Language Teaching Materials and the (Very) Big Picture1

Description

Based on a reading, we developed this mind map in order to resume the main ideas and dates that the author stated and also other authors who defined a wide view of how we develop material and some social implications.
Camila Sierra
Mind Map by Camila Sierra, updated more than 1 year ago More Less
Laura Moreno
Created by Laura Moreno over 8 years ago
Camila Sierra
Copied by Camila Sierra over 8 years ago
13
0

Resource summary

Language Teaching Materials and the (Very) Big Picture1
  1. 2. ELT materials: the 1950s to the 1980s
    1. Britain and North America are the sources of much innovation in ELT methodology
      1. History is neatly divided into decades, as historians are apt to do, recognising that most of the social events and materials
        1. 2.1 The 1950s/60s and the Cold War
          1. The ensuing tensions produced the ‘Cold War,’ so called because, although open hostilities never broke out, they were rarely far from the surface, and constantly in the rhetoric of politicians.
            1. The 1958 National Defense (Foreign Language) Act was swiftly ushered in, providing massive funds for the development of language programmes
              1. An example of a pattern practice exercise (Lado & Fries, 1958, p. 7).
                1. The nett effect is that behaviourism in one form of another has been firmly cemented into language teaching materials, with its persistence right up to the present day, as the continuing use of drills, substitution tables and such like, demonstrates.
                2. 2.2 The late 1960s to the late 1970s
                  1. The period from the late 1960s onwards is characterised by the emergence of numer- Language Teaching Materials and the (Very) Big Picture 287 ‘fringe,’ humanistic methodologies, which, although rarely implemented, were much talked about and cited.
                    1. A humanistic language practice exercise (Moscowitz, 1978, pp. 62–63).
                      1. Interestingly, we also saw the origins of another example of the rejection of mainstream, establishment methodologies in a new perspective on language acquisition theory: Krashen’s Input Hypothesis.
                      2. 2.3 The 1970s to the mid 1980s
                        1. The process of embourgeoisement in which the increasingly affluent working class populations of the developed economies were said to be taking on the individualist mindset of the middle classes, had firmly taken root.
                          1. In 1970s the ‘Me Decade.’ This became particularly evident as sub-groupings began to voice their separate identities. It is in this period, for example, that we saw the further, marked development of feminism (the so-called ‘Second Wave’), a struggle for the recognition of the status of different cultures and minorities
                            1. An early example of English for special purposes materials (Pearson, 1978, p. 17)
                              1. Also of particular note during this ‘me decade’ was the recognition that learners have their own unique ways of approaching language study, that is, their own styles and strategies.
                              2. Extract from Ellis and Sinclair’s “Learning to Learn English” (1989, p. 6)
                                1. As a clear break from the top-down regime of grammar rules and specifications of rights and wrongs in language form, CLT championed not the way language should be but rather how ordinary people use it. Users mattered, not rules.
                                2. 3. NEW IMPERATIVES ON MATERIALS DESING: THE MID 1980s ONWARDS
                                  1. spirit of times VS Cause-effect
                                    1. External influences to language teaching implementations
                                      1. The desing of classroom works depends on social attitudes too.
                                        1. ''Why are ELT materials the way they are?''
                                          1. 3.1 Mcdonaldization
                                            1. characterised by an absolute emphasis on efficiency and total predictability and is increasingly ‘colonising’ other areas of social life
                                              1. Ritzer states that society itself is becoming ‘caged’ as we are locked evermore into scripted, predictable, homogenised environments of consumption.
                                                1. Gray and Block (2012), in a provocative paper, discusses how far a process of McDonaldization is evident in the standardisation of teacher training in specific cases.
                                              2. 3.2 Neo-Liberalism
                                                1. relates to a much broader analysis of the social context in which language teaching takes place, that of the nature of society as a whole.
                                                  1. has its origins in the work of classical economists such as Adam Smith and his famous text from 1776, “The Wealth of Nations.” Today, however, it is most closely associated with the dismantling of state intervention, particularly in the stripping back of welfare programmes, state subsidies, state control of industries, and so on.
                                                  2. For the market to function as the determiner of all, neo-liberalism requires the commodifica- tion of interactions, whether they involve a physical product or an intangible service.
                                                2. TO CONCLUDE: this is precisely where we need to start in language teaching, by resisting the manner in which uniformity is being imposed, and by wrestling back curriculum decisions into the hands of those directly involved – teachers and learners.
                                                  1. For materials designers, this means not being complicit in a scripting of classroom events. It means designing tasks which are open-ended and which have the potential of producing unique outcomes each time they are used. It means developing teacher guides which encourage and support experimenting, rather than providing the familiar blow-by-blow instructions.
                                                    1. Above all, it means imagining lan- guage learning and language teaching as something not locked into neat, prescriptivist listings of packaged levels and competences.
                                        2. By:: Camila Sierra & Laura Moreno
                                          Show full summary Hide full summary

                                          Similar

                                          SAT Vocabulary
                                          Muffins31
                                          IMAGS Employment Examination for Applicants
                                          mike_101290
                                          English Grammatical Terminology
                                          Fionnghuala Malone
                                          Cold War Causes Revision
                                          Tom Mitchell
                                          NeuroAnatomy
                                          أطباء 2020
                                          Market Segementation
                                          Noah Swanson
                                          Globalisation Case Studies
                                          annie
                                          Ch. 2 Ancient Mesopotamia & Egypt
                                          msandovalbarrios
                                          The Nervous System and Hormones (Part 1)
                                          Naomi Science
                                          Gatsby notes on symbolism and themes
                                          Maria-Rodriguez
                                          1PR101 2.test - Část 17.
                                          Nikola Truong