GoConqr has a new look! Let us know what you think.

Sign up free

Quiz

e w t

lucy duckmanton 12 questions

Take the quiz

This quiz has question types that open in the usual player.

Questions in this quiz (12)

  1. 1EWT is used [blank_start]regularly[blank_end] in the [blank_start]legal[blank_end] system. It would be extremely [blank_start]difficult[blank_end] to convict many [blank_start]guilty[blank_end] people [blank_start]without[blank_end] it. The vast [blank_start]majority[blank_end] of [blank_start]evidence[blank_end] on EWT is [blank_start]against[blank_end] its use, it's been proved [blank_start]multiple[blank_end] times that the human [blank_start]memory[blank_end] has its [blank_start]limits[blank_end] and can be [blank_start]manipulated[blank_end] by [blank_start]outside[blank_end] factors. Elizabeth [blank_start]Loftus[blank_end], a [blank_start]cognitive[blank_end] psychologist and memory [blank_start]expert[blank_end], has carried out over [blank_start]200[blank_end] studies on this particular [blank_start]area[blank_end].
    1. Alegal
    2. Bregularly
    3. Cdifficult
    4. Dguilty
    5. Ewithout
    6. Fmajority
    7. Gevidence
    8. Hagainst
    9. Imultiple
    10. Jmemory
    11. Klimits
    12. Lmanipulated
    13. Moutside
    14. NLoftus
    15. Oexpert
    16. Pcognitive
    17. Q200
    18. Rarea
  2. 2FOR - [blank_start]POST-EVENT[blank_end] EXPERIENCES
    EWT research is [blank_start]misleading[blank_end] because it focuses on [blank_start]details[blank_end] that aren't [blank_start]relevant[blank_end] to the [blank_start]events[blank_end] or that are [blank_start]difficult[blank_end] to [blank_start]estimate[blank_end]. May be more [blank_start]susceptible[blank_end] to [blank_start]corruption[blank_end]. Not [blank_start]all[blank_end] research suggests that post-event [blank_start]information[blank_end] is [blank_start]misleading[blank_end]. [blank_start]Loftus[blank_end] [blank_start]1979[blank_end] showed participants [blank_start]slides[blank_end] of a man [blank_start]stealing[blank_end] a big [blank_start]red[blank_end] purse. The participants were then [blank_start]exposed[blank_end] to [blank_start]misleading[blank_end] information including a [blank_start]statement[blank_end] that the purse was [blank_start]brown[blank_end]. [blank_start]98[blank_end]% of people [blank_start]correctly[blank_end] remembered the purse was [blank_start]red[blank_end], which suggests [blank_start]EWT[blank_end] for [blank_start]key[blank_end] [blank_start]details[blank_end] may be more [blank_start]resistant[blank_end] to [blank_start]distortion[blank_end] from [blank_start]post-event[blank_end] information than previously [blank_start]suggested[blank_end].
    1. Amisleading
    2. BPOST-EVENT
    3. Cdetails
    4. Drelevant
    5. Edifficult
    6. Festimate
    7. Gevents
    8. Hsusceptible
    9. Icorruption
    10. Jall
    11. Kinformation
    12. Lmisleading
    13. MLoftus
    14. N1979
    15. Oslides
    16. Pred
    17. Qstealing
    18. Rexposed
    19. Smisleading
    20. Tstatement
    21. Ubrown
    22. V98
    23. Wcorrectly
    24. Xred
    25. YEWT
    26. Zdetails
    27. AAkey
    28. ABresistant
    29. ACdistortion
    30. ADpost-event
    31. AEsuggested
  3. 3FOR - CRIMES ARE [blank_start]EMOTIVE[blank_end] [blank_start]EXPERIENCES[blank_end]
    When we [blank_start]experience[blank_end] events that are very [blank_start]emotionally[blank_end] [blank_start]shocking[blank_end], we create a particularly [blank_start]long-lasting[blank_end] and [blank_start]accurate[blank_end] memory called a '[blank_start]flashbulb[blank_end] memory'. [blank_start]Cahill[blank_end] and [blank_start]McGaugh[blank_end] [blank_start]1995[blank_end] suggested that [blank_start]hormones[blank_end] associated with [blank_start]emotions[blank_end], for example [blank_start]adrenaline[blank_end], may [blank_start]enhance[blank_end] the [blank_start]storage[blank_end] of memories which could make them more [blank_start]reliable[blank_end].
    1. AEMOTIVE
    2. BEXPERIENCES
    3. Cexperience
    4. Demotionally
