Test
Vision and perception key study information
Este test tiene tipos de pregunta que se abren en el reproductor de siempre.
Preguntas del test (18)
1What was the aim of carmichael's research?
- Ato find out whether words shown with pictures would affect the way the pictures were remembered.
- Bto find out whether context in which an object is seen affects the perception of that object.
- Cto investigate how information changes with each reproduction and why the information changes.
2In Carmichael's research, what were the results for list 1, list 2 and control group?
- AList 1: 69% List 2: 62% and control: 27%
- BList 1: 89% List 2: 45% and control: 75%
- CList 1: 73% List 2: 74% and control: 45%
3In Palmer's research, the percentage of correct responses for appropriate was [blank_start]83[blank_end], the percentage for inappropriate similar was [blank_start]40[blank_end], inappropriate different was [blank_start]49[blank_end] and no context was [blank_start]63[blank_end].
- A83
- B67
- C52
- D56
- E49
- F40
- G37
- H75
- I23
- J49
- K45
- L63
- M78
- N60
- O29
4Complete the procedure for Bartlett's study:
He asked his pps to either take part in a [blank_start]serial reproduction task[blank_end] or a repeated reproduction task.
Pps had to read a story called [blank_start]War Of The Ghosts[blank_end] which was a [blank_start]native american Indian[blank_end] folk tale.
The story was chosen as its [blank_start]ideas and language[blank_end] would be unfamiliar to the participants.
Pps either had to read the story and then recount it to another pp who would recount it to another([blank_start]SRT[blank_end])
Or pps would read the story and then be asked to recall it at a later stage ([blank_start]RRT[blank_end])- AWar Of The Ghosts
- BFight Of The Armies
- CGhost Battle
- DRRT
- ESRT
- FMPL
- GBBI
- HTTY
- IPPS
- JRRT
- KSRT
- Lcharacters
- Mideas and language
- Nauthor
- Ostory
- PNative american Indian
- QEnglish
- RAmerican
- SGerman
- TIndependent groups study
- USerial reproduction task
- VRepeated measures
5Give the 2 weaknesses of Carmichael's study:
-In real life we do not come across such [blank_start]ambiguous stimuli[blank_end] for which we need verbal cues. It is not [blank_start]true to real life[blank_end].
-Carmichael's research was not supported by Prentice showing his findings may not [blank_start]apply widely[blank_end].- AFictional stimuli
- Bambiguous stimuli
- Caccurate shapes
- Dtrue to real life
- Eaccurate
- Freliable
- Gbe accurate
- Hhave been collected properly
- Iapply widely
6Complete the procedure of Carmichael's study:
[blank_start]95[blank_end] pps were used, they were split into 3 groups. Each group was shown 12 pictures.
Group [blank_start]1[blank_end]: shown 12 pictures with descriptions of what each resembled.
Group [blank_start]2[blank_end]: shown 12 pictures with [blank_start]different[blank_end] descriptions of what each resembled.
Group [blank_start]3[blank_end]/control group: Shown 12 pictures but given [blank_start]no[blank_end] descriptions.
Pps were then asked to [blank_start]reproduce[blank_end] the drawings and the researchers observed how much they [blank_start]differed from[blank_end] the original pictures and how similar they were to the words.- A63
- B95
- C29
- D81
- Edifferent
- Fthe same
- G1
- H2
- I3
- J1
- K2
- L3
- M1
- N2
- O3
- Pdiffered from
- Qwere similar to
- Rhad likeness of
- Srecall
- Tremember
- Ureproduce
- Vno
- Wthe same
- Xdifferent
7Choose the 2 strengths of Carmichael's research
- ABy using a control group who did hear either list, we can be sure that the drawings were not simply distorted because the stimulus was ambiguous.
- BBoth SRT and RRT were done many times. This helped to show that the changes in the story followed the same patterns.
- CValid: he controlled variables such as how long each participant saw the context and object for.
- DThe use of 2 lists shows how verbal labels affected the drawings, more than if just one list was used.
- EOther stories were also used and found the same results- this shows that changes weren't unique to WOTG.
8Complete the findings of Bartlett's study:
-Very few of the 20 pps could recall it [blank_start]accurately[blank_end].
-They [blank_start]simplified[blank_end] it, remembering the [blank_start]meaning but inventing the details.[blank_end]
-They added in extra information that was not in the original.
-When asked to recall after several time periods, the recalled version became [blank_start]fixed[blank_end] but there were slight variations on each recall.
-Both SRT and RRT showed [blank_start]the same[blank_end] changes. The [blank_start]SRT[blank_end] showed how one's interpretation affected all others.- Areliably
- Baccurately
- Cwrongly
- Dmeaning but inventing the details.
- Edetails but not the meaning
- Fcharacters but inventing the details
- Gcomplicated
- Hmixed up
- Isimplified
- Jmisremembered
- Kdifferent
- Ldifficult
- Mthe same
- Nfixed
- Osimilar
- Pdifficult to understand
- QRRT
- RPPS
- SSRT
9What is the aim for Palmer's study?
- ATo investigate how information changes with each reproduction and why the information changes.
- BTo find out whether words shown with pictures would affect the way the pictures were remembered.
