Quiz
Exam quiz
Create a free account to finish this quiz
Save your progress and see your final score.
Already have an account? Sign in
Questions in this quiz (10)
1Reminders: Need to be specific (what's written) when describing analogues rather than trying to state something general that encompasses both. The conclusion needs to include the subject and the analogue: this is to this just as this is to this. And subject and analogue need to include every aspect mentioned. Hidden premises must reflect wording in conclusion, such as should, and explicitly state things mentioned in only the premise(s) or conclusion, If I have no good reason to believe that the plausability of explanas is true, then say low. If I have no good reason to believe the explanatory power, then state this, only rate low if something is problematic.
- Aqwertyuiop
- Basdfgh
2Circumstances to generalisation.
- ASlippery slope
- BHasty generalisation
3SIngle instance/situation to generalisation
- ASlippery slope
- BHasty generalisation
4Circumstances to dismissal.
- AGenetic
- BAd hominem
5Person/organisation to dismissal.
- AGenetic
- BAd hominem
6Counter arguments negate _____ when they directly say that they are not true.
- AReasons
- BConclusions
- CInferences
7Counter arguments negate ________ when they negate the conclusion only as a result of the reason given.
- AReasons
- BInferences
8Plausability of explanas..
- A..how likely it is to be true?
- B..if true, could it be the cause?
9Unfalsifiable hypothesis
- ANever etc
- B__
10Confirmation and proof
- AWe sbould expect to see..
- B..
Information
- Description
- Undergraduate Logic & Reasoning Quiz on Exam quiz, created by Imogen Cockayne on 08/06/2017.
- Author
- Imogen Cockayne
- Language
- English
- Views
- 0
- Tags
- Rating
- No ratings yet Rate this quiz