    5. Eshocking
    6. Flong-lasting
    7. Gaccurate
    8. Hflashbulb
    9. ICahill
    10. JMcGaugh
    11. K1995
    12. Lhormones
    13. Memotions
    14. Nadrenaline
    15. Oenhance
    16. Pstorage
    17. Qreliable
  4. 4FOR - [blank_start]CHILD[blank_end] WITNESSES ARE [blank_start]RELIABLE[blank_end]
    [blank_start]Davies[blank_end] et al [blank_start]1989[blank_end] reviewed [blank_start]literature[blank_end] discussing [blank_start]children[blank_end] used as [blank_start]witnesses[blank_end]. Found children aged [blank_start]6-7[blank_end] and [blank_start]10-11[blank_end] are fairly [blank_start]accurate[blank_end] and don't usually [blank_start]make[blank_end] things up or [blank_start]lie[blank_end]. [blank_start]Memory[blank_end] for [blank_start]important[blank_end] details isn't really [blank_start]changed[blank_end] by [blank_start]adult[blank_end] suggestions [blank_start]after[blank_end] the event. This [blank_start]contradicts[blank_end] claims made by other [blank_start]researchers[blank_end]. It can't really be [blank_start]claimed[blank_end] that child witnesses are [blank_start]unreliable[blank_end] when most research uses [blank_start]adults[blank_end] as the '[blank_start]target[blank_end]' [blank_start]individual[blank_end]. [blank_start]Anastasi[blank_end] and [blank_start]Rhodes[blank_end] [blank_start]2006[blank_end] found that [blank_start]all[blank_end] [blank_start]age[blank_end] groups are [blank_start]most[blank_end] [blank_start]accurate[blank_end] when [blank_start]recognising[blank_end] an [blank_start]offender[blank_end] from their [blank_start]own[blank_end] age group. May mean that if the [blank_start]child[blank_end] witnesses had observed [blank_start]children[blank_end] committing [blank_start]crimes[blank_end] perhaps they'd be more [blank_start]reliable[blank_end] in their [blank_start]identifications[blank_end].
    1. ACHILD
    2. BRELIABLE
    3. CDavies
    4. D1989
    5. Eliterature
    6. Fchildren
    7. Gwitnesses
    8. H6-7
    9. I10-11
    10. Jaccurate
    11. Kmake
    12. Llie
    13. MMemory
    14. Nimportant
    15. Oadult
    16. Pafter
    17. Qchanged
    18. Rcontradicts
    19. Sresearchers
    20. Tclaimed
    21. Uunreliable
    22. Vadults
    23. Wtarget
    24. Xindividual
    25. YAnastasi
    26. ZRhodes
    27. AA2006
    28. ABall
    29. ACage
    30. ADmost
    31. AEaccurate
    32. AFrecognising
    33. AGoffender
    34. AHown
    35. AIchild
    36. AJchildren
    37. AKcrimes
    38. ALreliable
    39. AMidentifications
  5. 5FOR - [blank_start]MEMORY[blank_end] CAN BE [blank_start]RECONSTRUCTIVE[blank_end] BUT NOT NECESSARILY [blank_start]UNRELIABLE[blank_end]
    Often eyewitnesses [blank_start]know[blank_end] the [blank_start]criminal[blank_end] and therefore don't [blank_start]need[blank_end] to refer to their [blank_start]schemas[blank_end]. E.g [blank_start]RapeCrisis[blank_end] reports that [blank_start]90[blank_end]% of [blank_start]rapists[blank_end] are known by their [blank_start]victims[blank_end]. Eyewitnesses' [blank_start]ability[blank_end] to [blank_start]recognise[blank_end] the rapist is probably very [blank_start]reliable[blank_end].
    1. AMEMORY
    2. BRECONSTRUCTIVE
    3. CUNRELIABLE
    4. Dknow
    5. Ecriminal
    6. Fneed
    7. Gschemas
    8. HRapeCrisis
    9. I90
    10. Jrapists
    11. Kvictims
    12. Lability
    13. Mrecognise
    14. Nreliable
  6. 6AGAINST - [blank_start]POST-EVENT[blank_end] INFORMATION
    In Loftus and [blank_start]Palmer's[blank_end] [blank_start]1974[blank_end] research the [blank_start]information[blank_end] suggested [blank_start]after[blank_end] the event became [blank_start]incorporated[blank_end] into the [blank_start]original[blank_end] memory. [blank_start]Loftus[blank_end] and [blank_start]Zanni[blank_end] [blank_start]1975[blank_end] also demonstrated the [blank_start]effects[blank_end] of such post-event [blank_start]information[blank_end]. Found that [blank_start]7[blank_end]% of people who were [blank_start]asked[blank_end] 'Did you see [blank_start]a[blank_end] broken [blank_start]headlight[blank_end]?' said [blank_start]yes[blank_end], compared to [blank_start]17[blank_end]% of those who were asked 'Did you see [blank_start]THE[blank_end] [blank_start]broken[blank_end] headlight?'