- CTo find out whether context in which an object is seen affects the perception of that object.
10Complete the procedure for Palmer's study:
-[blank_start]Laboratory[blank_end] experiment
-71 [blank_start]university[blank_end] students who participated as a course requirement, only [blank_start]64[blank_end] actually used in the study.
-Each participant was shown [blank_start]line[blank_end] drawings of many different visual scenes with [blank_start]written[blank_end] instructions telling them what to do.
-The [blank_start]independent[blank_end] variable was the relationship between the scene and the object that the participant had to [blank_start]identify[blank_end].
-the pps were all tested under all 4 conditions:
appropriate: the scene and object matched
[blank_start]inappropriate, similar[blank_end]: the scene and object didn't match but the object was shaped like something that could have been in the scene.
Inappropriate, different: the scene and object didn't match.
[blank_start]No context[blank_end]: No scene, just identifying object.- A56
- B64
- C68
- D60
- ELaboratory
- FField
- GNatural
- Hdetailed
- I3D
- Jcoloured
- Kline
- Lsimple
- Mverbal
- Nwritten
- Oindependent
- Pdependent
- Qcontrolled
- Rinappropriate, different
- Sappropriate, different
- Tinappropriate, similar
- Upre-school
- Vuniversity
- Wcollege
- Xmath
- YNo context
- ZInappropriate
- AAInappropriate, similar
- ABAppropriate, similar
- ACrecall
- ADremember
- AEidentify
- AFread
11What is the aim of Bartlett's study?
- ATo find out whether context in which an object is seen affects the perception of that object.
- BTo investigate how information changes with each reproduction and why the information changes.
- CTo find out whether words shown with pictures would affect the way the pictures were remembered.
12Complete the conclusion to Bartlett's study:
[blank_start]Unfamiliar[blank_end] material changes when it is recalled, becoming [blank_start]shorter, simpler and more stereotyped[blank_end]. This may be due to the effect of [blank_start]schemas[blank_end] on memory.- Aschemas
- Breconstruction
- Cexpectations
- Dperception
- Emore complicated and less accurate
- Fshorter, simpler and more stereotyped
- GMore accurate
- Hfamiliar
- Iunfamiliar
13Complete the conclusion to Palmer's study:
Expectations about the objects based on the scenes [blank_start]affected[blank_end] perception. This happens because the [blank_start]context[blank_end] triggers a [blank_start]perceptual set[blank_end] which leads the person to [blank_start]identify[blank_end] objects that fit the context more easily than ones which don't.- Aaffected
- Bhad no affect on
- Cobject
- Dcontext
- Eexpectation
- Fperceptual set
- Gschema
- Hexpectation
- Iidentify
- Jrecall
14Complete the conclusion to Carmichael's study:
PPs used [blank_start]reconstructive memory[blank_end] to remember the picture. Recalled material is not [blank_start]just a copy[blank_end] of what we see or hear. Information is [blank_start]stored[blank_end] and when it is remembered it is [blank_start]rebuilt[blank_end] so it can be affected by extra information and by ideas(like [blank_start]schemas[blank_end]) we might already have.- Areconstructive memory
- Bschemas
- Cperceptual sets
- Dexpectations
- Ea different version
- Fjust a copy
- Gcollected
- Hforgotten
- Istored
- Jschemas
- Kmemories
- Lperceptions
- Mrebuilt
- Nmisremembered
- Oless accurate than before
15What are 2 weaknesses of Bartlett's study?
- AChose unfamiliar material and could not say whether similar changes would happen with familiar material.
- BSome pps data couldn't be used so there was fewer results meaning data is less reliable.
- CHe did not always test the RRT pps after the same time intervals so changes over time cannot be compared fairly.
- DIn real life we do not come across such ambiguous stimuli for which we need verbal cues. It is not true to real life.
16What are 2 strengths of Palmer's study?
- AOther stories were also used and found the same results, this shows that changes weren't unique to WOTG.
- BValid: he controlled variables such as how long each participant saw the context and object for.
- CEthical: pps were given written instructions so they knew exactly what they were doing.
- DThe use of 2 lists shows how verbal labels affected the drawings more than if just one list was used.
17What are the 2 strengths of Bartlett's study?
- ABoth SRT and RRT were done many times. This helped to show that the changes in the story followed the same patterns.
- BThis research has been supported by other research(Lupyan 2008)
- CValid: he controlled variables such as how long each participant saw the context and object for.
- DOther stories were also used and found the same results, this shows that changes weren't unique to WOTG
18What are 2 weaknesses of Palmer's study?
- ASome pps couldn't be used so there was fewer results meaning data is less reliable.
- BAll the sample was university students in the 1970s so they were likely very similar people and so it means the results would not generalise to a more diverse population.
- CChose unfamiliar material and could not say whether similar changes would happen in familiar material.
- DThe research was not supported by Prentice, showing that his findings may not apply widely.
Información
- Descripción
- GCSE Psychology Test sobre Vision and perception key study information, creado por magicreader1234 el 27/02/2016.
- Autor
- magicreader1234
- Idioma
- English
- Visitas
- 2
- Etiquetas
- Valoración
- Aún sin valoraciones Valora este test