Karteikarten
Revision flashcards for classical psychology examination (undergrad)
Karten in diesem Stapel (70)
- 1What was the aim of Asch (1955) experiment?The Aim was to investigate whenever the deep seated beliefs could be altered by social influence. He was influenced by the Second World War and how people's minds changed. he wanted to show how the process of conformity is not mindless or irrational as well as not dogmatically done.
- 2What was the Aim of Harlow & Harlow (1962) study?The aim was to investigate the bond between the mother and child as well as whenever surrogates can replace biological mothers. The main emphasis of the experiment was to investigate whenever physiological needs were the only necessity mammals and humans needed to develop properly
- 3What was the Aim of Milgram (1963) study?The aim was to investigate the willingness of people to obey an individual with authority and to what extent can that authority override ethics, moral conduct and empathy for another human being
- 4What was the aim of Watson & Rayner (1920) study?the experimenter wanted to show all human behaviour stems from learning and conditioning as well as suggest that the freudian conception might be not necessarily accurate in portraying accurate scientifically-relevant psychological knowledge
- 5What was the Aim of Zimbardo (1971) study?Similarly to Milgram's study, Zimbardo wanted to show that it is not personality that creates "evil" individuals but rather the circumstances and how particular societies can influence the moral, ethical, and emphatic capabilities of individuals
- 6What was the aim of Bandura (1961) study?Bandura beloved that humans did not "purge" themselves from aggressive intent when looking at violence. the creation of this experiment was to suggest that individuals learned from such experiences and instead of preventing violence, the viewing of violence exacerbated it
- 7What was the aim of Sherif (1949-1954) study?Sherif wanted to investigate how group norms form through development of group dynamics. the experiment's true aim however was during what time do different groups make judgements in the same situation and where that situation is malign rather than benign?
- 8What was the aim of Piaget et al (1962) study?Piaget's study aimed to investigate the plausibility of his theories in regards to stages of development, as well as to investigate potential limitations that children at certain ages are posing, allowing him to confirm his theory.
- 9What was the Aim of Tajfel et al (1971-1973) study?The aim of Tajfel's experiment was to investigate the minimum conditions to create in-group favouritism and ethnocentrism. furthermore, Tajfel wanted to investigate whenever zero-sum situations are necessary to elicit discrimination of out group.
- 10What was the aim of Meltzoff and Moore (1977) study?Based upon piagetan theories of development, M&M's study wanted to investigate imitation, both facial and manual, which has been suggested to be a major milestone in development of an individual. Also, M&M have found that imitation can occur earlier than Piaget's initial predictions, giving a new perspective.
- 11What was the aim of Hamilton (1976) study?The purpose of H's study was to investigate how humans are prone to be cognitive misers as well as how social phenomena can be explained without political and sociological theories but with social cognition instead.
- 12What was the aim of Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) study?BC's study revolved around primarily suggesting that people from the ASL as well as individuals with autism experience difficulties employing their theory of mind to use in hypothetical situations
- 13What was the aim of the Jensen (1969) study?J's controversial study suggested that gender as well as socioeconomic status and race can affect the particular intelligence quotient of an individual.
- 14What was the Aim of festinger (1956) study?F's study involved the investigation of a phenomenon he later named cognitive dissonance, with this process being the situation where facts of reality and ideological beliefs are conflicting with each other, resulting in a choice of either changing one's ideology or interpretation of facts
- 15What was the methodology of Asch (1955) experiment?Asch collected n = 123 participants and performed a simple test utilising his paradigm (different size lines) in order to test conformity. the naive participant was exposed to confederates that gave the wrong answer during the third trial out of 18 trials.
- 16What was the methodology of Harlow & Harlow (1962) study?H&H separated infant rhesus monkeys 6-12 hours after birth. the replacement mothers were created out of wire or wood and covered with Terry cloth. however there was only one which provided nutrition, without the soft fabric covering her.
- 17What was the methodology of Milgram (1963) study?A self-selected sample of participants was selected and identified well-adjusted individuals. P's were introduced to a confederate (student) and saw him strapped to a shock generator (heart issues warning). The participant is then instructed to give shocks for every wrong answer which con. gave. DV was volt amount.
