Mindmap
Research methods
Inhalt der Mindmap
Research methods
Types of data
- Quantitative
- Data in numerical form
- Qualitative
- Data in descriptive form
- Primary
- Data that the sociologist has collected themself
- Secondary
- Data that already exists and has been collected by someone else
- Quantitative
Factors affecting choice of method
- Practical
- Research opportunity
- Accessibility
- Time and money
- Subject matter
- Personal skills, characteristics and appearance of sociologists
- Requirements of funding body
- Research opportunity
- Ethical
- Informed consent
- Vulnerable groups
- Elderly
- Under the influence of drugs/alcohol
- Disability/mental health issues
- Those with a language barrier
- Right to withdraw
- Confidentiality
- Protection from psychological and physical for both participants and researcher
- Practical
Experiments
- Comparative
- Example
- Durkheim's research into suicide rates in different countries
- Disadvantages
- He hasn't collected his own results so he doesn't know how the researcher did the research so has to rely heavily on the reliability of their tesults
- Type of data
- Secondary
- Quantitative
- Positivists
- Advantages
- No ethical issues
- Example
- Field
- Type of data
- Quantitative
- Primary
- Positivists
- Disadvantages
- Not fully valid because some variables are being manipulated
- Less control over extraneous variables
- Advantages
- Higher validity than Lab experiments
- Example
- Rosenthal and Jacobson- Pygmalion in the classroom
- Type of data
- Lab
- Type of data
- Quantitative
- Positivists
- Primary
- Advantages
- Highly reliable
- Allows us to develop cause and effect relationships
- Highly systematic
- High levels of control
- Examples
- Zimbardo
- Milgram
- Disadvantages
- Artificial setting/little relevance to the real world
- Low validity- Hawthorn effect
- Small scale
- Can have huge ethical issues
- Not representitive
- Cannot control all variables- humans have free will
- Type of data
- Comparative
Questionnaires
- Example
- Sullivan's test of capital
- Sullivan's test of capital
- Advantages
- More representative data
- Highly reliable
- Can cover a large sample over a short period of time
- Little influence from researcher
- Produces solid quantitative data
- Easiest method to use
- Type of data
- Primary
- Quantitative
- Positivists
- Disadvantages
- Response may be low
- answers may be incomplete or illegible
- Data might not be truthful
- Low validity
- Cannot be sure who completed the questionnaire
- Limits possible answers that can be given
- Example
Interviews
- Structured
- Group
- Type of data
- Usually qualitative but depends if it is structured or unstructured
- Usually preferred by interpretivists but if it in quantitative then it is preferred by positivists
- Primary
- Example
- Disadvantages
- Personal bias of interviewer
- Lacks reliablility
- Participants may not give truthful answers
- Don't want to be judged
- Pressure to conform to group
- social desirability
- more confident participants would dominate the group
- Exaggeration of answers
- Advantages
- Can create rapport with participants
- Can follow up responses in depth
- Participants might feel more comfortable in a group situation and open-up more
- More responses at one time
- Less time consuming than interviewing people individually
- Type of data
- Unstructured
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- AS level Sociology Mindmap am Research methods, erstellt von Emma Hutchinson am 23/03/2017.
- Erstellt von
- Emma Hutchinson
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung