "low" choice conditions. Then rated favourablility of essay topic
(b) Arousal pill, attitudes did not change, Relax pill attitude changed under "high" choice.
(a) Gave participants pills that were told to arouse, relax or do nothing. Participants had to write counterattitudinal essay under "high" or "low" choice conditions. Then rated favourablility of essay topic
(b) Arousal pill, attitudes did not change, Relax pill attitude changed under "low" choice.
(a) Gave participants pills that were told to arouse, relax or do nothing. Participants had to write counterattitudinal essay under "high" or "low" choice conditions. Then rated favourablility of essay topic
(b) Arousal pill, attitudes became more favourable, Relax pill attitude changed under "high" choice.
(a) Gave participants pills that were told to arouse, relax or do nothing. Participants had to write counterattitudinal essay under "high" or "low" choice conditions. Then rated favourablility of essay topic
(b) Arousal pill, attitudes became more favourable, Relax pill attitude changed under "low" choice.