Flowchart
Criminal Law

Flowchart: Criminal law
Flowchart content
Offences
principle of legality
NULLA POENA SINE LEGE
Serious offences
summary offences
severe nature, handled by district court
less severe, cantonal court
attempts & accessory not punishable
result offence
Conduct offence
focus on activity, regardless of result, e.g. theft
result important, e.g. manslaughter
CRIMINAL LAW
basic offence
qualified offence
preferential offence
e.g. theft
e.g. theft & battery
e.g. manslaughter
variant infanticide
Perpetratorship
no punishment without guilt
Milk and Water Judgement (NJ 1916, 681)
Motorcyclist's papers judgement (NJ 1950, 180)
Intent
Dolus
intent with purpose
awareness of high degreee of probability
dolus eventualis
Subjective components
Negligence
Culpa
Considerable Chance judgement
unconscious culpa
perpetrator does not realise recklessness
conscious culpa
p. knows risks, but hopes for best
PORSCHE CASE
-> differentiation
Justifications
GENERAL CONDITIONS
unlawfulness
Blameworthiness
self defense art. 41 para. 1 Criminal Code
FORCE MAJEURE AS NECESSITY, art. 40
Compliance with authorized official order art. 43 (1)
Performance of a legal duty art.42
Absence of substantive unlawfulness, UNWRITTEN
DEFENSES
Excuses
DURESS
Unreasonable use of self-defense art. 41 para. 2
Compliance with unauthorized official order art. 43 (2)
Mental disorder,
art. 39
Absence of guilt, UNWRITTEN
subsidiarity
proportionality
s.d. must be necessary! No reasonble alternative
may still rely on art. 41 para. 2, if unproportionate
Optician Case -> conflict of duties: moral vs. law, same requirements as s.d.
counterparts
"external force the suspect was not able to resist nor needed to resist"
Classification: What would a reasonable person do?
Veterinary Judgement vaccination by violating act
"violent emotion", attack
"believed [...] order was issued by the proper authority"
Milk and Water Judgement
The trial
charge list
includes:
-offence
-time & place
-violated statutes
art. 261 para. 1
one charge sheet per offence
alternative charge lists for offences, which exclude each other
Preliminary questions of art. 348 & 349 Criminal Procedure Code
decision model
1. Writ of summons valid? art. 261 para. 1
3. Prosecution Service admissable?
-Defendant not deceased (art. 69 PC)
-Charge not extinguished by limitation? (art. 70 PC.)
-No double jeopardy =ne bis in idem? (art. 68 PC)
-Defendant not under 12 years?
2. Judge / court competent?
YES
YES
YES
Fundamental questions art. 350
CONTINUE WITH ...
summons null and void
Lack of jurisdiction
Prosecution barred, inadmissable.
NO
NO
NO
NO