Mindmap
Communications
Inhalt der Mindmap
Communications
3 MODELS OF COMMUNICATION
- THE LINEAR MODEL
- THE EARLIEST MODEL
- MOST BASIC MODEL
- SENDER, RECEIVER, MESSAGE, AND STUFF THAT INTERFERES
- BAD BC LEAVES OUT RESPONSE (FEEDBACK)
- EXPLAINS SOME ELEMENTS OF COMMUNICATION BUT DOESN'T DO IT WELL
- THE INTERACTIONAL MODEL
- SENDER AND RECEIVER
- HAS A MESSAGE AND FEEDBACK
- EACH PERSON HAS TO RESPOND OUT OF THEIR FIELD OF EXPERIENCE
- THE TRANSACTIONAL MODEL
- MUST HAVE SHARED MEANING
- FIND WHERE OUR OWN EXPERIENCE OVERLAPS WITH THE EXPERIENCE OF OUR PARTNER
- COMMUNICATION AS SHARED MEANING
- POINT OF AGREEMENT: COMMUNICATION IS SYMBOLIC
- SYMBOLS CARRY MEANING
- THE LINEAR MODEL
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRADITIONS AND CONTEXTS
- TRADITIONS
- SEEK TO HELP US CLASSIFY COMMUNICATION THEORIES
- HISTORICAL IN NATURE
- SEVEN TRADITIONS
- RHETORICAL
- EMPHASIZES SPEECH IN A PUBLIC SETTING
- EXAMINES ABILITY OF MESSAGE OR SPEAKER TO MOVE PEOPLE TO ACTION OR EMOTION
- POLITICAL SPEECHES
- ORGANIZATIONAL
- RELIGIOUS RHETORIC
- VISUAL RHETORIC (HOW SIGNS AND SYMBOLS CREATE EMOTION OR ACTION)
- SEMIOTIC (SIGN)
- FOCUSES ON SIGNS AND SYMBOLS AND MEANING
- THREE AREAS OF FOCUS
- SEMANTICS: "WHAT DOES A SIGN STAND FOR?"
- SYNTACTICS: "WHAT ARE THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN VARIOUS SIGNS"
- PRAGMATICS: THE PRACTICAL USE AND EFFECTS OF SIGNS
- HOW DO WE ACHIEVE COMMON MEANING FOR THESE SIGNS AND SYMBOLS
- CYBERNETIC
- ONE OF MOST COMMON APPROACHES
- EMPHASIZES THE PSYCHOLOGICAL VARIABLES OF INDIVIDUAL EFFECTS, PERSONALITIES, PERCEPTION, AND COGNITION
- HAVING IMPORTANT CONVERSATION - REALIZE YOU NEED TO USE BATHROOM
- HOW WE "PROCESS" MESSAGES
- STUDIES USUALLY INVOLVE SUBJECTS OF PERSUASION OR INFLUENCE
- SOCIO-CULTURAL
- INTERACTIVE NATURE OF HUMANITY
- HOW DO NORMS, ROLES, AND RULES WORK IN COMMUNICATION
- REALITY IS CONSTRUCTED THROUGH A PROCESS OF COMMUNICATING IN GROUPS, SOCIETY, AND CULTURES
- WALK INTO A CLASS AND GOING TO SIT: TAUGHT THAT THOSE DESKS ARE WHERE YOU SIT
- CRITICAL
- WAY COMMUNICATION IS USED TO OPPRESS OR LIBERATE LISTENERS
- COMMUNICATION W/IN RELATIONSHIPS THAT SHAPE IDENTITY/BEHAVIOR AND OPPRESS AN INDIVIDUAL'S WILL
- SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL
- CAUSE AND EFFECT UNDERSTANDING
- IF SPEAKER MENTIONS 9/11 - WHAT WILL THAT DRAW FROM THE AUDIENCE
- COMMUNICATION IS INDIVIDUAL AND INFLUENCED BY VARIABLES
- CAUSE AND EFFECT UNDERSTANDING
- PHENOMENOLOGICAL
- KNOWING THROUGH DIRECT EXPERIENCE
- OUR INTERPRETATION FORMS OUR REALITY
- THE EXPERIENCE OF OTHERNESS/PHENOMENON
- RHETORICAL
- CONTEXTS
- HELP US UNDERSTAND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH COMMUNICATION IS STUDIED
- NUMBER OF PEOPLE
- AVAILABLE CHANNELS
- FOCUS/DISTANCE OF SPEAKERS OR AUDIENCE
- PRACTICAL IN NATURE
- REFLECT WHERE AND WHOM
- HELP US UNDERSTAND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH COMMUNICATION IS STUDIED
- TRADITIONS
THEORY STEW
- WHAT KIND OF STEW DEPENDS ON
- COOK (SCHOLAR)
- EVERY COOK IS DIFFERENT
- KIND OF PHENOMENA THAT WILL CAPTURE THEIR INTEREST
- KINDS OF QUESTIONS THEW WILL ASK ABOUT THE WORLD
- KINDS OF METHODS THEY WILL USE TO INVESTIGATE
- EVERY COOK IS DIFFERENT
- RECIPE
- AXIOLOGY
- WHAT ROLE DO MY VALUES PLAY IN MY THEORY MAKING?
