Logical Fallacies

Start with an overview

The Logical Fallacies mind map introduces statements that can sound reasonable but be deceptive. It includes hasty or sweeping generalization, where a conclusion is reached on a limited basis. Start here to see a fallacy in the context of the map.

Next, open the Logical Fallacies flashcard deck. It covers hasty generalization alongside faulty causality, either/or reasoning, slippery slope, bandwagon, ad hominem and straw man. Use the cards to practice recognizing the names and descriptions after you have looked at the overview.

Practice with the quiz and maps

Concept 7 Practice Quiz includes a question about an ad hominem argument: attacking a person instead of discussing their ideas. Try it after studying the cards, then return to the map or deck to look again at any terms you want to review.

The Debate mind map also includes logical fallacies, including bandwagon appeal, straw man and hasty generalization. Compare the terms it lists with those in the Logical Fallacies resources. This gives you another way to navigate the material rather than relying on a single format.

Explore arguments and reasoning

The Fallacies flashcard deck adds terms such as non sequitur, stereotyping, card stacking and circular argument. Fallacies of Reasoning includes critical listening and parts of an argument, such as claim, warrant, backing and rebuttal. These decks offer different starting points for studying the language used in arguments.

For more context, the Arguments in Action notes cover fallacies and argument evaluation. They also discuss statements and their truth value. Use the notes alongside a deck when you want to move between a longer explanation and individual terms.

Connect to the unit

Logical Fallacies is a section of Argumentation and Rhetoric in Philosophy. The resources connect fallacy terms with ideas such as premises, conclusions and argument evaluation. Choose a mind map and a flashcard deck to study them together.