Dimensions of cultural variability: individualism & collectivism
INDIVIDUALISC CULTURES:
many ingroups > specific
influence
self- disclosure (direct
communicatin style)
COLLECTIVISTIC
CULTURES: only few
ingroups > they
influence individuals
behaviour a lot
individual behavior contains both individualistic and
collevistic values
The self mediates the influence of individualism- collectivism on
communication behaviour:
1. PERSONALITY: allocentrism - idiocentrism
Allo: attention is
focused on other
people
Idiocentric: focus on self/
correlates with loneliness
2. VALUES > maintain & enhance self
-esteem. Values can be individualistic,
collectivistic or mixed
3. SELF- CONSTRUALS: Members of cultures can see themselves in other ways
Independent VS. Interdependent
Everyone has both construals, even though one is mostly active
(depends on context)
HIGH- CONTEXT COMMUNICATION: information is
internalized in the person and little is in the explicit part of
the message (talk around the point)
SILENCE: communicative act
LOW- CONTEXT COMMUNICATION: most information is
vested in the explicit code (more direct; use words certainly
and absolutely; usually members of individualistic cultures
(1) QUALITY MAXIM: truth & evidence
(2) RELEVANCY MAXIM: fits the context
(3) MANENR MAXIM: clear expression & clarity
communicate personal things >
are more sincere
SILENCE is seen as a violation
Uncertainty avoidance
HIGH: > higher anxiety, formal rules & value truth &
coherence
LOW: > lower stress &
accept risks more
Power distance:
High
-Accept power as part of society.
-Do not question superior's orders.
-Outgroup members = outsiders >
less power. -Less cooperation with
outgroup members. -Low level of
egalitarianism
Low
- Power should be used legitimately.
-High level of egalitarianism
Extent less powerful
individuals/ organizations
accept that power is
distributed unequally
Masculinity- femininity
High masculinity: value power & assertiveness, have strong motivation to
achieve well. See jobs central to life & value advancement. See same- sex
relationships as more intimate.
Low in both: undifferentiated sex role
High in both: androgynous sex role
Emotion display
NEUROCULTURAL THEORY OF EMOTION
Innate system which stores universal
emotions and the cultural display rules
Individualistic - collectivistic culture
Ingroup- outgroup theory:
People of COLLECTIVISTIC
cultures: positive emotions to
ingroup & more negative
emotions to the outgroup
INDIVIDUALISTIC cultures:
negative emotions to the ingroup
& more positive emotions to
members of the outgroup
Power distance
High PD: Display more positive emotions to others of higher status
and more negative emotions to others of lower status
maintains status in relation to others
Low PD: Display more negative emotions to
others of higher status and more positive
emotions to others of lower status
Emotion display in male- male interactions
Appropriateness depends on 3 factors:
Relation type (family/ friend)
Emotion intensity of the context
(highly charged: weddigns/ funerals)
Privacy level of the context: public/ private
Risk of affection: People might interpret affection as something else, especially in male-male
relationships
Experiment hypothesis & result: Affection between men was considered to be more
appropriate among brothers than among male friends, in emotionally charged situations
more than in emotionally neutral situations, and in public contexts more than in private
contexts
The self and health persuasion
Health messages are more persuasive if: the message
content matches the recipient's AFFECTIVE, COGNITIVE or
MOTIVATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS. < culture influences
these
Cultural consideration of the self:
How people see themselves in
relation to other people and their
goals
> creates more effective health messages
Individualistic: Dominant form iof the self is
independent (agents)
Collectivistic: dominant form of self is interdependent
THE REGULATORY FOCUS THEORY
Individuals from collectivistic cultures are more focused on PREVENTION and
sensitive to the presence or absence of NEGATIVE OUTCOMES
Are persuaded better with LOSS- FRAMED MESSAGES (avoidance behaviour)
INDIVIDUALISTIC CULTURES: focus more on PROMOTION and are sensitive to the
presence or absence of POSITIVE OUTCOMES
Are presuaded better with GAIN FRAMED MESSAGES (approach
behaviour)
independent self > personal goals & consequences;
But also: INCREASED PERSONAL
RELEVANCE CAN LEAD TO
GREATER DEFENSIVE PROCESSES!
< THE CULTURAL CONGRUECNY HYPOTHESIS: >
Must match the health message to the orientation of the target culture
SELF- AFFIRMATION THEORY
Goal of the self-system is to maintain an image of self-integrity rather than
responding to specific threats
When self-affirmation is provided, a defensive response might be
reduced
Useful framework for
understanding when
psychological constructs will
be effective or ineffective in
attempts of health persuasion