GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Flashcards

Law Unit 2

Kennedy Lee Law A level English 100 cards

Cards in this deck (100)

  1. 1What is the general rule of omissions?Can't be guilty for a failure to act - Stephens Digest on Criminal Law
  2. 2What are the exceptions to the general rule of omissions?Contractual duty to act - Pittwood
    Duty due to relationship - Gibbins and Proctor
    Duty voluntarily - Stone and Dobinson
    Duty due to official position - Dytham
    Duty arises when D set in motion a chain of events - Miller
  3. 3What is the legal rule and case for factual causation?But for test from R v White
  4. 4What is the legal rule and case for legal causation?Operating and substantial cause test from R v Smith
  5. 5What is the meaning of the thin skull rule, and what cases demonstrate this?Take your victim and you find him, R v Blaue, R v Hayward
  6. 6Novus actus with examplesVictims own actions - "daft and unreasonable" - R v Roberts, R v Williams
    Act of 3rd party - Jordan, Smith, Cheshire
    Natural but unpredictable event
  7. 73 types of mens rea with test and exampleDirect - Mohan - decision to bring about a prohibited consequence
    Indirect - R v Woollin - virtual certainty test
    Recklessness - Cunningham - realising the risk but taking it anyway
  8. 8What is transferred malice?when someone intended to commit an offence against one person but instead committed a similar offence against someone else - Latimer / Pembilton
  9. 9what is a strict liability offence?Where the defendant is guilty only for committing the actus reus, no mens rea is required - Larsonneur, Harrow London Borough Council v Shah
  10. 10why should we have strict liability offences?Helps protect society - public safety - R v Blake
    Encourages higher standards - hygiene - Alphacell v Woodward
  11. 11Whats wrong with strict liability offences?Makes people guilty when not blameworthy - Harrow London Borough Council v Shah
  12. 12what is absolute liability?The actus reus was commited involuntarily - no need for mens rea
  13. 13Whats the coincidence rule?in order for defendant to be guilty of an offence, the actus reus and mens rea must happen at the same time - Fagan v Metropolitan Police
  14. 14Where can the actus reus and mens rea happen at different times?When the actus reus is made a continuing act - Thabo Meli / Church
  15. 15Definition of assaultIntentionally or recklessly causing the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence - Fagan
  16. 16A/R of assault (5 points)Emphasis on what victim thought would happen - Logdon
    Actions alone - Smith v Woking Police
    Words alone - Burstow
    Words can negate - Tuberville v Savage
    Immediate = no instantaneous - Smith v Woking Police
  17. 17M/R of assaultIntentionally/recklessly causing V to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence - Savage
  18. 18Definition of batteryIntentionally or recklessly applying unlawful force on another - Ireland;Burstow
  19. 19A/R for battery (3 points)Smallest of touches - Collins v Wilcock
    Touching clothes is sufficient - Thomas
    Indirect battery - DPP v K / Haystead
  20. 20M/R for batteryIntentionally/recklessly appling unlawful force on another - Venna
  21. 21S47 definitionAssault or battery occasioning ABH - S47 OAPA 1861
  22. 22A/R for s47Assault or battery
    Occasioning = causing
  23. 23A/R for ABHABH - any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim - Miller
    Includes momentarily loss of consciousness - T v DPP
    Psychiatric harm is sufficient - Chan-Fook
  24. 24M/R for S47No addtional mens rea - Savage;Parmenter
    (only mens rea of assault/battery)
  25. 25Definition of S20Wounding or causing GBH - S20 OAPA 1861
  26. 26A/R for S20Wound - cut or break in continuity of skin - JCC v Eisenhower
    GBH - really serious harm - DPP v Smith
    Lots of smaller injuries can be GBH - Bollom / Brown
    Disease can be GBH - Dica
  27. 27M/R for s20intentionally/recklessly causing some harm - Mowatt
  28. 28S18 definitionWounding or causing GBH with intent to cause GBH - S18 OAPA 1861
  29. 29A/R of S18Wound - cut or break in continuity of skin - JCC v Eisenhower
    GBH - really serious harm - DPP v Smith
    Lots of smaller injuries can be GBH - Bollom / Brown
    Disease can be GBH - Dica
  30. 30M/R to S18Intention to cause serious harm (GBH)
  31. 31what happens before court?Summons / Charged
    Preliminary issues (any appearance in court before trial)
  32. 32what kind of preliminary issues are there?Medical issues
    Venue
    Plea (guilty/not guilty)
    Translators
    Bail
    Legal finance
  33. 33What is bail?Letting the defendant out until the date of his trial
  34. 34What act says there is a general right to bail?S4 Bail Act 1976
  35. 35what is police bail?Police officers can grant bail at any location immediately after arrest under the Criminal Justice Act 2003
  36. 36what conditions can police put on bail?Surrendering passport
    Returning regularly to police station etc
  37. 37what factors are considered when deciding bail?How serious the crime is / nature of crime
    Any previous crimes, associations, character