. [blank_start]Post-event[blank_end] information was the word '[blank_start]a[blank_end]' or '[blank_start]the[blank_end]'. Clearly shows how any [blank_start]change[blank_end] in the [blank_start]wording[blank_end] of questions can [blank_start]influence[blank_end] the [blank_start]recollection[blank_end] of the participant. The [blank_start]misinformation[blank_end] [blank_start]effect[blank_end] = [blank_start]EWT[blank_end] being effected by [blank_start]false[blank_end] info, [blank_start]leading[blank_end] questions and [blank_start]suggestions[blank_end] from others.
    1. APOST-EVENT
    2. BPalmer's
    3. C1974
    4. Dafter
    5. Einformation
    6. Fincorporated
    7. Goriginal
    8. HLoftus
    9. IZanni
    10. J1975
    11. Keffects
    12. Linformation
    13. M7
    14. Nasked
    15. Oa
    16. Pheadlight
    17. Qyes
    18. R17
    19. STHE
    20. Tbroken
    21. UPost-event
    22. Va
    23. Wthe
    24. Xchange
    25. Ywording
    26. Zinfluence
    27. AArecollection
    28. ABmisinformation
    29. ACeffect
    30. ADEWT
    31. AEfalse
    32. AFleading
    33. AGsuggestions
  7. 7AGAINST - [blank_start]CRIMES[blank_end] ARE [blank_start]EMOTIVE[blank_end] EXPERIENCES
    [blank_start]Eyewitnesses[blank_end] may not be [blank_start]reliable[blank_end] because the crimes they [blank_start]experience[blank_end] are often [blank_start]traumatising[blank_end] and [blank_start]unexpected[blank_end]. [blank_start]Freud[blank_end] argued that [blank_start]painful[blank_end] memories are forced into our [blank_start]unconscious[blank_end] via a process called [blank_start]repression[blank_end]. This is an [blank_start]ego-defence[blank_end] [blank_start]mechanism[blank_end].
    1. AEMOTIVE
    2. BCRIMES
    3. CEyewitnesses
    4. Dreliable
    5. Eexperience
    6. Ftraumatising
    7. Gunexpected
    8. HFreud
    9. Ipainful
    10. Junconscious
    11. Krepression
    12. Lmechanism
    13. Mego-defence
  8. 8AGAINST - [blank_start]CHILD[blank_end] WITNESSES AREN'T [blank_start]RELIABLE[blank_end]
    [blank_start]Children[blank_end] are often thought of as being [blank_start]unreliable[blank_end] because they are [blank_start]prone[blank_end] to [blank_start]fantasy[blank_end] and open to [blank_start]suggestion[blank_end]. Nowadays [blank_start]line-ups[blank_end] don't always include the [blank_start]suspect[blank_end]. [blank_start]Pozzulo[blank_end] and [blank_start]Lindsay[blank_end] [blank_start]1998[blank_end] collected [blank_start]data[blank_end] from a number of [blank_start]studies[blank_end], that in [blank_start]total[blank_end] had tested over [blank_start]2000[blank_end] pps. Found that kids under [blank_start]5[blank_end] were [blank_start]less[blank_end] likely than [blank_start]older[blank_end] children or [blank_start]adults[blank_end] to make [blank_start]correct[blank_end] identification when the [blank_start]suspect[blank_end] is [blank_start]present[blank_end] in the line up. Kids [blank_start]5-13[blank_end] years are more [blank_start]likely[blank_end] to make a [blank_start]choice[blank_end] (that is obviously [blank_start]wrong[blank_end]) in the [blank_start]target-absent[blank_end] condition. Thought to be [blank_start]because[blank_end] children feel they [blank_start]can't[blank_end] say [blank_start]no[blank_end] or have to give an [blank_start]answer[blank_end].
    1. AChildren
    2. BCHILD
    3. CRELIABLE
    4. Dunreliable
    5. Eprone
    6. Ffantasy
    7. Gsuggestion
    8. Hline-ups
    9. Isuspect
    10. JPozzulo
    11. KLindsay
    12. L1998
    13. Mdata
    14. Nstudies
    15. Ototal
    16. P2000
    17. Q5
    18. Rless
    19. Solder
    20. Tadults
    21. Ucorrect
    22. Vsuspect
    23. Wpresent
    24. X5-13
    25. Ylikely
    26. Zchoice
    27. AAwrong
    28. ABtarget-absent
    29. ACbecause
    30. ADcan't
    31. AEno
    32. AFanswer
