Mindmap
Secondary Storage
Inhalt der Mindmap
Secondary Storage
Magnetic storage
- Compared to Solid state magnetic is very cost effective at £0.02 - Magnetic £0.32 - Solid State
- Contains moving parts so compared to Solid State it is less Durable
Solid State
- Compared to Magnetic Storage, Solid State is more durable because of the less amount of moving parts as a result of this if you was to drop your SSD it would not break
- Yet Solid State is less cost effective compared to Magnetic and optical storage because of how fast the read and write speed is compared to is counter parts because people would like to have a solid state laptop so yes they are going to be pricey
Optical Storage
- Optical is the most easy to transfer software and the most easiest to transport from one person to another yet compared to magnetic storage is harder to transport because of the moving parts and the different aspects of the build
- yet not all things can be perfect because Optical is really easy to scratch therefore making it very fragile but compared to solid state its super fragile
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Year 7 Computing Mindmap am Secondary Storage, erstellt von Rio Walker am 10/12/2019.
- Erstellt von
- Rio Walker
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Verlauf
-
- Erstellt von Rio Walker · 25 Nov 2019
- Kopiert von Rio Walker · 10 Dez 2019
- Bewertung