Mind map
Implications of Tariffs
Map content
Implications of Tariffs
Introduction
- Total Cost of Ownership
- The belief that when purchasing an asset, you should not just look at short term cost
- House example
- Applying the TCO view of costs to the cost imposed by tariffs
- Focusing on hidden costs, not just the potential increase in prices
- Previous US-China trade
- Trade Deficit
- % US Products made in China
- Us imported $560bn worth of goods in 2018
- Accounted for 21% of the value of all goods imported to the US
- How tariffs came about
- For the sake of time, I will be mainly looking at this question from the POV of Americans
- Total Cost of Ownership
Direct Costs
- Price increases for consumers seen as direct cost. Is this always the case?
- Tariffs' effect on prices is twofold; one raises prices, one lowers them. Depends which effect is stronger
- As tariffs cause a large fall in demand for Chinese products, and since the US is such a large importer of Chinese goods, the demand for these goods will fall, thus lowering their price
- Represented by the equation: American Price = Chinese Price (1-t)
- Effect on prices depends on if the tariff is higher or lower than the fall in Chinese prices
- Chinese tariffs imposed last year were not found to be inflationary by the federal reserve
- Study estimated costs for a family of four to rise by $767 (The Trade Partnership)
- That is to say that there is no cost imposed
- Tariffs' effect on prices is twofold; one raises prices, one lowers them. Depends which effect is stronger
- Price increases for consumers seen as direct cost. Is this always the case?
Cost of Switching Suppliers
- Survey found that 40% of American companies with suppliers in China plan actively look elsewhere (AmCham)
- Imports from Vietnam jumped 21 per cent
- Realigning the supply network might mitigate the effect of tariffs but other tradeoffs must be considered
- Cost
- Labour
- Quality
- Service levels
- Cycle time
- At first firms were reluctant to abandon long-standing relationships of possible short term trade dispute
- Now many re-evaluating decisions
- Switching Costs
- Deadweight Losses
- Accumulate when firms switch to cheaper but less efficient producers to reduce their exposure to tariffed goods
- Time and effort sourcing, and evaluating the viability of new suppliers/regions
- Deadweight Losses
- Lost benefits of close buyer-supplier relationship
- Service and support
- Quality
- Survey found that 40% of American companies with suppliers in China plan actively look elsewhere (AmCham)
Hidden Finance Costs
- Increase in cost of capital due to financial stress
- Weak investment spending is further hurting trade because machinery, equipment and other capital goods are often imported
- Uncertainty is the enemy of investment
- Wait and see approach
- Uncertainty to cause $585bn loss to global economy
- Businesses unsure when trade war will end so reluctant to make large investments
Effect on Contracts/Design Costs
- Example: ControlTek (NY Times)
- ControlTek is rewriting contract language to make it easier to pass the cost of tariffs on to its customers
- Changing the way in which US-China contracts are written
- US farmers and the Chinese buyers previously had special relationship
- When Chinese buyers draw up new contracts in the future, they may factor the possibility of another trade war into the transaction cost
- Doesn't just affect Goods
- High-tech engineering adding value and contributing to the price of end products
- Engineering and design takes place across borders, giving new meaning to tariffs and increases design costs
- ControlTek are shifting supply chains out of China where possible, and redesigning products to avoid Chinese components where it isn’t.
- High-tech engineering adding value and contributing to the price of end products
- Example: ControlTek (NY Times)
Conclusion: Was it Worth It?
- Tariffs have not yet compelled businesses to return large-scale production to US
- Labour and other costs tend to be too high to compete
- Federal Reserve report found that US firms were actually worse off because of retaliatory tariffs and an increase in the cost of Chinese components
- Administration did not get the structural changes to China’s economy
- Example: Huge subsidies to Chinese companies
- TBD whether or not China will stick to agreement, and only for two years
- Marc Busch: “It’s more a cessation of hostilities, phase one, coupled with some barter.”
- Unsurprisingly Trump selling the deal as a massive win
- Termed "Phase One" to help Trump in 2020 election
- Hard to say whether it was worth it given the difficulty in calculating the effect of the hidden costs
- IMF economists calculated the direct costs imposed by the tariffs to reduce US GDP by .2%
- But calculated the cost of indirect effects (weaker business confidence, productivity etc.) .4% of GDP
- Trade deficit closed by $43bn
- Tariffs have not yet compelled businesses to return large-scale production to US
Phase one Deal
- China agreed to buy $200bn of US products over 2 year period
- Concessions on IP, currency and access to financial services
- US will call off and reduce some tariffs
- Though taxes on $350bn Chinese goods will remain
- December 2019
Why Trump Imposed Tariffs
- Unofficial Reasons
- Stroke ego
- Draw away attention from impeachment proceedings
- Improve public image before election
- Reduce trade deficit ($420bn in 2018)
- Revive US manufacturing
- Upset with special subsidies given to Chinese firms by Beijing
- Nio, Tesla competitor
- The stealing of US IP by China
- Currency manipulation
- Unofficial Reasons
Information
- Description
- Mind Map on Implications of Tariffs, created by Stephen Barry on 21/01/2020.
- Created by
- Stephen Barry
- Views
- 1
- Rating