    What evidence is provided against the defendant
  38. 38What is court bail?Courts can decide to refuse bail if they believe:
    D would not surrender to custody
    They would commit an offence while on bail
    Interfere with witnesses
    In the interest of D's protection
  39. 39What are the court imposed conditions on bail?Surrender passport
    Return to police station regularly
    Decide where D should live - Bail hostel?
    Curfew - electric tag
    Sureties - someone to pay if D doesn't turn up to court
  40. 40when will bail be refusedWhen D is charged with murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, rape or attempted rape and has served a custodial sentence for a similar offence
    D was already on bail when committing the offence
  41. 41What is a summary offence?The least serious offence, trial in Magistrates court
  42. 42what is a triable either way offence?More serious, can be heard in either Magistrates or Crown Court
  43. 43What is an indictable offence?Most serious offence, preliminary hearing in Magistrates but trail heard in Crown Court
  44. 44what do magistrates court do?Issue arrest and search warrants
    Make decisions on bail applications
    Try summary and either way offences
    Preliminary hearing of indictable offences
  45. 45What do the crown court do?Try either way and indictable offences and any appeals
    Sentence cases where the magistrates refer to the crown court
  46. 46what is the relevance of the burden of proof?It must be proven by the prosecution that the D had committed the actus reus and mens rea of an offence at the same time - standard is beyond reasonable doubt
  47. 47What factors do court consider when sentencing?Aggravating/mitigating factors
    Sentencing tariff
    Guilty plea
    Degree of risk and extent of danger
    Background of D
    Maximum sentences
  48. 48What aggravating factors are there?Previous convictions
    If D was on bail
    Religious or racial hostility
    Hostility to disabled or homosexual
    If D was part of group
    V vulnerable
    Was V part of public service?
  49. 49what mitigating factors are there?Mental illness of D
    Physical illness of D
    No previous convictions
    Evidence of genuine guilt feeling
    Good co-operation with police
  50. 50What is plea bargaining?If D makes a guilty plea, they will receive a lesser sentence
  51. 51Plea and sending for trial - Summary offences1. Go to Magistrates - charge announced and D must enter plea
    2. Guilty - sentence there and then or adjourn for full report
    Not guilty - case adjourned - set date or have pre-trail review
  52. 52Plea and sending for trial - Either way offences1. Plea before venue
    2. Guilty - Magistrates unless they don't have power
    Not guilty - D gets to chose court but Magistrates may still send to Crown
  53. 53Plea and sending for trial - indictable1. First hearing at Magistrates Court - no plea
    2. Crown court - makes plea (plea and case management hearing)
    3. guilty - may sentence or wait for pre-trial review
    Not guilty - case adjourned, witnesses etc
  54. 54What are the four aims of sentencing?Retribution
    Deterrence
    Rehabilitation
    Reparation
  55. 55What is retribution?This is based on the idea of punishment - doesn't aim to reduce future crimes committed by D
    There are sentencing guidelines to guide judges
  56. 56What is individual deterrence?Making the defendant afraid of future punishment to make them not commit crimes in the future
  57. 57What is general deterrence?Where the general population is deterred from committing offences because of punishments to other people
  58. 58What is rehabilitation?Aims to get people back into society, often includes giving the D new skills or attending classes like anger management
  59. 59what is reparation?Compensating the victim for the crime by paying money or returning stolen goods
    Direct reparation - where the defendant comes face to face with the victims to see how their actions have had an affect
  60. 603 elements of negligence1. D owed C a duty of care
    2. D breached his duty
    3. The breach caused the damage/injury
  61. 61Whats the Caparo Test?1. was damage/harm reasonably foreseeable?
    2. is there a sufficiently proximate relationship between C and D?
    3. is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty?
  62. 62Where was damage reasonably foreseeable?Kent v Griffiths - failure of ambulance to arrive
    Jolley v Sutton London Borough council - foreseeable that boys would play on boat
  63. 63where wasn't damage foreseeable?Bourhill v Young
    Topp v london County Bus Ltd
  64. 64Explain proximityA duty will only arise if C and D have close enough relationship
    Hill v CC of West Yorkshire - V and police not close enough
    Osman v Ferguson - police knew the schoolboy
  65. 65Whats the meaning of fair, just and reasonable?The courts must find it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty, cant impose on public services
    Hill v CC of West Yorkshire
    Mitchell v Glasgow City Council
  66. 66Where was it shown to be fair to impose a duty?MPC v Reeves
