Flashcards
Participant Observation
Cards in this deck (69)
- 1Participant ObserverWhen researcher becomes part of the participant group
- 2Contrived ObservationArranging a setting to specifically facilitate a particular behaviour
- 3Naturalistic ObservationObserves in a natural setting as inconspicuous as possible
- 4Controlling for Participant InfluenceMust ensure behaviours are not influenced by researcher
- 5Controlling for Subjective InterpretationsMust ensure behaviours are judged in a consistent way such as precategorizong behaviours
- 6Quantifying Observations: Duration MethodHow much time spent on a specific behaviour
- 7Quantifying Observations: Frequency MethodHow many times the behaviour happens
- 8Quantifying Observations: Interval MethodDivide obsv. period into intervals and record whatever behaviour happens in each interval
- 9Questions: Open EndedAllows participants full freedom in response
- 10Questions: RestrictiveRestricts response by giving a limited number of alternatives
- 11Questions: Rating ScalesRespondents choose numerical value on a predetermined scale
- 12Selecting Participants: Idiographic ApproachIntensive examination of a single person by observation, interview, self report
- 13Selecting Participants: Clinical psychologyExamine outcome of individual patient through history current behaviour and changes in behaviour
- 14Case Study: Rare & Unusual CasesRare forms of psychopathology make it impossible to gather a group
- 15Case Study: CounterexamplesDetailed description of the individual to show an exception to a rule
- 16Case Study: DisadvantagesSelection bias, no generalizability, subjective
- 17Correlational StrategyTo study the relationship between two or more variables
- 18Limits of Correlational: Directionality ProblemAssuming causation
- 19Limits of Correlations: Third Variable ProblemWhen two variables tend to be related to each other but there is another unknown variable that is the real source
- 20Predictor VariableX Variable, thought to explain variation in other variable. Like the IV
- 21Outcome/Criterion VariableY Variable: explained by predictor variable, like the DV
- 22Method of TenacityHolding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or as superstition
- 23Method of IntuitionBelieving something bc it feels right
- 24Method of AuthorityRelying on info from an expert in subject area
- 25Method of FaithUnquestioning trust in authority figure
- 26Empirical MethodUse direct sensory info to obtain knowledge
- 27The Scientific MethodFormulating specific questions and systematically finding answers
- 28The Scientific MethodObservation, hypothesis, logical prediction, empirically tested with systematic observations, new hypothesis, cycle continues
- 29Theory ConditionsParsimonious(explains a lot with few concept)
Precise
Testable - 30Hypothesis ConditionsLogical
Testable
Refutable
Positive - 31Applied ResearchSolve a particular problem
- 32Basic ResearchUnderstand a particular phenomena
- 33Why Do We Take Measurements?Comparison
Classification
Prediction
Program Evaluation
Diagnosis
Decision-Making - 34ConstructsPresumed unobservable internal mechanisms that account for externally observed
- 35Construct ValidityWhen a measurement of variable behaves same way as variable itself
- 36Concurrent ValidityExtent which a measure relates to other existing measures of same construct
- 37Predictive ValidityWhen measurement of construct accurately predicts behaviour
- 38Convergent ValidityCreating two different methods to measure the same construct and showing they have related scores showing they join on the same construct
- 39Divergent/Discriminant ValidityMeasuring both constructs and showing that there is little or no relationship between the two measurements
- 40Face ValidityDoes it look valid?
- 41Internal ValidityHow closely experimental design follows cause and effect
- 42External ValidityExtent to which results can be generalized to population
- 43Reliability ErrorsObserver error
Environ. changes
Participant Changes - 44Test-Retest ReliabilityComparing scores from two Successive measurements
- 45Measurement Error Comes From...The participant
The instrumentation
The testing environment
Experimenter bias - 46Acting ethically requires...Balance the value of advancing knowledge against the value of noninterference in the lives of others
- 47Numerberg CodeA result of atrocious nazi experiments, foundation of ethical guidelines used today for research
- 48Belmont ReportRespect of Persons: consent
Beneficence: minimize risk, max benefits
Justice: fairness in procedures for selecting participants - 49Tri-Council StatementRespect for persons
Concern for welfare
Justice - 50CPA 2000Respect for Dignity
Responsible caring
Integrity in Relationships
Responsibility to society - 51Overlap with NurembergNo harm, deception, competence, informed consent
- 52Animal Research APAProper care, abide by laws, handlers must be properly trained, minimize pain discomfort, justified by scientific value
- 53Proportionate Stratified SamplingDeliberately sampling to ensure prop. Of subgroup in sample is same as in population
- 54Multistage SamplingRandom Sampling at several stages: uni/department/professor
- 55Cluster SamplingRandomly select groups instead of individuals
- 56Probability SamplingNeed all population
Selection unbiased and random
Exact size of population known - 57NonProbability SamplingPopulation size is unknown. Selection is biased, odds are unknown
- 58Stratified SamplingDividing a population into subgroups and selecting a random sample from each stratum
- 59Convenience SamplingSelect on basis of accessibility and convenience
- 60Purposive SamplingSelecting based on characteristics relevant to research question
- 61Quota SamplingIdentified relevant categories of people
- 62Snowball MethodAsking ppl to recommend others they know
- 63Multiple Treatment InterfaceCarry over effects from first treatment
- 64Novelty EffectNew situation elicits artificial responses
- 65Pretest measures canDesensitize patient
- 66Confounding VariablesAny additional variable in a study not being measured but changes systematically along with the variables being measured
- 67Environmental VariableAny characteristic in the physical environment that differs between treatment conditions
- 68IndividuAl differencesCharacteristics of individuals that differ from person to person
- 69Threats to internal Validity:Any factor of the study that allows for an alternative explanation of results
Information
- Description
- When researcher becomes part of the participant group
- Created by
- Arijeta Nikocevic · Feb 2017
- Updated
- Feb 28, 2017
- Views
- 13
- Rating