Quiz
Vision and perception key study information
Dieses Quiz enthält Fragetypen, die sich im gewohnten Player öffnen.
Fragen in diesem Quiz (18)
1What was the aim of carmichael's research?
- Ato find out whether words shown with pictures would affect the way the pictures were remembered.
- Bto find out whether context in which an object is seen affects the perception of that object.
- Cto investigate how information changes with each reproduction and why the information changes.
2In Carmichael's research, what were the results for list 1, list 2 and control group?
- AList 1: 69% List 2: 62% and control: 27%
- BList 1: 89% List 2: 45% and control: 75%
- CList 1: 73% List 2: 74% and control: 45%
3In Palmer's research, the percentage of correct responses for appropriate was [blank_start]83[blank_end], the percentage for inappropriate similar was [blank_start]40[blank_end], inappropriate different was [blank_start]49[blank_end] and no context was [blank_start]63[blank_end].
- A83
- B67
- C52
- D56
- E49
- F40
- G37
- H75
- I23
- J49
- K45
- L63
- M78
- N60
- O29
4Complete the procedure for Bartlett's study:
He asked his pps to either take part in a [blank_start]serial reproduction task[blank_end] or a repeated reproduction task.
Pps had to read a story called [blank_start]War Of The Ghosts[blank_end] which was a [blank_start]native american Indian[blank_end] folk tale.
The story was chosen as its [blank_start]ideas and language[blank_end] would be unfamiliar to the participants.
Pps either had to read the story and then recount it to another pp who would recount it to another([blank_start]SRT[blank_end])
Or pps would read the story and then be asked to recall it at a later stage ([blank_start]RRT[blank_end])- AWar Of The Ghosts
- BFight Of The Armies
- CGhost Battle
- DRRT
- ESRT
- FMPL
- GBBI
- HTTY
- IPPS
- JRRT
- KSRT
- Lcharacters
- Mideas and language
- Nauthor
- Ostory
- PNative american Indian
- QEnglish
- RAmerican
- SGerman
- TIndependent groups study
- USerial reproduction task
- VRepeated measures
5Give the 2 weaknesses of Carmichael's study:
-In real life we do not come across such [blank_start]ambiguous stimuli[blank_end] for which we need verbal cues. It is not [blank_start]true to real life[blank_end].
-Carmichael's research was not supported by Prentice showing his findings may not [blank_start]apply widely[blank_end].- AFictional stimuli
- Bambiguous stimuli
- Caccurate shapes
- Dtrue to real life
- Eaccurate
- Freliable
- Gbe accurate
- Hhave been collected properly
- Iapply widely
6Complete the procedure of Carmichael's study:
[blank_start]95[blank_end] pps were used, they were split into 3 groups. Each group was shown 12 pictures.
Group [blank_start]1[blank_end]: shown 12 pictures with descriptions of what each resembled.
Group [blank_start]2[blank_end]: shown 12 pictures with [blank_start]different[blank_end] descriptions of what each resembled.
Group [blank_start]3[blank_end]/control group: Shown 12 pictures but given [blank_start]no[blank_end] descriptions.
Pps were then asked to [blank_start]reproduce[blank_end] the drawings and the researchers observed how much they [blank_start]differed from[blank_end] the original pictures and how similar they were to the words.- A63
- B95
- C29
- D81
- Edifferent
- Fthe same
- G1
- H2
- I3
- J1
- K2
- L3
- M1
- N2
- O3
- Pdiffered from
- Qwere similar to
- Rhad likeness of
- Srecall
- Tremember
- Ureproduce
- Vno
- Wthe same
- Xdifferent
7Choose the 2 strengths of Carmichael's research
- ABy using a control group who did hear either list, we can be sure that the drawings were not simply distorted because the stimulus was ambiguous.
- BBoth SRT and RRT were done many times. This helped to show that the changes in the story followed the same patterns.
- CValid: he controlled variables such as how long each participant saw the context and object for.
- DThe use of 2 lists shows how verbal labels affected the drawings, more than if just one list was used.
- EOther stories were also used and found the same results- this shows that changes weren't unique to WOTG.
8Complete the findings of Bartlett's study:
-Very few of the 20 pps could recall it [blank_start]accurately[blank_end].
-They [blank_start]simplified[blank_end] it, remembering the [blank_start]meaning but inventing the details.[blank_end]
-They added in extra information that was not in the original.
-When asked to recall after several time periods, the recalled version became [blank_start]fixed[blank_end] but there were slight variations on each recall.
-Both SRT and RRT showed [blank_start]the same[blank_end] changes. The [blank_start]SRT[blank_end] showed how one's interpretation affected all others.- Areliably
- Baccurately
- Cwrongly
- Dmeaning but inventing the details.
- Edetails but not the meaning
- Fcharacters but inventing the details
- Gcomplicated
- Hmixed up
- Isimplified
- Jmisremembered
- Kdifferent
- Ldifficult
- Mthe same
- Nfixed
- Osimilar
- Pdifficult to understand
- QRRT
- RPPS
- SSRT
9What is the aim for Palmer's study?
- ATo investigate how information changes with each reproduction and why the information changes.
- BTo find out whether words shown with pictures would affect the way the pictures were remembered.