  9. 9AGAINST - MEMORY IS [blank_start]RECONSTRUCTIVE[blank_end]
    [blank_start]Schemas[blank_end] are used to help us [blank_start]process[blank_end] info [blank_start]quickly[blank_end]. However info [blank_start]already[blank_end] held in our [blank_start]schemas[blank_end] could [blank_start]distort[blank_end] our memory of an [blank_start]event[blank_end]. E.g we have a '[blank_start]criminal[blank_end]' schema from TV, [blank_start]films[blank_end] and the [blank_start]news[blank_end] etc. Could cause us to [blank_start]incorporate[blank_end] [blank_start]expectations[blank_end] into the memory [blank_start]recall[blank_end]. E.g [blank_start]Yarmey[blank_end] [blank_start]1993[blank_end] got [blank_start]240[blank_end] students to watch [blank_start]30[blank_end] videos of [blank_start]male[blank_end] [blank_start]strangers[blank_end] and then [blank_start]classify[blank_end] the males as good or [blank_start]bad[blank_end]. There was a [blank_start]high[blank_end] [blank_start]agreement[blank_end] among pps suggesting they have [blank_start]similar[blank_end] [blank_start]schemas[blank_end]. Can also affect [blank_start]choices[blank_end] in a line-up or [blank_start]photo[blank_end] selection.
    1. ARECONSTRUCTIVE
    2. BSchemas
    3. Cprocess
    4. Dquickly
    5. Ealready
    6. Fschemas
    7. Gdistort
    8. Hevent
    9. Icriminal
    10. Jfilms
    11. Knews
    12. Lincorporate
    13. Mexpectations
    14. Nrecall
    15. OYarmey
    16. P1993
    17. Q240
    18. R30
    19. Smale
    20. Tstrangers
    21. Uclassify
    22. Vbad
    23. Whigh
    24. Xagreement
    25. Ysimilar
    26. Zschemas
    27. AAchoices
    28. ABphoto
  10. 10AGAINST - CASE STUDY
    [blank_start]Antonio[blank_end] [blank_start]Beaver[blank_end], Missouri [blank_start]1996[blank_end]. A [blank_start]woman[blank_end] was [blank_start]threatened[blank_end] by a man in a [blank_start]car[blank_end] park who [blank_start]demanded[blank_end] her keys and [blank_start]purse[blank_end]. Woman [blank_start]ran[blank_end] off, noticing that the [blank_start]man[blank_end] had left [blank_start]blood[blank_end] on her [blank_start]car[blank_end]. The woman told [blank_start]police[blank_end] that the man was [blank_start]tall[blank_end], black and wearing a [blank_start]baseball[blank_end] cap. He also had a [blank_start]gap[blank_end] in his [blank_start]teeth[blank_end]. Beaver was [blank_start]arrested[blank_end] despite the [blank_start]fact[blank_end] that he [blank_start]didn't[blank_end] fit the [blank_start]description[blank_end]. [blank_start]Beaver[blank_end] appeared in a [blank_start]line-up[blank_end] with [blank_start]2[blank_end] policeman and another [blank_start]man[blank_end]. He and the other [blank_start]man[blank_end] were the only ones wearing [blank_start]caps[blank_end]. Beaver was [blank_start]identified[blank_end] as the [blank_start]attacker[blank_end]. He was found [blank_start]guilty[blank_end] in [blank_start]1997[blank_end] and sentenced to [blank_start]18[blank_end] years. In [blank_start]2006[blank_end] The [blank_start]Innocence[blank_end] Project took his [blank_start]case[blank_end] and tested the [blank_start]blood[blank_end] for [blank_start]DNA[blank_end]. Beaver found [blank_start]innocent[blank_end].
    1. AAntonio
    2. BBeaver
    3. C1996
    4. Dwoman
    5. Ethreatened
    6. Fdemanded
    7. Gcar
    8. Hpurse
    9. Iran
    10. Jblood
    11. Kcar
    12. Lman
    13. Mpolice
    14. Ntall
    15. Obaseball
    16. Pgap
    17. Qteeth
    18. Rarrested
    19. Sdescription
    20. Tdidn't
    21. Ufact
    22. VBeaver
    23. Wline-up
    24. X2
    25. Yman
    26. Zcaps
    27. AAman
    28. ABidentified
    29. ACattacker
    30. ADguilty
    31. AE1997
    32. AF18
    33. AG2006
    34. AHInnocence
    35. AIcase
    36. AJblood
    37. AKDNA
    38. ALinnocent

Information

Description
psych yr 2 all xx (cognitive) Quiz on e w t , created by lucy duckmanton on 05/06/2017.
Language
English
Views
2
Rating
No ratings yet
Rate this quiz
Rate this quiz

Feedback

What is it about?

What do you think of the new look?

How do you like it?