- VALUE-FREE
- MY VALUES HAVE NO ROLE IN RESEARCH
- I MUST SEPARATE MY VALUES FROM MY RESEARCH
- VALUE NEUTRAL
- IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO REALLY KEEP MY VALUES OUT BUT I MUST TRY
- I WILL GET HELP FROM MY FELLOW RESEARCHERS TO MAKE SURE THAT MY RESEARCH IS NOT TAINTED BY MY VALUES AND OPINION
- VALUE-LADEN
- MY VALUES ARE AN IMPORTANT PART OF WHO I AM AND THEY ARE IMPORTANT IN SHAPING MY RESEARCH
- VALUE-FREE
- WHAT ROLE DO MY VALUES PLAY IN MY THEORY MAKING?
- ONTOLOGY
- WHAT IS REAL
- REALIST
- EVEN IF YOU CAN'T SEE IT, IT IS REAL
- WHAT IS REAL IS WHAT I CAN SEE, FEEL, SMELL, AND HEAR
- A TRUTH THAT EXISTS IN THE PHYSICAL WORLD EVEN IF YOU CANNOT PERCEIVE IT
- SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST
- WHEN DID MICHAEL JACKSON DIE
- MJ DIED WHEN YOU HEARD THAT MJ DIED
- WHAT IS REAL IS CREATED THROUGH INTERACTION
- WHEN DID MICHAEL JACKSON DIE
- EPISTEMOLOGY
- HOW DO I KNOW WHAT I KNOW IS REAL
- SUBJECTIVIST
- KNOWLEDGE IS CREATED THROUGH INTERACTION & PARTICIPATION IN RESEARCH
- KNOWLEDGE IS GAINED WHEN I CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING TO AN INDIVIDUAL OR SMALL GROUP
- AS I INTERACT WITH MY PARTICIPANTS, I WILL UNDERSTAND THEIR WORLD
- IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS; WANT TO PARTICIPATE
- AS I INTERACT WITH MY PARTICIPANTS, I WILL UNDERSTAND THEIR WORLD
- OBJECTIVIST
- KNOWLEDGE IS A RESULT OF CAUSES AND EFFECTS
- THE KEYS FELL OFF THE DESK BECAUSE I PUSHED THEM OFF THE DESK
- DO NOT WANT TO INTERACT, WANT TO OBSERVE
- I CAN PREDICT THAT THIS 20 YEAR OLD FEMALE WILL BE LIKE BECAUSE I HAVE OBSERVED OTHER 20 YEAR OLD FEMALES
- KNOWLEDGE IS A RESULT OF CAUSES AND EFFECTS
- GOAL
- WHAT DO I WANT MY THEORY TO DO
- EXPLAIN, PREDICT, AND CONTROL
- I WANT TO KNOW WHY/WHAT CASES COMMUNICATION TO HAPPEN THIS WAY
- IF I KNOW THAT THE CAUSE IS, THEN I CAN PREDICT AND CONTROL HOW THIS TYPE OF COMMUNICATION WILL HAPPEN FOR EVERYBODY
- UNDERSTAND
- I WANT TO UNDERSTAND THE EXPERIENCE AND REALIZE IT MIGHT BE DIFFERENT FOR EVERYBODY AND THAT'S OKAY WITH ME
- EXPLAIN, PREDICT, AND CONTROL
- EMANCIPATE AND TRANSFORM
- I WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHY COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGES SOME AND OPPRESSES OTHERS
- I WANT TO TEAR DOWN THE SYSTEMS THAT THIS TYPE OF COMMUNICATION CREATES AND FREE THOSE IT OPPRESSES
- WHAT DO I WANT MY THEORY TO DO
- AXIOLOGY
- COOK (SCHOLAR)
- DEPENDING ON COMBINATION YOU PUT IN THE STEW, YOU WILL GET ONE OF THE THREE SCHOLARS
- THE EMPIRICIST (POST-POSITIVIST)
- SCHOLARLY, SCIENCE DUDES
- REALIST
- OBJECTIVE
- VALUE-NEUTRAL (FREE)
- INTERPRETIVIST
- HIPPIES; WANT TO EXPERIENCE; SOLELY UNDERSTANDING FOR THEIR OWN BENEFIT
- CONSTRUCTIONISTS
- SUBJECTIVE
- VALUE LADEN
- CRITICAL SCHOLAR
- SCOAIL CONTRUCTIONISTS
- SUBJECTIVE
- VALUE-LADEN : EMANCIPATORS
- WANT TO SET YOU FREE; TRANSFORM; HELP EVERYONE
- "POWER TO THE PEOPLE"
- THE EMPIRICIST (POST-POSITIVIST)
- WHAT KIND OF STEW DEPENDS ON
EMPIRICIST (POST-POSITIVIST)
- LOOKING FOR RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN WHY STUFF HAPPENS AND WHO IT HAPPENS TO
- WE ONLY KNOW THE WORLD THROUGH OBSERVATION
- VIEW OF HELA
- HELA IS CELLS USEFUL FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
- VIEW OF HELA
- WE CAN CONTROL OUR BIASES
INTERPRETIVISTS
- BELIEVE THAT THE GOAL OF THEORY IS TO UNDERSTAND THE PARTICULAR EXPERIENCE OF THE PEOPLE WE RESEARCH
- VIEW OF HELA
- HENRIETTA WAS A BLACK WOMAN WITH A FAMILY AND CANCER
- VIEW OF HELA
- RESEARCH (IMMERSION) COMES FIRST THEN THEORY
- HAVE TO BE IN TOUCH WITH THEIR BIASES
- BELIEVE THAT THE GOAL OF THEORY IS TO UNDERSTAND THE PARTICULAR EXPERIENCE OF THE PEOPLE WE RESEARCH
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Communications, erstellt von milano630 am 22/09/2014.
- Erstellt von
- milano630
- Aufrufe
- 8
- Bewertung