O GoConqr está de visual novo! Conte para nós o que você achou.

Mapa mental

Secondary Storage

Rio Walker Computing Year 7 Inglês

Conteúdo do mapa

Secondary Storage

  1. Magnetic storage

    • Compared to Solid state magnetic is very cost effective at £0.02 - Magnetic £0.32 - Solid State
    • Contains moving parts so compared to Solid State it is less Durable
  2. Solid State

    • Compared to Magnetic Storage, Solid State is more durable because of the less amount of moving parts as a result of this if you was to drop your SSD it would not break
    • Yet Solid State is less cost effective compared to Magnetic and optical storage because of how fast the read and write speed is compared to is counter parts because people would like to have a solid state laptop so yes they are going to be pricey
  3. Optical Storage

    • Optical is the most easy to transfer software and the most easiest to transport from one person to another yet compared to magnetic storage is harder to transport because of the moving parts and the different aspects of the build
    • yet not all things can be perfect because Optical is really easy to scratch therefore making it very fragile but compared to solid state its super fragile

Informações

Descrição
Year 7 Computing Mapa Mental sobre Secondary Storage, criado por Rio Walker em 10-12-2019.
Criado por
Rio Walker
Visualizações
0
Histórico
  • Criado por Rio Walker · 25 nov 2019
  • Copiado por Rio Walker · 10 dez 2019
Avaliação

Fale Conosco

Sobre o que é sua mensagem?

O que você acha do novo visual?

Você gostou?