null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
8697732
Causation
Description
Incomplete
Flowchart by
Amanda Tay
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
Amanda Tay
about 9 years ago
30
0
0
Resource summary
Flowchart nodes
Causation
Factual Causation
But for test: Lord Denning in Cork v Kirby Maclean
Barnett v Chelsea Hospital(omission)
Applies to both actions and omissions
How claimant would have responded: McWilliams v Sir William Arrol
Legal Causation
Novus Actus Interveniens
Additional Causes
Cumulative CausesMore than one operative cause, each by a different defendant
Merged agent caused harm
Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw
Innocent dust and Guilty dust: both one whole of same agent
Test: material contribution to injury
Did guilty dust materially contribute to the dust inhaled?
Calculating damages
Divisible damages
Indivisible damages
Holby v Brigham: Proportionate damages - adding up the total time/amount of exposure to asbestos then seeing the percentage D is responsible for
Death, pregnancy, etc.
Each is liable jointly and severally for the whole amount
Claimant can sue either or all defendants for the full amount
Successive Causes2 different causes, each sufficient to bring about the harm
Not part of the same causal chain
D1 --> D2
Starting with D2
Starting with D1
Tort --> Tort
Performance Cars v Abraham
Baker v Willoughby
Tort --> Non-Tort
Car already required the paint job etc., so not D2's fault
Jobling v Associated Dairies
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Flowcharts
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Browse Library