- 18What was the methodology of Watson & Rayner (1920) study?A child reared from birth in a hospital was selected as the participant. the participant was then subjugated to show different animals and objects (white rat, rabbit, dog, mask with fur, mask without fur
- 19What was the methodology of Zimbardo et al. (1971) study?Methodology:
- 20What was the methodology of Bandura et al. (1961) study?Methodology:
- 21What was the methodology of Sherif (1949-1954) study?Methodology:
- 22What was the methodology of Piaget et al. (1962) study?Methodology:
- 23What was the methodology of Tajfel et al. (1971-1973) study?methodology:
- 24What was the methodology of Meltzoff and Moore (1977) study?Methodology:
- 25What was the methodology of Hamilton (1976) study?Methodology:
- 26What was the methodology of Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) study?Methodology:
- 27What was the methodology of the Jensen (1969) study?Methodology:
- 28What was the methodology of Festinger et al. (1956) study?methodology:
- 29What were the results of Asch (1955) experiment?Results:
- 30What were the results of Harlow & Harlow (1962) study?Results:
- 31What were the results of Milgram (1963) study?Results:
- 32What were the results of Watson & Rayner (1920) study?Results:
- 33What were the results of Zimbardo et al. (1971) study?results:
- 34What were the results of Bandura et al. (1961) study?Results
- 35What were the results of Sherif (1949-1954) study?results
- 36What were the results of Piaget et al. (1962) study?Results
- 37What were the results of Tajfel et al. (1971-1973) study?Results
- 38What were the results of Meltzoff and Moore (1977) study?Results
- 39What were the results of Hamilton (1976) study?Results:
- 40What were the results of Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) study?Results:
- 41What were the results of the Jensen (1969) study?Results:
- 42What were the results of Festinger et al. (1956) study?Results:
- 43What was the impact of Asch (1955) experiment? (part 1)impact:
- 44Filler for second part for Asch Impact flashcardImpact:
- 45What was the impact of Harlow & Harlow (1962) study?Impact
- 46Filler for second part of Harlow and Harlow studyImpact:
- 47What was the impact of Milgram (1963) study?impact:
- 48filler for second part of Milgram (1963) study?impact:
- 49What was the impact of Watson & Rayner (1920) study?Impact
- 50filler for second part of Watson and Rayner (1920) studyImpact
- 51What was the impact of Zimbardo et al. (1971) study?Impact
- 52filler for second part of Watson and Rayner (1920) studyImpact:
- 53What was the impact of Bandura et al. (1961) study?Impact
- 54Filler for second part of Bandura 1961 studyImpact
- 55What was the impact of Sherif (1949-1954) study?impact
- 56Filler for the second part of Sherif (1949-1954) studyimpact
- 57What was the impact of Piaget et al. (1962) study?Impact
- 58Filler for the second part of Piaget et al. (1962) studyImpact
- 59What was the impact of Tajfel et al. (1971-1973) study?Impact
- 60Filler for the second part of Tajfel et al. (1971-1973) studyImpact
- 61What was the impact of Meltzoff and Moore (1977) study?impact
- 62Filler for the second part of impact for Meltzoff and Moore (1977) studyImpact
- 63What were the results of Hamilton (1976) study?Impact
- 64Filler for the second part of impact for Hamilton (1976) studyImpact
- 65What was the impact of Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) study?Impact
- 66Filler for the second part of impact in Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) studyImpact
- 67What was the impact of the Jensen (1969) study?impact
- 68Filler for the second part of impact in Jensen (1969) studyImpact
- 69What were the results of Festinger et al. (1956) study?Impact
- 70Filler for the second part of impact in Festinger et al. (1956) studyImpact
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- A small list of certain classical studies that might help anyone doing psychology have a basic understanding of the aims, methods, results and impact of classical studies. The answers have been tailored to include information that would be relevant for examination purposes therefore feel free to conduct your own reaserch in order to find more information or clarify particular choices made by the researchers in the classical studies. Tip:use filler cards with impact card for in depth knowledge.
- Erstellt von
- Jacob Gorzynski
- Aufrufe
- 34
- Tags
- Bewertung