Notes
Implementation & Evaluation
Content of the notes (8)
Page 1
Implementation Phase
Doing, delegating and documenting
Delegation and Supervision
Transferring responsibility while retaining accountability
Includes supervision
YOU CANNOT DELEGATE:
Any intervention that requires independent, specialized nursing knowledge, skill or judgement
Should not be doing anything independently
Requires your supervision
Page 2
Five Rights of Delegation
Right task
Examples of tasks you might assign to a NAP are bathing a stable patient, ambulating steady patients, obtaining routine vital signs, changing linens, assisting patients with meals, clerical duties, and transporting non-acute patients and specimens.
Right circumstance
Before deciding to delegate, assess your patient to be certain that her needs match the abilities of the NAP or LPN.
Right person (patient and assistant)
You must also be sure that the LPN or NAP is competent to perform the task and that his workload allows time to do the task properly. Consider the person’s experience, training, and cultural competence.
Right direction/communication = Make sure the other person understands and everything is coherent
(1) Explain exactly what the task is
(2) Include specific times and methods for reporting
(3) Explain the purpose or objective of the task
(4) Describe the expected results or
potential complications
(5) Be specific in your instructions
Right supervision
Supervision is the process of directing, guiding, and influencing the performance of the delegated task.
When you delegate tasks to a NAP or LVN/LPN, you or another RN must be available to answer questions and provide help, if necessary. You are responsible for providing supervision and evaluating the outcomes.
Page 3
Documentation
Important because if anything happens you need to report it
The final step of implementation
Records the nursing activities and the client's response = Includes what you did and the client's response
Should be able to look at the document and know everything about the patient
Documentation is a mode of communication among the members of the health team, and it provides the information you need to evaluate the patient’s health status and the nursing care plan.
Evaluation - Did it work or did it not work
The final step of the nursing process
Evaluation:
Client's progress toward goals
Effectiveness of nursing care plan
Quality of care in the healthcare setting
Page 4
Standards and Criteria in Evaluation
ANA standards include a set of criteria to help describe the standard
Represent expected or accepted levels of performance
Provide a model for what ought to be done
Used to describe quality nursing care
Criteria: Measurable characteristics, properties, attributes or qualities that describe the specific skills, knowledge, behaviors and attitudes that are desired or expected
Reliable = consistent results that yield the same results every time
Valid = if it is really measuring what it was intended to measure
What is being Evaluated?
Structure
Focuses on the setting in which care is provided
Explores the effect of organizational characteristics on the quality of care
Requires standards and data about policies, procedures, resources, facilities, equipment, and number and qualifications of personnel
Process
Focuses on the manner in which care is given
The activities performed by nurses
Explores whether the care was relevant to patient needs, appropriate, complete and timely
Outcomes
Focuses on observable/measurable changes in the client's health stays that result from the care given
Frequency and Time of Evaluations
Ongoing
Done while implementing
Immediately after an intervention
At each Patient contact
Intermittent
Performed at specified times
Terminal
Describes the client's health status and progress toward goals at the time of discharge
Page 5
Evaluating Client Progress
Review outcomes: review the goals/outcomes on the patient’s care plan.
The goals and indicators you identified in the planning outcomes phase suggest the kind of assessments you need to make and provide criteria by which to judge the data.
Collect reassessment data:
reassessments are always focused assessments and the care plan goals determine their focus.
Judge goal achievement:
Compare the reassessment data with the patient’s goals and ask are the responses (actual outcomes) the same as the expected or desired outcomes. If yes, the goal has been met. When some but not all of the desired behaviors are observed , or the desired response occurs only some of the time it is considered partial achievement. When the desired response did not occur the goal is labeled not achieved.
Record the evaluative statement
: It should include the conclusion about whether the goal was achieved and the reassessment data to support the judgment.
Evaluate collaborative problems:
compare the reassessment data to established norms and determine whether data are within an acceptable range.
Page 6
Evaluating and Revising the Care Plan
Relate outcome to interventions
Draw conclusions about problem status
Revise the Care Plan
Checklist for Evaluating the Care Plan
Review Assessment
The data may have change (change in client condition or new data may have been identified)
Review diagnosis
May need to revise or add new nursing diagnoses
Other diagnosis may not be clear or validated
Review planning outcomes
Will need to revise outcomes if data was revised
Outcomes could be unrealistic or broad
Change in client priorities
Review planning interventions
If you determine interventions were not effective
If you revised the diagnosis or outcomes
Review implementations
Goals were not met because of a failure to implement the nursing orders or the manner they were implemented
Get input from the client, significant others, caregivers and the client records
Page 7
Thinking about your Thinking
Inquiring
Is my evaluation statement clearly stated ? Were my information sources reliable? Did I jump to conclusions about goal achievement? Do I need any other data to validate my conclusion?
Noticing content
What was going on either before or during evaluation that might have influenced my ability to gather data or draw conclusions?What emotional responses influenced my conclusions about goal achievement?
Analyzing assumptions
What biases do I have that may have affected my ability to reassess or evaluate goal achievement?
Reflecting skeptically
Did I make evaluating a priority? Did I schedule time for it, the same as I do for interventions? Could I have done it better? What would I do differently next time?
Page 8
Common Errors of Evaluation
Failing to evaluate systematically
Failing to record results - Failure to document
Failing to use reassessment data to reexamine and modify the care plan
Evaluating Quality of Care in a Healthcare Setting
Quality assurance (QA) goal
To evaluate and improve care provided in the healthcare setting
QA involves evaluation of
Structures, outcomes, and processes.
QU makes sure that the client is getting the best care possible and makes sure caregivers are following standards of practice
Information
- Description
- Note on Implementation & Evaluation, created by Kes Samarita on 11/02/2018.
- Created by
- Kes Samarita
- Views
- 3
- Rating