    Capital & Counties v Hamshire CC
  67. 67how do we decide if someone has breached their duty of care?D has breached his duty when he goes beyond the standard of a reasonable man
  68. 68Who is the reasonable man?Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks : the ordinary man performing a particular task reasonably competently
  69. 69What are the different standards of care?The ordinary man
    The newbie
    The professional
    The young
  70. 70Explain the standard of the ordinary manWells v Cooper - expected to meet the same standard as a reasonable competent person doing the same task
  71. 71Explain the standard of the newbieNettleship v Weston - the expected standard of newbies is that of a reasonably competent person, there is no special rules if you've just started
  72. 72What is the standard of the professional?Bolam - the professional is judged against a standard set by other professionals in the same job
  73. 73What does the case of Bolitho state?1. does the conduct of the D fall below the standard of the ordinary competent professional?
    2. is there a substantial body of opinion within the profession that would support the decision taken by the defendant?
  74. 74What is the standard for the young?Mullins v Richards - the standard is of a reasonable person of the same age
  75. 75What does the case of Roe v Minister of Health concern?Foreseeable Risk: the defendant will not have breached their duty if the harm was not foreseeable
  76. 76Name the four risk factorsSpecial characteristics
    Size of the risk
    Practical precautions
    Benefits of taking the risk
  77. 772 cases for special characteristicsParis v Stepney Borough Council
    Walker v Northumberland CC
  78. 782 cases for size of the riskBolton v Stone
    Haley v London Electricity Board
  79. 792 cases for practical precautionsBolton v Stone
    Latimer v AEC
  80. 802 cases for benefits of risk takingWatt v Hertfordshire CC
    Day v High Performance Sports
  81. 81What case supports the but for test in negligence?Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospitals
  82. 82What is the case for a nous acts in negligence?MPC v Reeves
    Orange v CC of West Yorkshire
  83. 83What does remoteness of damage mean?the damage must not be too remote from D's negligence
  84. 84What does The Wagon Mound represent?If THE damage was reasonably foreseeable
  85. 85The type of injury must be foreseeable, which cases show this?Hughes v Lord Advocate
    Bradford v Robinson Rentals
    Doughty v Turner Asbestos
  86. 86Which case supports the thin skull rule for negligence?Smith v Leech Brain
  87. 87what are the civil courts?County court
    High court (QBD)
    Court of Appeal
    Supreme Court
  88. 88Where can you go for personal injury claims? (up to £50,000 and over £50,000)Up to - County court
    Over - county court or high court
  89. 89where can you go for damage to property claims? (unto £25,000 and over £25,000)Up to - county court
    Over - county court or high court
  90. 90How do you sue someone for negligence?1. Pre-action protocol - letter before claim
    2. Issue a claim form - 1 to D, 3 to court
    3. D must defend: admit and pay, admit but disagree with amount, dispute
    4. Dispute = serve defence within 14 days - extra 14 if serve acknowledgment of service
    5. Allocation questionnaire - select track
  91. 91What are damages?It is money/compensation that a claimant receives following a successful claim
  92. 92Whats the aim of damages?to put the claimant back in the position they were in before the incident (if the incident would not have occurred).
  93. 93What are general damages?damages that are difficult to put a figure on - pain, suffering, loss of amenity (PSLA)
    -future medical care and assistance
    - future loss of earnings
  94. 94How is it worked out how much is awarded for PSLA?JC headlines cover -
    cosmetic/psychological damage
    loss to quality of life/life expectancy
    temporary/permanent injury
    time spent in hospital or receiving additional treatment
    any ongoing pain
  95. 95What is loss of amenity?Compensating the claimant for loss of enjoyment or not being able to do their daily activities
  96. 96What are special damages?Compensating the C for any losses incurred up to the date of trail
    Given an exact figure:
    - medical expenses
    - loss of earnings
    - damage to goods
  97. 97How are damages paid?Normally, one lump sum
    Damages Act 1996 allowed the payment in a structured settlement
  98. 98What does res ipsa loquitur mean?the thing speaks for itself
  99. 99What has to be proven to use res ipsa loquitur?- D was in control of the situation
    - injury was more than likely cause by the negligence
    - there is no other explanation
  100. 100What must the D prove for the burden of proof?They must prove that they're not negligent
    - Scott v London and St Katherine Docks
    -Mohan v Osbourne
    - Pearson v North Western Gas Board

Information

Description
A level Law Flashcards on Law Unit 2, created by Kennedy Lee on 16/04/2017.
Created by
Kennedy Lee
Views
0
Rating

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?