5082225
Description
Mind Map by personal.sapch, updated more than 1 year ago
More
|
Created by beth.clough
about 8 years ago
|
|
|
Copied by personal.sapch
about 8 years ago
|
|
The Judicial
Precedent
- Court of
Appeal
- Young v Bristol (1944)
allows 3 exception for
the CA to avoid its own
previous decisions
- 1) Where the previous
decision conflicts with
a later HL decision,
then the CA must
follow the HL decision.
- 2) Where there are 2 conflicting
previous CA decisions then the CA
must choose which one to reject.
- 3) If the previous decision was
made per incuriam then it will lose
its binding force.
- 1) Where the previous
decision conflicts with
a later HL decision,
then the CA must
follow the HL decision.
- Young v Bristol (1944)
allows 3 exception for
the CA to avoid its own
previous decisions
Want to create your own Mind Maps for free with GoConqr? Learn more.