Mapa mental
Forgetting
Conteúdo do mapa
Forgetting
Incidental forgetting
- Memory failures occurring w/o the intention to forget
Motivated forgetting
- A broad term - normal forgetting and triggered by motivations but lacking conscious intention
- Parker et al. (2008) The case of AJ > she remembers everyday of her life since teens
- A broad term - normal forgetting and triggered by motivations but lacking conscious intention
The relation between forgetting and time
- Forgetting increases as time progresses
- Ebbinghaus (1913) found a logarithmic relation between time and forgetting
- The forgetting curve shows that info is losses very rapidly first and then levels off
- Forgetting personal memories
- Meeter et al. (2005) Widely publisiced events > recall dropped from 60 to 30% after a year (recognition only dropped to 52%)
The nature of forgetting
- More is recognized than can be recalled (Tulving)
- Availability > is the item in the memory store?
- Accessibility > can the item be retrieved after being stored?
- More is recognized than can be recalled (Tulving)
When do we forget?
- When traces decay
- A memory trace is a physical change in the brain
- If traces are not used they will decay over time
- What decays?
- A memory's activation (underlying memory is left intact)
- A memory's associations along with its activity levels
- Devay in LTM often called "disuse" - use it or lose it
- When there is interference
- Hard to discriminate between similar memories - similar traces will increase over time
- Interference = whenever the cue used to access a target becomes associated with other memories
- Competition assumption (Anderson et al., 1994)
- Interefrence increases with the number of competitors a target has
- Ex. competition from noun meaning of 'duck' when asking for related verb 'crouch'
- Interefrence increases with the number of competitors a target has
- Cue-overload principle
- Recall decreases with the number of to be remembered items that are paired with the same cue
- Retroactive interference
- Recently learned info effect retrieval of similar older memories
- Barnes and Underwood (1959) Memory as a function of second-list learning
- Baddeley and Hitch (1977) RI in everyday life
- Rugby players > time did not increase forgetting, the number of intervening games did
- Proactive interference
- Older memories interfere with the retrieval of recent experiences/knowledge
- PI effects are more severe when recall is tested rather than recognition
- Retrieval induced forgetting
- Retrieval can harm recall of other memories related to the retrieved item
- Retrieval practice paradigm (Anderson et al., 1994)
- Perform retrieval practice on 'orange' and not 'banana' for a drink category - 73% recalled orange, 38% recalled banana
- RIF in the real world
- In school
- Reviewing facts
- Answering MCQ and essays
- Interrogation of witnesses
- In school
- When retrieval induces forgetting
- When traces decay
Why do we forget?
- Blocking
- Associative blocking
- When a cue fails to elicit a target trace because it repeatedly elicits a stronger competitor, leading people to abandon efforts to retrieve the target
- Unlearning
- The associative bond linking a stimulus to a memory trace will be weakened when the trace is retrieved in error when a different trace is sought
- Associative blocking
- Inhibition
- A reduction in the activity level of a contextually inappropriate response
- Properties of RIF
- Cue independence
- If 'banana' is inhibited it should be harder to retrieve even when generalized to unrelated cues (monkey-b___)
- Retrieval specificity
- Active retrieval from LTM is necessary to induce forgetting of 'banana' (fruit-or___)
- Strength independence/ interference dependence
- Blocking hypothesis predicts that any method of strengthening (retrieval or not) is sufficient
- Cue independence
- Blocking
Informações
- Descrição
- Mapa Mental sobre Forgetting, criado por Christiana Lucin em 02-05-2014.
- Criado por
- Christiana Lucin · mai 2014
- Atualizado
- 19 fev 2016
- Visualizações
- 17
- Avaliação