O GoConqr está de visual novo! Conte para nós o que você achou.

Flashcards

Research Methods

Lauren Burgess Psychology AS - Level Inglês 80 flashcards

Flashcards do conjunto (80)

  1. 1Extraneous VariablesParticipant variables
    Situational variables
    Experimenter variables
    Found before the experiment is conducted
  2. 2Advantages of lab experimentsInfer cause and effect
    Easily replicated
    More objective than others
  3. 3Disadvantages of lab experimentsLow in ecological validity
    Demand characteristics
    Evaluation Apprehension
  4. 4Field experimentsExperimental investigations carried out in the natural environment.
    Still manipulate IV
    Not as controlled as lab.
    High ecological validity
    No demand characteristics
  5. 5Advantages of field experimentsGood ecological validity
    Can infer cause and effect
    No demand characteristics
  6. 6Disadvantages of field experimentsCannot control extraneous variable so changes in DV may not be from the manipulation of IV.
    Difficult to replicate.
    Lack of informed consent
    Issues with right to withdraw
    Some can't be debriefed
  7. 7Internal validityIs the method measuring what it intends to measure?
  8. 8Temporal validityCan it be generalized over different time periods?
  9. 9Population ValidityCan it be generalized to the target population
  10. 10Natural experimentsThe IV is naturally occuring
  11. 11Advantages of natural experimentsHigh eco-logical validity
    No demand characteristics
    Investigates the effects of IV that would be unethical to manipulate
  12. 12Disadvantages of natural experimentsLack of control of extraneous variables
    Cannot infer cause and effect (lacks internal validity)
    Not reliable
    Sample bias
    Time consuming and expensive
  13. 13Quasi experimentIV that is based on an existing difference between people, no one ha manipulated this variable it simply exists
  14. 14Strengths and limitations of quasiControlled conditions-share strengths of lab
    Cannot randomly allocate pps-cofounding variables
  15. 15HypothesisTestable research predictions of what you expect to happen.
  16. 163 types of hypothesisExperimental
    Alternative
    Null
  17. 17ExperimentalA statement of the predicated outcome when using an experimental method.
    A predication of what will happen to the DV when the IV changes
  18. 18AlternativeA statement of the predicted outcome when using any method
  19. 19NullA statement suggesting the IV will have no effect
    States that the IV will have no effect the DV
    Used to prove that their is no relationship between two variables
  20. 20Limitations of operational definitionsThe definer may place subjective meanings on words.
    The definition may only cover part of the actual meaning
  21. 21OperationalisationDefining all variables in such a way that it is easy to measure them.
  22. 22Pilot studyTrial study
    checks conditions are adequate- time etc
    Instructions are standardized
    All terms/variables are operationalized
  23. 23Content analysisTake qualitative data and analyse it to draw conclusions, looking at key themes/phrases in the text.
    1. read text
    2.Pick out key themes/phrases
    3. create a table for tallys
    4. Re-read text and tally themes
  24. 24Advantages to content analysisGreat to study emotions and motivation
    can establish what caused the behaviour
  25. 25Disadvantages to content analysisCan't generalize
    Not scientific- no statisitcs
    Subjective
    Lacks internal validity due to ambiguous language
  26. 26Case studiesA very detailed study into the life and background of one person/small group.
    Researchers may look at past records-e.g medical
    Use qualitative methods
    Explains behaviour in descriptive words
  27. 27Advantages of case studiesRich detail- how past may relate to their present behaviour
    Allows the study of unique behaviours that couldn't be studied in any other way
  28. 28Disadvantages of case studiesUnreliable- No two case studies are alike
    Cannot be generalised
    lacks external validity
    Researcher bias
    Retrospective data- inaccurate or distorted
  29. 29Correlational AnalysisNon experimental, experimenter does not manipulate
    Measures the relationship between two variables
    Look at the strength of the relationship
    Scatter graph
  30. 30Positive correlationAs one variable increases the other variable increases
  31. 31Negative correlationAs one variable increases the other decreases
  32. 32correlation co-efficientEvery correlation has a number called the correlation co-efficient- this is a measure of how strong the relationship is.
    Number can range from +1 to -1
    Spread out scatter graph = low co-efficient
    Closer to a straight line, the higher the co-efficient
  33. 33Advantages of correlationsAllows predications to be made
    Allows the quantification of relationships
    No manipulation- ethical
  34. 34Disadvantages of correlationsCannot establish cause and effect
    Extraneous relationship
    Problems when reading the results- lack of correlation may show no relationship
    Only works for linear relationship
  35. 35Random samplingpeople are picked randomly- equal chances
    >Difficult to obtain
    >Could still lack population validity
  36. 36Systematic SamplingA sample frame is produced and a system is placed on how they pick out people- e.g. every third person on the list
    >Free from researcher bias
    >Fairly representative
  37. 37Opportunity SamplingThe researcher uses participants that are there at the time in a place. e.g- students in a particular room
    >Lacks population validity
  38. 38Volunteer samplingPps chose to partake in the study
    > Very bias sample as only certain people will respond
  39. 39Reducing biasThe single blind condition-
    Pps do not know which condition they are being tested
