Mind map
R v DICA
Map content
R v DICA
Trial
- First Instance
- Crown court
- Convicted of 2 counts of GBH
- 8 years
- Defence
- 2 women had consented
- Court of Appeal
- Judge misdirected the jury
- Ordered a retrial
- Confirmed he was guilty
- Lesser sentence
- 1 and a half years
- Outcome
- Overruled Clarence
- R v R
- Outdated offence
- R v R
- No informed consent
- Obiter statement: The principles in Brown said consent was no defence to a section 18 offence
- Overruled Clarence
- First Instance
Informed Consent
- Yes
- Can use defence
- Should have told the women
- Can use defence
- No
- No defence
- They were not fully aware
- No defence
- Yes
Links to Cases
- Krozani 2005
- Olugboja 1982
- Currier 1998
- Clarence 1888
Link to source
- 2
Development of Consent
- Sexual intercourse and consent
- Informed consent
- Offences Against the Person
- Created new offence of biological GBH
- Charged under s.20
Information
- Description
- A2 level Law (Consent) Mind Map on R v DICA, created by ellenclare on 21/06/2016.
- Created by
- ellenclare
- Views
- 18
- Tags
- Rating