2639855
Description
Mind Map by Nanami Tachikawa, updated more than 1 year ago
|
Created by Nanami Tachikawa
about 9 years ago
|
|
SRH program general evaluation
- Reproductive health: people can have
a responsible, satisfying and safe sex
life and that they have the capability
to reproduce and the freedom to
decide if, when and how often to do
so.
- The right of men and women: to be
informed of and to have access to safe,
effective, affordable and acceptable
methods of fertility regulation of their
choice, and the right of access to appropriate
health care services that will enable women
to go safely through pregnancy and
childbirth and provide couples with the best
chance of having a healthy infant.
- SRH programmes
- Evaluation
- To know if the components are functioning successfully?
- What is it going to measure? How will it be measured? What indicators will be used? How will the
evaluation results be incorporated into future decision-making? Who will carry out the evaluations?
Who will use the results of the evaluations and for what purpose?
- Process/performance evaluation
- Evaluate intermediate (programme-level) objectives or Evaluate effects
measured in terms of programme output
- By using data and measures
produced or obtained at the
programme level
- quantitative
- client
records
- client
follow-up
surveys
- service
statistics
- Commodity
inventories
and Logistics
Information
Systems
- Management
information
systems and
service
statistics
- Acceptor data
- Measure the quantity or
magnitude of something
Amenable to statistical analysis
- Survey
- client
records
- qualitative
- observation
- focus group discussions
- in-depth interviews
- key informants
- mystery shopper
- programme document reviews
- Goal is to measure subjective dimensions
Cannot (should not?) take an average/mean
of qualitative variables
- observation
- Validity
- The degree to which the
method for collecting
information results in
accurate information
- The
researcher has
to rely on the
woman’s own
account of
these events.
age at first
menstration.
number of
pregnancy...
but cannot be
sure if these
accounts are
correct.
- The
researcher has
to rely on the
woman’s own
account of
these events.
age at first
menstration.
number of
pregnancy...
but cannot be
sure if these
accounts are
correct.
- The degree to which the
method for collecting
information results in
accurate information
- Reliability
- Degree to which
observations of a study
are repeatable
- A measuring
instrument is
reliable if it
generates
consistent
observations at 2
points in time. two
times interviews -
if the same results,
the data are
reliable (not valid)
- A measuring
instrument is
reliable if it
generates
consistent
observations at 2
points in time. two
times interviews -
if the same results,
the data are
reliable (not valid)
- Degree to which
observations of a study
are repeatable
- quantitative
- Program output:
- # of service
users/accepters
- service quality
- % of a target population
- # of service
users/accepters
- Program input
- the delivery
of inputs
(Programme
services)
- the delivery
of inputs
(Programme
services)
- efficiency
(cost
effectiveness
- By using data and measures
produced or obtained at the
programme level
- Evaluate intermediate (programme-level) objectives or Evaluate effects
measured in terms of programme output
- Impact evaluation
- short term e.g.:
contraceptive
prevalence
- long term
e.g.: fertility
trends
- data collected at the population
level
- qualitative
- quantitative
- Country-level data
- trends analysis
- Survey data
- Most important
source of information
for outcome
evaluation
- Evaluation relies
heavily on survey
data for
measurement of
changes in
demographic and
health behaviour
e.g.: contraceptive
use, fertility
- Contraceptive
Prevalence Surveys
(CPS) World Fertility
Survey (WFS)
Demographic and
Health Surveys
(DHS)
- Most important
source of information
for outcome
evaluation
- Survey data
- Experiment studies
- " xxx" averted
- as advocacy tool; tools for
further estimation of maternal
mortality/morbidity - unsafe
abortion/contraceptive use
- as advocacy tool; tools for
further estimation of maternal
mortality/morbidity - unsafe
abortion/contraceptive use
- Country-level data
- qualitative
- essentially cannot separate program and non-program effects!
- short term e.g.:
contraceptive
prevalence
- Process/performance evaluation
- What is it going to measure? How will it be measured? What indicators will be used? How will the
evaluation results be incorporated into future decision-making? Who will carry out the evaluations?
Who will use the results of the evaluations and for what purpose?
- To know if the components are functioning successfully?
- Design
- Implementation
- family planning
- Unmet need
- CPR
- Ever use
- CPY
- Continuation rates
- User failure rates
- # of users
- pregnancies, births, (unsafe) abortions/child deaths averted
- Unmet need
- safe abortion
- unsafe aboirtions/maternal deaths averted
- unsafe aboirtions/maternal deaths averted
- delivery by trained and skilled birth attendants
- maternal deaths averted/child deaths averted
- maternal deaths averted/child deaths averted
- emergency obstetric interventions
- maternal/child deaths averted
- maternal/child deaths averted
- sub-population targeted campaigns e.g.: men, adolescents, refugees etc
- STI counselling, prevention and treatment
- STI rates
- STI rates
- safe motherhood campaigns
- Evaluation
- SRH programmes
Want to create your own Mind Maps for free with GoConqr? Learn more.