    The double blind condition-
    The experimenter & pps does not know the conditions under which the participants are being tested
  40. 40Open ended questionsDoes not have a fixed range of answers
  41. 41Advantages to open ended questions>Unique answers
    >no limit
    >vary in detail
    >permit creativity and self expressions
  42. 42Disadvantages to open ended questions>Low response rate
    >Too general
    >Effort is necessary
    >Answers can be difficult to analyse
    >Can't be generalized
    >Ambiguous language
  43. 43Semi-structured interviewsCombines some pre-determined questions and some other questions that are developed in response to answers given.
  44. 44Advantages to semi-structured interviews>Depth and detail
    >Analytic power
    >Freedom of speech
    >Rapport
    >Can be prepared ahead of time
  45. 45Disadvantages to semi-structured interviews>More time consuming and costly, so smaller sample sizes
    >No trigger or interaction effects of group
  46. 46Strucutred interviewsQuantitaive research method, in survey research. Aims to ensure that the interview has same questions in same order
  47. 47Advantages of structured interviews>Reach a large sample
    >Straight forward to replicate
    >Format reduces differences between interviewers
  48. 48Disadvantages of structured interviews>Can't go off topic- don't explore question
    >Time consuming
  49. 49Unstructured interviewsIncludes one starting question, but then the rest of the interview flows based on what the interviewer tells you.
    >open ended questions
  50. 50Advantages to unstructured interviews>Ecological validity
    >Allows researchers the opportunity to test out their preliminary understanding.
  51. 51Disadvantages to unstructured interviews>No IV
    >Lack of control
    >Not reliable
    >Interviewer bias
    >Hard to analyse
  52. 52ObservationsCan occur as part of a laboratory study- controlled observations
    Most observations occur naturally- naturalistic observation.
    You must operationalize- behaviour categories
  53. 53Structured observationWhere there are behavioural categories in place
  54. 54Unstructured observationWhere the observer simply writes down everything they see
  55. 55Event samplingCounting the number of times a particular event occurs
  56. 56Time samplingRecording behaviour in a pre-established time frame
  57. 57Natural observationsHigh ecological validity
    Lacks control
  58. 58Controlled observationsConducted in a lab
    High level of control
    Low eco-logical validity
  59. 59Controlled observations- Observer bias, how to over come1. Operationalize
    2.Double blind condition- pps and psychologist are both unaware of the hypothesis
  60. 60Inter observer reliabilityMore than one observer making notes. They both then compare to check reliability.
  61. 61Ecological validityCan it be generalized to real life settings?
  62. 62Ethical guidelines1.Informed consent
    2.Deception
    3.Protection from harm
    4.Debrief
    5. Confidentiallity
    6.Right to withdraw
  63. 63Solutions to informed consent1.Presumptive consent
    2.Retrospective consent
    3.Prior general consent
  64. 64Presumptive consentAsking the opinions of members of the population to see if they would do it. If most of them agree you can assume someone that you haven't asked would be likely to partake.
  65. 65Retrospective consentDuring debriefing pps should be asked if they can use their data
  66. 66Prior general consentGetting the pps to agree to to the research through a ruse
  67. 67Experimental desginIndependent Groups
    Repeated measures
    Matched pairs
  68. 68Independent groupsTwo different groups of pps experience two different conditions.
  69. 69Evaluation of independent groupsIndividual differences- may not be an affect of the DV to deal with this they use random allocation so pps are less likely to guess aims
  70. 70Repeated measuresAll participants experience both conditions
  71. 71Evaluation of repeated measuresCan suffer from order effects.
    -particpants may have had practice, or become fatigued- effects internal validity
    To stop this use counter-balancing
  72. 72Counter-balacingChanges in the order of the conditions
    The sample is split into two groups experimental (A) and control (B). For example, group 1 does ‘A’ then ‘B’, group 2 does ‘B’ then ‘A’ this is to eliminate order effects.
  73. 73Matched pairsOne pair must be randomly assigned to the experimental group and the other to the control group.
    Matched Pairs Experimental Design
    Pro: Reduces participant (i.e. extraneous) variables because the researcher has tried to pair up the participants so that each condition has people with similar abilities and characteristics.
    Pro: Avoids order effects, and so counterbalancing is not necessary.
    Con: Very time-consuming trying to find closely matched pairs.
    Con: Impossible to match people exactly, unless identical twins!
  74. 74Measures of central tendencyThe general term for measure of average for a set of data, e.g, mean, mode, meadian.
  75. 75Measures of dispersionThe general term for the measure of spread or variation within a set of data.
    Consistency is better- smaller number of spread= higher consistency
  76. 76ScattergramsShows association between two variables-relationship
  77. 77Bar chartsDiscrete data
  78. 78Standard deviationHow far the all the values in the data set are away from the mean (mid point)
    The lower the standard deviation, the closer the scores are.
  79. 79HistogramsContinuous data
  80. 80Line graphContinuous data

Informações

Descrição
AS - Level Psychology FlashCards sobre Research Methods , criado por Lauren Burgess em 19-11-2015.
Criado por
Lauren Burgess · nov 2015
Atualizado
11 mai 2016
Visualizações
3
Avaliação

Fale Conosco

Sobre o que é sua mensagem?

O que você acha do novo visual?

Você gostou?