Fichas
Studies in Classical Conditioning
Fichas del conjunto (5)
- 1Main one:Pavlov 1902
- 2What did Barnet et al 1997 look at?Contiguity - how close together in time the CS and UCS are by forward and backwards conditioning rats with light = shock and then pairing light and bell sound. Lick suppression.
- 3What did Riscorla 1968 look at?Contingency - the predictive nature of the CS and US. In group A, electric shock always paired with a tone. In group B, not every shock was paired with a tone. Group A associated the tone with shocks much faster.
- 4What did Domjan and Wilson 1972 look at?The appropriateness of the pairing. Two groups of mice - one where taste was associated with illness and one where noise was associated with it. Group taste: sweet water paired with making them ill. They avoid sweet water. Sound group: if they drank from water that made a loud sound trigger, it made them sick, but they didn't learn
- 5Domjan and Wilson 1972 cont.However, if the 'loud' water was paired with an electric shock, they began to learn not to drink from the bowl of water that made a loud sound.
Illness in this experiment brought about by lithium chloride in water
Información
- Descripción
- - Animal Biology Fichas sobre Studies in Classical Conditioning , creado por Emma Lloyd el 11/05/2019.
- Creado por
- Emma Lloyd · may 2019
- Actualizado
- 11 may 2019
- Visitas
- 1
- Valoración