- CTo find out whether context in which an object is seen affects the perception of that object.
10Complete the procedure for Palmer's study:
-[blank_start]Laboratory[blank_end] experiment
-71 [blank_start]university[blank_end] students who participated as a course requirement, only [blank_start]64[blank_end] actually used in the study.
-Each participant was shown [blank_start]line[blank_end] drawings of many different visual scenes with [blank_start]written[blank_end] instructions telling them what to do.
-The [blank_start]independent[blank_end] variable was the relationship between the scene and the object that the participant had to [blank_start]identify[blank_end].
-the pps were all tested under all 4 conditions:
appropriate: the scene and object matched
[blank_start]inappropriate, similar[blank_end]: the scene and object didn't match but the object was shaped like something that could have been in the scene.
Inappropriate, different: the scene and object didn't match.
[blank_start]No context[blank_end]: No scene, just identifying object.- A56
- B64
- C68
- D60
- ELaboratory
- FField
- GNatural
- Hdetailed
- I3D
- Jcoloured
- Kline
- Lsimple
- Mverbal
- Nwritten
- Oindependent
- Pdependent
- Qcontrolled
- Rinappropriate, different
- Sappropriate, different
- Tinappropriate, similar
- Upre-school
- Vuniversity
- Wcollege
- Xmath
- YNo context
- ZInappropriate
- AAInappropriate, similar
- ABAppropriate, similar
- ACrecall
- ADremember
- AEidentify
- AFread
11What is the aim of Bartlett's study?
- ATo find out whether context in which an object is seen affects the perception of that object.
- BTo investigate how information changes with each reproduction and why the information changes.
- CTo find out whether words shown with pictures would affect the way the pictures were remembered.
12Complete the conclusion to Bartlett's study:
[blank_start]Unfamiliar[blank_end] material changes when it is recalled, becoming [blank_start]shorter, simpler and more stereotyped[blank_end]. This may be due to the effect of [blank_start]schemas[blank_end] on memory.- Aschemas
- Breconstruction
- Cexpectations
- Dperception
- Emore complicated and less accurate
- Fshorter, simpler and more stereotyped
- GMore accurate
- Hfamiliar
- Iunfamiliar
13Complete the conclusion to Palmer's study:
Expectations about the objects based on the scenes [blank_start]affected[blank_end] perception. This happens because the [blank_start]context[blank_end] triggers a [blank_start]perceptual set[blank_end] which leads the person to [blank_start]identify[blank_end] objects that fit the context more easily than ones which don't.- Aaffected
- Bhad no affect on
- Cobject
- Dcontext
- Eexpectation
- Fperceptual set
- Gschema
- Hexpectation
- Iidentify
- Jrecall
14Complete the conclusion to Carmichael's study:
PPs used [blank_start]reconstructive memory[blank_end] to remember the picture. Recalled material is not [blank_start]just a copy[blank_end] of what we see or hear. Information is [blank_start]stored[blank_end] and when it is remembered it is [blank_start]rebuilt[blank_end] so it can be affected by extra information and by ideas(like [blank_start]schemas[blank_end]) we might already have.- Areconstructive memory
- Bschemas
- Cperceptual sets
- Dexpectations
- Ea different version
- Fjust a copy
- Gcollected
- Hforgotten
- Istored
- Jschemas
- Kmemories
- Lperceptions
- Mrebuilt
- Nmisremembered
- Oless accurate than before
15What are 2 weaknesses of Bartlett's study?
- AChose unfamiliar material and could not say whether similar changes would happen with familiar material.
- BSome pps data couldn't be used so there was fewer results meaning data is less reliable.
- CHe did not always test the RRT pps after the same time intervals so changes over time cannot be compared fairly.
- DIn real life we do not come across such ambiguous stimuli for which we need verbal cues. It is not true to real life.
16What are 2 strengths of Palmer's study?
- AOther stories were also used and found the same results, this shows that changes weren't unique to WOTG.
- BValid: he controlled variables such as how long each participant saw the context and object for.
- CEthical: pps were given written instructions so they knew exactly what they were doing.
- DThe use of 2 lists shows how verbal labels affected the drawings more than if just one list was used.
17What are the 2 strengths of Bartlett's study?
- ABoth SRT and RRT were done many times. This helped to show that the changes in the story followed the same patterns.
- BThis research has been supported by other research(Lupyan 2008)
- CValid: he controlled variables such as how long each participant saw the context and object for.
- DOther stories were also used and found the same results, this shows that changes weren't unique to WOTG
18What are 2 weaknesses of Palmer's study?
- ASome pps couldn't be used so there was fewer results meaning data is less reliable.
- BAll the sample was university students in the 1970s so they were likely very similar people and so it means the results would not generalise to a more diverse population.
- CChose unfamiliar material and could not say whether similar changes would happen in familiar material.
- DThe research was not supported by Prentice, showing that his findings may not apply widely.
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- GCSE Psychology Quiz am Vision and perception key study information, erstellt von magicreader1234 am 27/02/2016.
- Autor
- magicreader1234
- Sprache
- English
- Aufrufe
- 2
- Schlagwörter
- Bewertung
- Noch keine Bewertungen Bewerte dieses Quiz